resorting performance justin, mary and david

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/120

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

121 Terms

1
New cards

How old is Justin and what sport does he compete in?

18 years old; elite hurdler.

2
New cards

What was Justin’s primary injury?

Grade 3 right biceps femoris hamstring tear of his lead hurdling leg.

3
New cards

How long since Justin’s hamstring tear?

Four months.

4
New cards

What relevant previous injuries has Justin sustained?

Right navicular and tibial stress fractures two years ago.

5
New cards

What did Justin’s imaging and bone density show?

MRI confirmed grade 3 biceps femoris tear; BMD was normal.

6
New cards

What is Justin’s current symptom and ADL status?

Pain-free with full activities of daily living.

7
New cards

When did Justin resume running?

Week 6, starting with gentle jogging.

8
New cards

What running level has Justin reached?

70% effort in straight-line running over 200–400 m.

9
New cards

Which high-demand tasks has Justin not yet resumed?

Full hurdling and power/plyometric training.

10
New cards

Which eccentric hamstring exercises has Justin recently started?

Arabesques and deadlifts.

11
New cards

What was Justin’s pre-injury weekly training split?

Running/hurdles Mon, Wed, Fri, Sat; weights Tue, Thu; rest Sunday.

12
New cards

What were Justin’s Monday and Wednesday sessions?

Flat sprints plus hurdle drills.

13
New cards

What were Justin’s Friday and Saturday sessions?

Friday technique/hurdle skills; Saturday intervals up to 5 km.

14
New cards

What distinguished Justin’s Tuesday and Thursday gym sessions?

Tuesday focused on leg strength; Thursday on leg power.

15
New cards

What is Justin’s proposed SMART performance goal?

Compete at 90–100% intensity in a 100 m hurdles qualifier in 3 months.

16
New cards

Why is Justin’s target competition timeline demanding?

Qualifying club events begin in 3 months; championships are in 4 months.

17
New cards

Which two single-leg power outcome measures were proposed for Justin?

Single-leg vertical jump and single-leg standing broad jump.

18
New cards

What does a single-leg vertical jump assess?

Unilateral vertical power and side-to-side differences.

19
New cards

What does a single-leg standing broad jump assess?

Unilateral horizontal propulsion and side-to-side differences.

20
New cards

What is the main focus in Justin’s initial 4–6 weeks of the plan?

Cardiovascular fitness and progressive running, bike or pool conditioning.

21
New cards

What is the main training focus in Justin’s second month?

Lower-limb muscular power, while progressing speed and conditioning.

22
New cards

What is the main training focus in Justin’s third month?

Lower-limb power and plyometrics, with continued speed/fitness progression.

23
New cards

What late-stage sport exposure is planned for Justin?

About 3 weeks of full-speed hurdle efforts and 100–200 m flat sprints.

24
New cards

When does Justin’s planned pre-competition taper occur?

During the final 10 days, principally by reducing volume.

25
New cards

How long are Justin’s typical training sessions?

About 1–2 hours, including warm-up, drills and cool-down.

26
New cards

Which additional staff communication is planned for Justin?

Weekly progress reports to NSW Institute of Sport coaching staff and exercise physiologists.

27
New cards

What is Justin’s single-leg hop-for-height prescription?

2 × 10 each leg: 40 total contacts.

28
New cards

What is Justin’s single-leg bound-for-distance prescription?

2 × 5 each leg: 20 total contacts.

29
New cards

What is Justin’s box jump-down prescription?

1 × 10: 10 contacts.

30
New cards

What is Justin’s dynamic lunge/fast-arms prescription?

2 × 10: 20 counted contacts in the supplied plan.

31
New cards

What is Justin’s total prescribed plyometric session volume?

90 contacts per session.

32
New cards

What intensity and frequency are proposed for Justin’s plyometrics?

90–100% effort, once weekly, if readiness and tolerance permit.

33
New cards

What inter-set recovery is proposed for Justin’s maximal plyometrics?

Complete recovery; about 5 minutes between sets.

34
New cards

What is Justin’s home stretching dosage?

2 × 30 seconds, 1–2 times daily.

35
New cards

What muscle groups feature in Justin’s stretching HEP?

Pecs, lats, obliques, QL, hip flexors, lumbar region, glutes, quads, groin, hamstrings, calves.

36
New cards

What core-control HEP was proposed for Justin?

20 minutes daily: bent-knee fallouts, clams and quadruped hip quadrants.

37
New cards

How old is Mary and what operation did she have?

75 years old; right total knee replacement for severe osteoarthritis.

38
New cards

How long post-operation is Mary?

16 weeks (approximately 4 months).

39
New cards

What is Mary’s target activity in 4 months?

A 3-week section of the Camino Trail in Spain.

40
New cards

What daily walking distances are expected on Mary’s trip?

Approximately 10–20 km per walking day.

41
New cards

What is the planned rest pattern on the Camino?

A rest day every third day.

42
New cards

How much weight must Mary carry?

A daypack weighing up to 5 kg.

43
New cards

What is Mary’s current walking capacity?

Comfortable walking 10 km on flat ground every third day.

44
New cards

What did Mary’s surgeon advise?

She is cleared to train for the walk.

45
New cards

What exercise is Mary already performing?

Gym strength twice weekly, bike work and water aerobics once weekly.

46
New cards

What relevant medication does Mary take?

Statins for high cholesterol.

47
New cards

How difficult is Mary’s planned trail?

Moderate: 5–7 hours/day, under 20 km/day on average, possibly 1000 m ascent.

48
New cards

What is the proposed 4-week SMART goal for Mary?

Walk 15 km on 2 consecutive days with a 5 kg pack, then rest day 3, without major flare.

49
New cards

Which test can assess Mary’s lower-limb strength?

10-repetition maximum (10RM) leg press.

50
New cards

Which test can assess Mary’s submaximal functional walking capacity?

Six-minute walk test (6MWT).

51
New cards

Which test options can assess Mary’s cardiovascular capacity?

PWC75 or Bruce-protocol treadmill test, as appropriate.

52
New cards

Which knee-specific patient-reported outcome measure is suggested?

Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS).

53
New cards

What other patient-reported domain should be tracked for Mary?

Quality of life.

54
New cards

What weekly distance progression is suggested for Mary?

About 10–15% where tolerated, individualised to response.

55
New cards

When should Mary begin progressively hilly walks?

Once she comfortably manages 20 km on 2 consecutive days.

56
New cards

What walking surfaces must Mary eventually prepare for?

Hills, stairs, steps and some steep terrain.

57
New cards

What equipment should Mary use on training walks?

Her intended 5 kg backpack, progressively introduced if tolerated.

58
New cards

How often should Mary perform gym-based strength sessions?

Twice weekly in the broader plan; the sample exercise block allows 2–3 times weekly.

59
New cards

What is the proposed basic leg press prescription for Mary?

2–3 × 8–12 at ~70% 1RM; 1:1:3 tempo; 2-min rests.

60
New cards

Which other exercises use Mary’s basic strength parameters?

Cable single-leg hip extension, hip abduction and Smith machine double-leg calf raise.

61
New cards

How are Mary’s step-ups prescribed?

15–20 cm step, quick ascent, band at distal thighs; 2 × 15 bilaterally.

62
New cards

How are Mary’s reverse lunges prescribed?

5–10 kg weight vest with controlled 3:1:1 tempo; dose tailored to tolerance.

63
New cards

How could Mary’s strength program progress towards power?

Modify load, sets, reps and tempo to favour faster concentric actions.

64
New cards

What cross-training can Mary use on non-walking days?

Water aerobics; stationary bike if desired or walking is irritating.

65
New cards

What travel/health preparation should Mary consider?

GP follow-up before travel and education on heat and hydration.

66
New cards

How often and how long is Mary’s stretching HEP?

2 × 30 seconds, 1–2 times per day.

67
New cards

What is Mary’s proposed daily core HEP?

20 min: bent-knee fallouts, clams and bridging.

68
New cards

What is Mary’s proposed balance HEP dosage?

3 × 30 seconds, 1–2 times daily.

69
New cards

Which balance drills are suggested for Mary?

Single-leg stance eyes open/closed ± foam; tandem walks; stepping over obstacles.

70
New cards

Why train repeated consecutive walking days for Mary?

To build recovery capacity and tolerance to the trip’s multiday demands.

71
New cards

Who is David and what sport/position does he play?

22-year-old A Grade soccer midfielder.

72
New cards

What is David’s injury and surgery history?

Right ACL rupture 8 months ago; reconstruction with hamstring graft ~7.5 months ago.

73
New cards

What is David’s current clinical status?

Full pain-free ADLs and no major side-to-side differences on MMT.

74
New cards

Why is manual muscle testing alone insufficient for David?

It may miss strength deficits; dynamometry gives objective torque/force values.

75
New cards

When does David’s preseason start?

In 2 weeks.

76
New cards

When are David’s practice matches scheduled?

In 3 months: 2 matches over consecutive weekends, each 2 × 30 minutes.

77
New cards

How long are David’s competitive matches?

Two 45-minute halves.

78
New cards

What is David’s team training and match schedule?

Training Monday, Wednesday, Friday; Sunday matches.

79
New cards

What is David’s overarching return-to-soccer goal?

Return safely in ~12 weeks, conditional on objective and clinical criteria.

80
New cards

What limb symmetry threshold is a useful minimum screening target?

At least 90% on appropriate strength and hop tests; not sufficient alone.

81
New cards

Why must David’s return to sport be criteria-based?

Calendar time alone cannot confirm physical, psychological or sport-specific readiness.

82
New cards

Which knee signs contraindicate progressing high-intensity plyometrics?

Reactive effusion, significant pain, instability or poor load response.

83
New cards

Which tools objectively test David’s quadriceps/hamstring strength?

Isokinetic dynamometry, or fixed dynamometry if needed.

84
New cards

Why compare David’s absolute strength alongside limb symmetry?

Both legs could be deconditioned despite a high limb symmetry index.

85
New cards

What does the single-leg hop for distance assess?

Horizontal unilateral function, power and confidence.

86
New cards

Why use triple and crossover hop tests for David?

To examine repeated power and multiplanar control.

87
New cards

What do vertical/countermovement jumps assess?

Vertical power and potentially interlimb force asymmetry.

88
New cards

What does reactive strength index (RSI) reflect?

Reactive jump output relative to ground contact time.

89
New cards

What should landing and cutting observations assess?

Trunk control, knee valgus, asymmetry and force absorption.

90
New cards

Why progress from planned to reactive change of direction?

Soccer demands responses to teammates, opponents and ball movement.

91
New cards

Which fitness test is relevant to David’s midfield role?

Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test.

92
New cards

What psychological readiness measure is suggested?

ACL–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale.

93
New cards

What is the main focus of David’s weeks 1–4?

Baseline testing, maximal strength, landing quality, running and controlled soccer.

94
New cards

What is David’s broad weeks 1–4 weekly training dose?

2–3 strength sessions and 2 plyometric exposures, plus progressive running.

95
New cards

What is the main focus of David’s weeks 5–8?

Explosive/reactive power, faster running, cutting and soccer-specific tasks.

96
New cards

How does cutting complexity change in weeks 5–8?

Planned drills advance toward reactive/unplanned cutting.

97
New cards

What is the main focus of David’s weeks 9–12?

Full training, reactive soccer tasks, match simulations and graded match exposure.

98
New cards

Why is graded playing time useful in David’s practice matches?

It manages workload and allows monitoring of knee response before full matches.

99
New cards

How should in-season ACL prevention be managed?

Continue maintenance strength, power and injury-prevention sessions.

100
New cards

When should plyometrics be placed within David’s training session?

After warm-up and before fatiguing conditioning.