1/35
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What are flows?
the movement of people, products, money and other things across time/space
Why study geographical flows?
create links
help understand patterns
help plan distribution of resources
help predict the future
help understand how systems work
Name and describe the site of the investigation of flows.
Swanage Bay-
a bay on the
East Coast of the
Isle of Purbeck
in southern England- Dorset
What is the enquiry question?
How do coastal management strategies affect the natural sediment flow in Swanage Bay?
What are the key questions?
Why does Swanage Bay need coastal management?- link to sediment flow
What coastal management strategies are being employed?
How effective are the coastal management strategies?- link to impact on sediment flow
Describe the distribution of rock-types in Swanage Bay.
Bay is made of soft clay and sands
making it vulnerable to erosion
What are the coastal management objectives in Swanage Bay? (secondary information)
protect economic viability
protect core values + character of the center of Swanage
reduce flood risk
maintain beach widths + use
manage risk to properties
maintain geological exposures- World Heritage Site + SSSI
maintain landscape, views + appreciation of coastal environment
support adaptability of communities
reduce reliance on defences
Why has there been no active intervention on the eroding cliff face?
no economic value
How is the center of the bay protected?
Hold the Line- groynes + recharge
How is the southernmost curve of the Bay protected?
Hold the Line- Sea Wall
What are the 4 methods of data collection undertaken?
Groyne drop height- to establish effectiveness
Field sketch
Beach Profile- assess difference between replenishment + non-replenished
Wave measurements
Groyne Drop Height: Describe
type of data
sampling strategy
method
Primary, Pragmatic, Quantitative
Metre rule to measure drop from the bottom to the top of the groyne uprights.
Repeat for first 10 uprights on each groyne- both N/S sides.
Calculate average drop for N/S sides.
Share data with other groups- increase sample size + reliability
Groyne Drop Heights: Justify
data collected
data type
sampling strategy
reliability
measure of groyne effectiveness
if sediment built up on one side, drop would differ, showing the groynes work in preventing sediment flow due to LSD
quantitative- easy to graph, compare, spot patterns
pragmatic
time + numbers = first 10 groynes
tourist heavy area → most important area- maintained the most
reliable as we took 10 measurements + avg.
Groyne Drop Heights: Evaluate
pros and cons of method
Pros:
we used metre rules with cm marking- accurate
collated data with other groups- reliable
relatively cheap- not much equipment
easy- minimal skills required
Cons:
beach wasn’t only affected by coastal erosion (reprofiling, road drainage)
Groyne 5 had a surface draining pipe from the road- abnormally small south side
data doesn’t represent prevailing conditions- short time
access was tide-dependent
we may have missed a trend on the other side of the beach
Field Sketch- describe
type of data
method
Qualitative, Primary
We drew a basic sketch of Swanage Bay.
Annotations- defences, groynes, beach huts
anything that could alter the cost benefit of sea defenses
Field Sketch: Justify
data collected
data type
clear- lack of unnecessary details
better than photograph
very fast
minimal equipment needed
Field Sketch: Evaluate
pros and cons of method
Pros:
Very fast, clear
minimal equipment needed
simple
important aspects highlighted
Cons:
scale could be inaccurate- impacting analysis
features may be invisible to the naked eye
Wave measurement: describe
type of data
method
working out
Quantitative, Primary data
Choose point at end of groyne.
Time a minute, count waves past point, record.
(>13 waves = destructive waves)
Throw an apple into the sea and mark place with ranger pole.
Wait a minute, find where it ended up.
Set another pole at end location and measure distance between poles.
Wave measurement: justify
data collected
method
accuracy:
tape measure used- precise to the mm
carried out in 2 areas to compare results
data:
easy to find constructive/destructive
Wave measurement: evaluate
pros and cons of method
pros:
easy to do
minimal equipment
quick
cons:
data only represents a part of the beach
on the day, the winds blew NE, so LSD carried sediment in the opposite direction than it normally does
Beach profiles: describe
data types
method
Primary
Systematic
areas chosen to cover space between each groyne
Set up ranger pole at edge of wet sand
Set up next pole 2m into the beach with tape measure.
Use a clinometer, place it at 1st pole and align with same point on next pole.
Identify angle and record.
Place 1st pole 2m inland from the 2nd, repeating process until sea wall.
Repeat at another point- one nourished, one not.
Beach profile: justify
data collected
data types
Systematic:
regular intervals removes bias + allowed the coverage of large area
measuring the change in angle from sea wall to sea meant we could measure the effect of nourishment on gradient of land.
Beach profile: evaluate
Pros and cons
Pros
simple + easy
quick
Cons:
incorrect readings of clinometer
skewed data by human activity
area covered depends on the tide
Groyne Drop Height: presentation
name the presentation
justify
bar graph
clear and easy to interpret trend
visual and numerical representation
reading off the actual value is hard
Wave fq and direction: presentation
name the presentation
justify
rose diagrams
easy visual representation
not difficult to interpret
size = frequency
LSD direction + distance: presentation
name presentation
justify
Flow lines- arrows on maps
visually clear
simple conversion scale
time consuming
Beach profile: presentation
name presentation
justify
use beach profile calculator
put in values + angles to generate a slope
easily understandable
data represented clearly
Field sketch: presentation
name
justify
field sketch
only important features drawn
Flows analysis
field sketch
groyne drop
beach profile
sketch
showed strategies were wall, groynes (and replenishment)
groyne drop height:
drop on south-facing side less than north-facing side
Groyne 5 was by a sewage outlet so extra sand was eroded
overall trend- groynes are trapping sediment flowing from the south.
wave measurements:
LSD went N→S- anomaly on day
beach profile:
beach is wider where nourishment happened in 2005/6
showed it has worked
Flows conclusion
why management
what’s used
how effective
coastal erosion → LSD → in northerly direction → decreased beach → tourism impact
groynes along coast, sea wall, nourishment
groyne on south side- 73.7
groyne on north side- 83.3
shows they have worked in stopping build up
Groyne drop: evaluation
accuracy
enhanced + issues + improvements
careful measurements with a rigid ruler- no slack + no sinking into sand
tide affected access
better by replicating in 2 locations
Groyne drop: evaluation
reliability
enhanced + issues + improvements
measured at multiple points + averaged
pragmatic sampling- only closest areas to town
better my multiple people measuring + discounting anomalies + averaging
LSD with apple: evaluation
accuracy
enhanced + issues + improvements
timing with stopwatch = exact time
apple may not act like sediment
better by using painted pebble instead of apple
LSD with apple: evaluation
reliability
enhanced + issues + improvements
measuring in s and mm- smallest units
lack of repeats of experiment
repeat in multiple tidal conditions
Beach profile: evaluation
accuracy
enhanced + issues + improvements
using a clinometer- accurate angles
room for error in reading of measurements
better by having multiple people read value
Beach profile: evaluation
reliability
enhanced + issues + improvements
systematic sampling- every 2m removed bias
only 1 measurement taken + only in 2 areas- one nourished/one not
better by measuring more points, more areas and take averages