1/38
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Covenantal Nominism
Israel is chosen by grace, keeping torah is the grateful response, not a way to earn favor
Antithesis
Mathew 5: “you have heard it said but I say to you”“is a teaching method used by Jesus to clarify and deepen the understanding of the Law. Jesus intensifies the Torah
Alexander the Great
356-323 BCE, conquered Persia(336), spread greek culture, his empire split into syria and egypt
Theophilus
“Lover of God”, the addresse of both Luke and Acts
Passover
feast commemorating the exodus, Jesus was crucified at passover. In synoptics, the last supper is a passover meal. In John jesus dies when passover lambs are slaughtered
New Covenent
Jerimiah 31:31-34 a renewed covenent with Israel and Judah, with Torah written on heart
Golden Rule
Matt 7:12 Do to others as you would have them do to you, for this is the law of the prophets”
Helllenization
spread of greek language and culture post Alexander, resisted in Maccabean revolt
Eschatology
teaching about the end of an age
Ritual Purity
Impurity comes from contact with death, birth, or bodily fluids. Its contagious and not a sin. You must be pure to approach the holy
Holy/sacred
“set apart” seperate from the common, tied to YHWH’s immortality
Profane
ordinary, everyday. Holy and pure are not moral categories
Synoptic Problem
the relationship between Mathew, Mark, and Luke. Who copied who?
Markan Priority
Mark is the middle term: when Mathew and Luke agree in order and wording it is with mark 2. Harder readings 3. Editoral Fatigue
Two source hypothesis
Mathew and Luke independantly used Mark plus source
Farrer hypothesis
Markan priority without Q. Luke used Mark and Mathew
Q
German quelle - source
Triple tradition
in all three gospels ex(the sower, feeding 5000)
Double tradition
Mathew plus Luke only (The Lord’s prayer, the beatitudes) mostly sayings
Intercalation
Mark’s story sandwich: one story split around another so one interprets the other
Irony
the reader knows Jesu's’s true identity while the characters don’t
Messiah
“annointed One” Jewish hopes for a Davidic king who would restore Israel
Kingdom of God
God’s coming reign that sets the world right and restores Israel, the center of Jesus’s preaching Mark 1:15
Sermon on the Mount
Mathew 5-7, summary of Jesus’s teachings
beatitude
“blessed are …” promises of an end time reversal. mathew “poor in spirit” Luke “you poor”, woes for rich
Historical Jesus criteria
embarrasment; dissimilarity; multiple attestation; contextual credibility
Parousia
“arrival/presence” : Jesus’ return. Near in Mark, delayed in Luke, Realized in John
Apology
a defense, not saying sorry. Luke-Acts works as political apology; shows christianity is not a threat to Rome
Damascus Road
paul’s vision of the risen Jesus(33 CE), told 3 times in Acts, Paul describes as god revealing his son in me
Pentecost
Acts 2: the holy spirit descends on the apostles, speak in tongues to jews from every nation, peter preaches, 3000 are baptized, starts the Church’s mission
Fall of Samaria to Assyria
722 BCE, the 10 northern tribes are scattered, which is why restoration hopes are all about israel
Babylon takes Jerusalem
586 BCE, the exile of Judah, start of diaspora
Return to Jerusalem
539 BCE, only a partial return, most stay scattered, so exile isnt really over
Second Temple rebuilt
515 BCE, start of the 2nd temple period
Maccabean revolt
167-160 BCE, Antichous defiles the temple and bans circumcision
Roman Control of palestine
63 BCE, leads to Herod, Pilate, and the world of NT
Birth of Jesus
4 BCE, before herod the greats death
Death of jesus
30 CE, crucified at passover under Pilate
Romans destroy Jerusalem and the temple
70 CE, Dating clue for gospels, Mark 68-70, Mathew and Luke in 80s, John in 90s