1/118
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Method of tenacity
Information is excepted as true, because it has always been believed, or because superstition supports it
Method of intuition
Information is excepted on the basis of a hunch, or gut feeling
Method of authority
Rely on information from an expert in the subject
Method of faith
Similar to method of authority on questionable trust in certain figures
rational method
Seeking answers by logical reasoning
Premise statements
Facts or assumptions that are presumed to be true
Argument
Set of premise statements, logically, combined to give conclusion
Empirical method
Observation or direct sensory experience
Scientific method
Approach to acquiring knowledge , Using observations, to develop a hypothesis, use hypothesis to make logical predictions that can be empirically tested, new observations lead to new hypothesis
Induction reasoning
Relatively small set of specific observations equal general statement
Variables
Other factors associated/possibly affecting your observation
Hypothesis
Statement that describes a relationship between variables
Prediction
Statement bout expected results
Deductive reasoning
General statement as the basis for reaching a conclusion
Pseudoscience
System of ideas often presented as science, but lack key components essential to scientific method
Quantitative research
Measuring variables to obtain scores using numerical values
Qualitative research
Based on making observations, then summarized into narrative report
universalism
Scientific observations via accepted methods
Communality
Methods and results are to be shared openly/replicated by others
Disinterestedness
No agenda, other than truth
Organized scepticism
Ideas are evaluated /Available for peer review
Falsifiable
Data can reveal whether they are true or fiction
Testable hypothesis
All variables event, events and individuals can be defined and observed
4 goals of scientific research
Describe, predict, determine cause, understand/explain - BEHAVIOUR
Critera for casual claims
Cause is present, effect occurs, temporal effect, no alternative explanations
Refutable hypothesis
Can be demonstrated to be false a.k.a. outcome different from prediction
Theory
Set of statements about the Mechanisms underlying or particular behaviour
Construct
Hypothetical attributes help explain/predict behaviour in a theory
Operational definition
Procedure for indirectly, measuring and defying a variable that cannot be observed or measured directly
Validity
Degree to which the measurement process measures the variable that it claims to measure
Face validity
Superficial appearance does it look like it measures X?
Content validity
Has all aspects listed and included
Concurrent validity
Establishes consistency between two different procedures for measuring the same variable
Predictive validity
Measurements of a construct accurately predict behaviour
Construct validity
Demonstrate that measurements of a variable behaving exactly the same way as the variable itself
Convergent validity
Strong relationship between the score scores obtained from two or more different methods of measuring the same construct
Divergent/ discriminatory validity
Little or no relationship between the measurements of two different constructs
Reactivity
Ppl behave differently bc they know theyre being measured
Reliability
Stability or consistency of the measure measures should be identical
test, retest reliability
Comparing scores obtained from two successive measurements of the same individual calculating correlation between the two sets of scores
Inter raider reliability
Degree of agreement between two observers with simultaneously required measurements of those behaviour
Split half reliability/internal consist.
Splitting the items on a questionnaire or test in half separate score for each then calculating degree of consistency between the two
Cronbachs alpha
Calculating average of every possible split half combination
Research ethics
Responsibility of research to be honest/respectful of all individuals involved
Informed consent
Requires an investigator to provide all available information about a study so the individual can make a rational informed decision
Deception
Purposefully withholding information or misleading participants with regards to information about a study
Passive deception
Withholding or remitting information intentional
Active deception
Providing misinformation about the study to participants
debriefing
Post experimental explanation of the purpose of the study, especially if deception was used
Confidentiality
Keeping strictly secret and private information or measures Of an individual
Anonymity
Ensuring an individuals name is not directly associated with the information or measurement obtained
IRB – institutional review board
Committee composed of scientist and non-scientist to check if a case is ethical
IACUC – institutional animal care/use committee
Committee to examine proposed research with respect to treatment of not human subjects
Fraud
Explicit effort of researcher to falsify misrepresented data
Plagiarism
Unethical representation of someone else’s ideas or words as one’s own
Research strategy
General approach to research, determined by the kind of question that The research Study hopes to answer
Research Design
General plan for implementing a research Strategy – specifies whether study will involve groups or individuals comparison between groups how many variables
Research procedure
Exact step-by-step description of the specific research study
Experimental research strategy
Establishes the existence of a cause-and-effect relationship between two variables
Experiment
Shows changes in one variable are directly responsible for the chance in a second
Independent variable
I vary as in i change/manipulate
Treatment condition
Situation or environment characterized by one specific value of the manipulated variable
Levels
Different values of the independent variable
dependent variable
Variable that is observed for changes
Extraneous variable
All other variables other than dv and iv
Manipulation
Identifying specific values of the iv to be examined/ set of treatment
Cofounding variable
Third variable that is allowed to change systemically along with the two variables being studied
Randomization
Use of a random process to help avoid a systematic relationships
Random assignment
Use of ranfom process to assifn participants to treatment conditions
Holding vs matching values
Holding: all things happen at same time
Matching: match the treatment??
Scatter plot
Type of graph each individual by x and y interception
Correlation coefficient
Numerical value used to measure/ describe relation between 2 V
Positive relationship
Both increase up to the right
Negative relationship
Cluster around a line that goes down to the right
Linear relationship
Data points collect near a line
Pearson correlation
Used to describe/measure linear relationships when both v r numarical
Monotonix relation
Consistently one direction + or -
Spearman correlation
Monotonic when both V are ranks from ordinal score/transformed to ranks
Coefficient of determination
Squared value of a correlation + measures percentage of variability in one B that is determined/predicted/by relation with other v
Statistical significance of a correlation
Correlation found in the sample is unlikely to be randomly produced
Predictor variable
First V used to predict X
Criteron variable
Thing being predicted (dv)
Third B problem
It is always possible that a third un identified a variable is controlling the two variables and responsible producing the observed relation
Basic research
Answers fundamental questions-testing two competing theories
Applied research
Addresses practical problems effects/causes
Program evaluation
Test if social reforms work in govi education etc
Observations
Personal/social events can lead to intuitons ab the world
Research article
Iam-mrdr ( intro-abstract-methods-results-discuss-references
PsycInfo
American psycholigcal assoc. super specilizied
Non experimental method
Studying thru observation, no causation
Experimental method
Studys r manipulated n controlled-find causal relationships
Operational def of Variable
A definition of the V aka operations/techniques used to measure/manipulate V
Reliability of Measur
Measure score = true score + error
Measurement error
An error in a measurement due to some variable (true score sometimes has to account for this in its calculation)
Curvilinear relationship
One variable increases-other does both
Personal correlation coefficient
Used to measure relationships
Covariation
When values of one v tend to + or - as the other v does the same
Issues w/ methods
Artificiality n ethics
Field experiment
Iv is manipulated in natural setting