Chapter 7 - Intro to Law

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/24

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

25 Terms

1
New cards
Inchoate Crimes
Offenses based on criminal acts that have been initiated or planned but not yet fully completed.
2
New cards
Solicitation
The act of asking, hiring, or encouraging another person to commit a crime, regardless of whether the act is carried out.
3
New cards
Conspiracy
An agreement between two or more individuals to commit a crime, along with an overt act taken in furtherance of that criminal goal.
4
New cards
Attempt
An act performed with the intent to commit a crime that constitutes a substantial step toward its commission, but fails to complete the offense.
5
New cards
Doctrine of Complicity
A legal doctrine establishing that anyone who joins or participates in a crime is as guilty as if they committed the crime alone.
6
New cards
Prima Facie Case
The legal threshold requiring the state to present the minimum amount of evidence necessary to prove every element of an offense and sustain a conviction.
7
New cards
Reasonable Doubt Defense
A defense strategy focused on casting doubt on any core aspect of the prosecution's evidence or case.
8
New cards
Alibi
A defense asserting that the defendant was at a different physical location during the commission of the crime, making participation impossible.
9
New cards
Self-Defense
The legal right to use proportional force to protect oneself from an imminent threat of harm.
10
New cards
Defense of Others
The right to use proportional force to protect a third party who is unable to defend themselves.
11
New cards
Defense of Property
The limited right to use non-deadly force to protect personal or real property from unlawful interference.
12
New cards
Necessity (Choice-of-Evils)
An affirmative defense asserting that committing an illegal act was justified to prevent a greater imminent harm.
13
New cards
Duress
A defense claiming the defendant was coerced into committing a criminal act under threat of immediate physical harm or death.
14
New cards
Mistake of Fact
An honest, reasonable misunderstanding regarding a factual circumstance that negates the required mental state (mens rea) for a crime.
15
New cards
Entrapment
An affirmative defense alleging that law enforcement induced an individual to commit a crime they were not otherwise predisposed to commit.
16
New cards
Involuntary Intoxication
A defense claiming the defendant unknowingly or forcibly consumed an intoxicating substance, negating their ability to form mens rea.
17
New cards
Syndromes Defense
Arguments (e.g., PTSD or Battered Person Syndrome) positing that extreme traumatic conditions impaired the capacity to form criminal intent.
18
New cards
Insanity
A legal defense alleging that a mental disease or defect prevented the accused from forming the requisite mens rea or understanding the wrongfulness of their act.
19
New cards
Infancy
The legal presumption that young children lack the cognitive capacity to form criminal intent, which becomes rebuttable as they grow older.
20
New cards
Due Process
Constitutional protections ensuring that legal and judicial proceedings remain fair, equitable, and unbiased before depriving an individual of liberty.
21
New cards
Adversarial System
A judicial structure in which opposing sides (prosecution and defense) present evidence before an impartial judge or jury.
22
New cards
Arrest
The physical taking into custody of a person believed to have committed a crime, governed by Fourth Amendment protections.
23
New cards
Probable Cause
Facts and circumstances that would lead a reasonably intelligent person to believe an offense occurred and that the suspect committed it.
24
New cards
Custodial Interrogation
Questioning by law enforcement while a suspect is in custody, triggering Fifth Amendment self-incrimination protections.
25
New cards
Miranda Warnings
Constitutional warnings given before custodial interrogation advising suspects of their right to remain silent and right to legal counsel (Miranda v. Arizona).