1/86
Autumn 2026
Social psychology
scientific attempt to explain how thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are influenced by actual, imagined, or implied presence of other humans
Observable v non observable - social psych definition
observable: behavior
non-observable: thoughts and feelings
measuring and studying behaviors that drive thoughts and feelings
social context - social psych definition
actual, imagined, or implied presence or absence of humans
individuals - social psych definition
intrinsic actions of the fundamental study of individual attitudes/beliefs and social world
social influence
persuasion, conformity, obedience
self-concept
knowing about yourself and that you exist as an individual - including past and future self (multidimensional as it considers interactions)
self-complexity
different and independent ways of thinking about themselves
self-concept clarity
beliefs about yourself is clearly defined
self-awareness
currently fixing attention to own self-concept
self-consciousness (private and public)
accessible self-concept because concern of being judged or observed
private: introspect about inner thoughts and feelings where behaviors are inner beliefs and values and success is personal accomplishments (Western)
public: tends to focus on outer public image and be aware of the extent to meet the standards set by others which lets opinion software others guide behaviors (East Asian)
self-awareness theory
focus our attention on ourselves as we tend to compare our current behavior against internal standards which causes discomfort if mismatch
self-discrepancy theory
we perceive a discrepancy between actual and ideal selves causing distress
self-schemas
cognitive aspects that organize about a person
more likely to act consistently to self-schemas, related information is processed more quickly and easily remembered, fluid (activated differently for different social contexts)
self-reference effect
relating to self-concept to help remember things (physical traits, personality, social identity)
deindividuation
loss of individual self-awareness and accountability in groups due to anonymity, suggestibility, or contagion where reduced self-observation leads to anti-normative or disinhibited behaviors
introspection (TST)
I am…
material/physical characteristics/possessions, spiritual/inner self, social identity
self-enhancement
majority think they are above average compared to others (especially if they are low scorers)
dysfunctional for decisions but good for self-esteem and to reduce negative emotions to achieve higher status
forced compliance study
thinking and defending an argument that they didn't support prior but became more in favor as they had to defend it
cognitive dissonance theory
tendency towards cognitive consistency, holding apparently incompatible or logically inconsistent thoughts produces cognitive dissonance and discomfort, rejected by reasoning with change of strength of belief or changing belief subconsciously to feel more comfortable
implication: conventional wisdom - change attitude to change behavior
social psychology study requirements
research question: specific and measurable
operationalization: how to put it into effect to be measured or tested
research design: correlational, experimental, observational
correlational research design
statistical analyses of relationships between variables by identifying relationships and how well one predicts the other
experimental research design
manipulation and control of variables to identify cause and effect (explanation)
observational research design
observing in natural settings without manipulation to study statistical association and patterns
dispositional attribution
how people explain the cause to their behavior as internal characteristics like ability, personality, mood, or effort
situational attribution
how people explain the cause to their behavior as external factors like environmental, other individuals, or situation
The intuitive scientist: Kelley's covariation model
making attributions based on how behaviors vary
consensus: do others also do this
distinctiveness: does not behave similarly across different situations
consistency: does the person always do this in this type of situation
The cognitive miser
rational and logical thinking requires effort and with limited attention and time, we look for any opportunity to avoid engaging in effortful thoughts
Fundamental Attribution Error
ted to overestimate dispositional attributions and underestimate situational attributions (tend to explain by their behaviors rather than the situation)
Actor-Observer Bias
tendency to see other's actions as dispositional but our own actions as situational
e.g. take credit for own success but blame the situation for failures
motivated tacticians
fundamental attribution error and actor-observer bias: self-serving attributions
stereotypes
generalization of beliefs that associate a group with certain traits (positive and negative)
stereotype attribution consequences
explanations based on group membership because of certain beliefs and explanations are to be consistent (behaviors are interpreted in the lens of the group)
stereotype evaluation/prejudice consequences
negative opinions because of the group
stereotype behavior and discrimination consequences
any action that results from beliefs about the group and can be changed if culture is presented
stereotype threat
knowing it exists can be burden to NOT confirm it because of the fear of performance that might confirm the negative stereotype (countering stereotype may feel like an evaluation)
explicit bias stereotype
speech or behaviors demonstrating conscious acknowledgment of stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination
implicit bias stereotype
using the implicit association test to see which ideas get associated repeatedly to measure implicit bias, stereotype threat, social disability, social desirability, and cognitive control
implicit association test
objects or ideas become associated repeatedly to measure implicit bias, stereotype threat, social disability, social desirability, and cognitive control
prejudice
negative attitudes towards others because of their group membersip
discrimination
negative behaviors towards other because their membership
downstream behavioral influence
how intervention shifts actions or secondary behaviors later in the process
misattribution (of arousal)
cognitive error where a person mistakenly identifies the source of their physical senses, emotions, or behaviors
arousal: sped up heart
motivational bias
unconscious mental tendency where desires, needs, or personal goals warp their thinking, judgment, and evaluation of evidence
Mere Presence Effect - social facilitation
presence of others accentuates the dominant response (presence creates arousal and becomes more focused and thus performs better)
social facilitation: other people present causes one to to perform a task better
explanations for why heightened arousal is caused by the presence of others
evaluated apprehension: concern how they appear increases arousal
monitoring: others are unpredictable and increased vigilance increases arousal
distraction conflict: conflict between attending to others and completing the task is attentional conflict that causes arousal
social loafing
tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than individually due to diffusion of responsibility
can be decreased by smaller group size, small parts, peer evals, manager, mutual benefit of outcome
wisdom of crowds
predictable if aggregated together due to social influence so having no communication and independent opinions to later discuss
groupthink
decision-making bias to maintain group cohesiveness and solidarity being more important than considering facts
social identity theory
self-concept of being a member of a social group and the values/emotional significance attached to that membership
"cognitive" component: tendency to categorize contrast by exaggerating similarities within and differences between groups, requiring IV/DV
"motivation" component: identification within the in-group as "self" and out-group as "others", self-enhancement biases
minimal group experiments
minimal basis for creating in-group favoritism to show bias in resource allocation, trait judgments, trust, and cooperation
group identification consequences for social identity
in-group favoritism (increased liking) and intergroup conflict/out-group animosity (exaggerated differences and inferiority) that can be overcome by superordinate or mutual goal