1/11
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Dual Court System
two parallel systems
state courts: handle most disputes, each state has its own structure for state law issues
federal courts: limited matters involving federal law or diversity of citizenship
trial courts
courts of original jurisdiction—where cases begin, facts are established, evidence presented, witnesses heard
appellate courts
reviews trial court decisions, but doesn’t retry facts or hear new evidence
highest court (state supreme or US supreme)
final word on legal questions in that system
jurisdiction
a courts authority over involved parties
in personam
over defedant personally, based on residence, presence, or consent.
plaintiffs usually file where they reside so this mainly concerns the defendent
if the defendent is a corp/llc/llp, need to determine juridction
long arm
allows states to obtain jurisdiction over an out of state defendant if they have a sufficient connection
In rem
over the thing/property—allwos courts to assert jurisdiction over the thing
quasi in rem
won controversy in one state but defendant lives in another and refuses to pay, you would establsih quasi in rem jrusidiction in the state where the defendant is located
subject matter
authority of a court to adjudicate a particular subject matter of a case
minimum contacts requirement
defendant must have enough meaningful contact with the forum state that its fair to require them to defend a suit there
determining jurisdiciton for a corp/llc/llp
where are they incorporated?
where are their headquarters?
what are their contacts with the state?