Problems of Tsarist Russia

Communications and Admin Weakness

• Vast distances and poor roads made for slow movement whilst rivers froze over in winter and flowed in useless directions. Drought and poor harvests contributed to 1891-92 famines

• Weak communication made it difficult to transport gods and troops as exposed in the Crimean War (1853-56) defeat.

• provincial officials appointed by tsar. The beauracracy was slow and corrupt because the central govt could not closely supervise distant areas so local officials excercised considerable power. Low literacy also limited skilled workers and engineers

• Administrative paralysis meant the Tsar lacked efficient control over distant provinces , forcing over reliance on governors and harsh military repression rather than soft power.

• Railway expansion could prove beneficial as it connected goods , troops and raw materials to the centre so therefore it was a political and economic priority

• 
  

Nationalities and Russification

• 1897 census showed it had 126 million people however multiple nationalities such as poles Finns and Jews resided in this empire.

• Separate nationalities such identities , political ambitions and different languages could weaken the empire. Banning foreign languages could weaken the empire

• Russia attempted to reduce autonomy of foreign countries e.g : Russian language becoming increasingly important in Polish schools , greater involvement in the Finnish diet and forcing all Jews to live in the Pale of Settlement (essentially ostracising and alienating them)

• Russification alienated national elites and drove oppressed minorities into radical political opposition and revolution due to its poor execution of enforced control rather than slow intergration. Russia essentially converted passive regional populations into active anti-Tsarist separatists as ethnic minorities felt a greater need to protect their nationalities.

Peasants and Agriculture

• Emancipation Edict of 1861 burdened peasants with redemption payments for insufficient land (worsened by population growth which caused landholdings to shrink) and inefficient farming controlled by the Mir who also restricted movement and discouraged individual investment.

• The govt expected peasants to provide food , taxes and exports yet starved and squeezed them , creating rural land hunger yet simultaneously invested heavily in railways and heavy industry funded by grain exports to improve industrialisation rather than improving peasant livelihoods.

Motive For Industrialisation

• Russia was economically backward compared to Western Europe. Industrialisation was essential for military strength (warships required steel and modern armies required effective transport and artillery) . No industrialisation would risk vulnerability.

• Modernisation was driven by military survival and power status not social welfare. Modernising the economy while preserving political autocracy would be paradoxical.

The Great Spurt (Sergei Witte)

• Railway expansion : built Trans-Siberian Railway in 1891 to connect EU Russia with Siberia , strengthening govt control and increased demand for coal iron and steel

• Foreign Investment: Encouraged investment from France , Britain , Belgium to allow Russia build factories and railway quicker but made the country reliant on foreign investors

• Gold Standard : rouble placed on thios toy stabiliser the currency and increase investor confidence

Consequences of Russification

• Industrialisation heavily concentrated in areas like Moscow and the Donbas.

• By concentrating low paid high hour workers in large, dense urban factories, the state unknowingly created ideal conditions for organized strikes, trade unionism, and revolutionary agitators.

• 1899 economic downturn meant factories reduced production and increased unemployment leading to widespread worker unrest

• Industrialisation strengthened railways , military and heavy industry but did not solve geographic problems , poor admin and national division nor rural poverty.

• It strengthened the stater but also expanding cities and concentrating industrial workforces became difficult for an autocratic govt to ctrl. It paradoixically modernised the economy with modernising its political system