1/95
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
George Curvier (1769 -1832)
French Professor of Natural History of Comparative Anatomist
Father of Paleontology
Pioneered the technique of reconstructing entire skeletons of extinct organisms.
Giant fossil mammoth found as definitive proof of extinction.
Work was instrumental in demonstrating a series of mammalian extinction in the paris basin.
Theory of Catastrophism
Did not believe in evolution
Theory of Catastrophism
Series of catastrophes can explain disappearance of extinct species.
Carolus Linnaeus (1707-1778)
Father of modern taxonomy
Developed 1st systematic organization of biological organisms.
Established system of binomial nomenclature for species names
Published Systema Naturae
Detailed hierarchal classification of animals and plants
Linnean Species
System of Binomial Nomenclature
Very formal rules for naming species
Every species has its own unique name
Described using two names
Linnaean Species
Species were the lowest level of organization in his hierarchical scheme.
Occupied a privileged place since it was the only irreducible entity recognized in taxonomy
Represents the essence of biological organization.
All higher categories are arbitrary constructions which cannot be identified in nature
Based on phenotype
Charles Lyell (1797-1875)
Scottish Geologist - contemporary of Darwin
Earth shaped by geological processes over long periods of time
Demonstrated a great antiquity for the earth - still active today
Strongly influenced Darwin
Theory of Uniformitarianism
Theory of Uniformitarianism
4 claims
Uniformity of Law
Uniformity of Process
Uniformity of Rate
Uniformity of State
Uniformity of Law
Natural laws remain constant through space and time.
Uniformity of Process
Past phenomena should be explained as the result of processes now in operation.
Uniformity of Rate
Change usually occurs slowly and steadily.
Uniformity of State
Change, although continuous, is non directional and non progessive.
Jean Baptiste Lamarck (1744-1829)
Early theory of biological evolution
Animals were recognized as being adapted to their environment - dynamic relationship.
Environmental change lead to biological change and adaptation.
Emphasized “inner needs” as driving evolutionary changes.
Lamarckian Evolutionary Interpretation
Changes in environment can result in changes in the organism during its lifetime.
Offspring inherit these acquired features.
Thomas Hunt Morgan (1866-1945)
America geneticist and embryologist
Noble prize in medicine
Early 1900s began to study fruit fly genetics
discovered that genes were carries on chromosomes, forming mechanical basis of heredity which became basis of modern genetics
Fruit fly studies revealed presence of numerous small, heritable mutations
Embraced mendelian genetics and the relevance of mutations for evolution
Laid the foundation for natural selection by elucidiating process of heredity.
Gregor Mendel (1822-1884)
Pea plant experiments
Bred pea plants at the abbey and document phenotypic features across generations.
Published in 1866 but not widely known until 1890s when rediscovered after his death.
Theory of Particulate Inheritance
Principle of Segregation
Principle of independent Assortment
Principle of Dominance
Theory of Particulate Inheritance
Identified genes as units of inheritance
Established many of the most basic principles which underlie modern genetics.
Principle of Segregation
Heredity is transmitted by large numbers of independent, heritable units (genes)
Occur in pairs in individuals
Pairs are, in turn, seperated within the individual during the production the eggs or sperm.
Offspring inherit one gene of each pair from each parent.
Allows for new combinations of gene pairs to appear in the offspring generations.
Principle of Independent Assortment
Hereditary units for different traits are generally inherited independently of one another.
Genes codes for discrete character states
Different alleles are passed on independently from one another
Recessive genes reappear in succeeding generations.
Principle of Dominance
Some alleles are dominant over the other alleles for a given gene.
Dominant alleles are expressed in a 3:1 ration in second generation.
Dominant Alleles
If present, always expressed
Will hide a recessive gene
Can be a combination of two dominant genes or one dominant and one recessive
Recessive Alleles
Must have two recessive genes for the characteristic to be expressed.
Charles Darwin
Medical Student at Cambridge
Sailed around the world from 1831-1836
Major Contributions;
Evolution as such
Common descent
Multiplication of Species
Gradualism
Natural Selection
Fixity of Species
Long held belief that plant and animal species do not change over time and remain identical to how they were originally created
Great chain of being
Abandoned in late 19th century.
Great Chain of Being
Thought of arranged all life in a strict, god - given hierarchal ladder from minerals up to humans and angles
Leaving no room for movement or change.
Extinction
Recognized due to Curvier in 18th century
Played an important early role in debates on existence of evolution.
Alfred Russel Wallace (1823-1913)
Independently developed the Theory of Natural Selection
Founded field of bioogeography
Began career collecting specimens in the Amazon
Looking for evidence of transmutation of species
Worked in Southeast Asia where he described the geographic distribution of living species and their fossil ancestors
Wallaces Line
Jointly published Theory of Natural Selection with Darwin
Wallace’s Line
Represents a deep water channel that separates Sundo (North) and Sahul (South) continental south.
A faunal boundary line separating organisms related to Asian species and those related to Australian species.
Applies to both land mammals and birds.
Blending Theory
Genetic material inherited from mother and father blended together
Seems intuitively correct - offspring look like their parents.
Two Main Issues with Blending Theory
Implied eventually everything would be fully blended and very similar.
Seemed to go against the whole theory of Natural Selection producing variation.
Galapagos Islands
Darwin
Visit was definitive
Beaks of Galapagos finches varied according to island inhabited and food consumed
Darwins Finches
A kind of natural selection was operating in nature to produce most successful organism.
Darwins Finches
Size and shape of the beak was related to diet.
Through generations, the birds had adapted to different diets.
Theory of Natural Selection
Origin of Species - 1859 Darwin and Wallace
1.) All species are capable of producing offspring faster than the food supply increases.
2.) All living things show variation and two individuals of a species are unlike.
3.) Because of 1, there are more individuals than can possible survive. Individuals with one or more favorable variations will have a better chance to survive and reproduce.
4.) These favorable variations are inherited and passed on to the next generation.
5.) Over long periods of time, new species would emerge through the gradual accumulation of favorable variations.
Gradualism
A theory proposing that new species arise from the slow, steady, and continuous accumulation of small genetic and morphological changes over long periods.
Darwins theory was gradualist in the extreme.
Relied on the work of Lyell.
Gradual change (Lyell) + Competition for survival (Malthus)
Salutational Evolution
Evolution occurs through rapid, large scale changes.
Rapid reorganization of the organism.
Major changes can be brought about from one generation to the next.
Championed by the mutationists.
Directly opposed gradualism in Darwins theory.
Adaptation
An inherited physical, behavioral, or physiological trait that helps an organism survive and reproduce in its specific environment.
Change over many generations where a population becomes better suited to its habitat.
Modern Synthesis
1930’s - 1940s saw an emerging consensus between Mutationists and Selectionists.
Mutation and Natural Selection not mutually selective but operate together as complementary factors.
M = source of new evolutionary material
NS = Mechanism that determines which new variations (mutations_ survive and are passed to the next generation.
Small new changes in the genetic material transmitted from parent to offspring are the fuel for natural selection.
Macroevolution
Evolution is a two stage process
Macroevolution
Evolution above the species level
An extension of micro-evolution = evolution within a species.
Evolution is a two stage process
1.) The production and distribution of variation
2.) Natural selection acting on this variation. Variation among individuals differently affect their changes for survival and reproduction.
Variation
Inherited differences between individuals.
Mechanisms of Evolution
1.) Natural Selection
2.) Mutation
3.) Gene Flow
Migration
4.) Genetic Drift
Founder Effect
Mutation
Refers to both the process of altering a gene or chromosome as wells as to its product.
Only have evolutionary consequences if they are transmitted to succeeding generations
Occur mainly during DNA replication
Fixed mutations are referred to as substitutions
Random process
DNA replications
Cell divisions in humans.
Mutation Substitutions
When the error becomes the normal state of the allele.
Established by genetic drift or natural selection.
Mutation Random Process
1.) Although some mutations are statistically more likely to occur than others, it is not possible to predict precisely which of the large number of gene copies will mutate.
2.) Not directed by Natural Selection
Not occurring because they are selectively advantageous / selected only once they exist.
Genetic Drift
Random fluctuations in allele frequencies from one generation to the next due to chance factors.
Due to accidents of sampling caused by random variation in the notes of survival or reproduction by different genotype
Can have a larger influence on allele frequencies in smaller populations.
All populations are potentially subject to random genetic drift but not natural selection - so should be null hypothesis in evolution.
Founder effect
Founder Effect
Extreme example of genetic drift
Genetic makeup of future generations is directly limited by the variation with founding generation.
Future generations will show little variation.
Mutations have greater probability of becoming established.
Gene Flow
Introduces new genes from outside the population
Generally accomplished by migration
Homogenizes different populations of a species
Important in maintaining reproductive continuity between different populations of a species.
Characteristics of a species also affect its capacity for gene flow.
Microevolution vs Macroevolution
Microevolution = evolution below the species level.
Macroevolution = evolution at the species level and above.
Microevolutionary Processes
Macroevolutionary Processes
Traditionally, macroevolution is believed to be simply the product of microevolution over longer timescales.
Small, microevolutionary changes over relying on the four microevolutionary mechanisms
New species made over microevolutionary processes.
Microevolutionary Processes
Natural Selection
Mutation
Gene Flow
Genetic Drift
Operate more quickly and can lead to new species formation
Observable in nature and in the laboratory.
Macroevolutionary Processes
Speciation
Diversification (Evolutionary radiations)
Longterm evolutionary trends
Extinction
Operate more slowly and lead to evolution, diversification , or disappearance of species.
Only really observable in the fossil records.
Neutral Theory of Microevolutionary Trends
Lewontin and Hubby (1966) studied the genetic variation in fruit flies
Found that one third polymorphic
Similar results found in humans
More genetic variation in natural population than realized that can not be explained by NS
Motoo Kimura (1986)
Lead to the Neutralist - Selectionist Debate and emergence of molecular clock techniques.
Has now become null hypothesis in evolutionary research to be rejected before other processes (NS) can be invoked
Motoo Kimura (1986) Neutral Theory
1.) Most of the variation present within a population is selectively neutral.
2.) Most of the changes in DNA or amino acid sequence are selectively neutral
Selectively Neutral
Don’t influence survival and reproduction.
Punctuated Equilibrium
observed pattern is the real evolutionary pattern
How evolution works - hypothesis
1.) New species appear suddenly
2.) No evidence of transitional forms in the fossil records.
3.) Most morphological change (evolution) is associated with speciation.
4.) Between speciation events, the populations remains relatively constant.
Stasis (equilibrium) is interrupted (punctuated) by speciation events.
- Relies on the biological species concept and the application of a peripatric mode of speciation to the fossil record.
- Transitional forms are not identified in the fossil record because new species form rapidly in a small population and in a location that is geographically separated from region of parent population.
New species eventually reinvades the geographic range, marking an abrupt appearance of a new species.
Stasis
little change
Punctuated Equilibrium - Corollaries Important
Evolution forces acts on a small isolated population
More prominent role for genetic drift / founder effect
Natural selection also present, but not emphasized
Speciation is relatively common
Most morphological change occurs during speciation events
Cladogenesis (branching pattern) is the only mode of evolution
Evolution by phyletic gradualism (lineal pattern) hardly ever occurs if it does at all.
Adaptationism
An evolutionary theory that view NS as the primary important cause of almost physical and behavioral traits in organisms.
Adaptation is the objective of NS and by extension, evolution - adaptionist program.
Rather than the byproduct
Focusing on immediate adaptation to local conditions leads to an ignoring of architectural/ structural constraints.
Leads to an inversion of explanation
Current usage is taken to reflect the reasons behind their ancient emergence.
Spandrels of San Marco
A seminal article from Steven Jay Could and Richard Lewontin
Critiques the confusion of cause and effect in evolutionary thinking.
Focused on purpose in Catholic Cathedral
Is there a defined purpose?
If it were a feature of animal, is it an adaptation?
Is it a byproduct of something else?
If it were a feature of an animal, it would not necessarily be adaptive.
If it is a byproduct, then it owes its existence to something else.
It was secondarily used for a different purpose
It is not the reason it exists in the first place.
Selfish Gene
Highly influential book: Richard Dawkins (1976)
Offered a Genes Eye look at evolution
A canon of genetic selectionism
Normally natural selection is conceived as a competition between individual organisms
Real competition is between individual genes to pass on as many copies of themselves as possible to future generations.
DNA precisely replicates itself
Genes that exist today are identical to thier ancestor genes that existed thousands of years ago.
Only genes have sufficient permanence ton be considered unit of selection
Organisms and their properties are only temporary manifestations - only vehicles for their replicators
Vehicles
Replicators
Vehicles
Any relatively discrete entity… which houses replicators and which can be regarded as a machine programmed to preserve and propagate the replicators that ride inside it,
Replicators
= Genes
Germ Line Replicators
Located in reproductive cell
Potential ancestor of an indefinitely long line of descendant replicators
Dead End Replicators
Located outside of reproductive cells
Active Replicators
Has some causal influence on its own probability of being propagated.
Passive Replicators
Never transcribed and have no phenotypic expression whatsoever.
Segregation Distortion Genes
Normally genes within an organism cooperate in the survival and reproduction of the individual
But in same cases an individual gene can favor its own interests about the whole genoma.
SD genes violate Mendelian laws and are inherited more than 50 % of the time
Disadvantageous for organism since they often have adverse phenotypic effects
Selfish genes
Have a huge selective advantage
If inherited more than 50 % of the time they will increase in frequency and evenly reach fixation in population
Fixaton
100 percent frequency.
Why aren’t all genes doing this? Why aren’t they all SD genes?
Occur at intermediate frequencies
Some normal genes were like previously SD genes - many genes that were SD reached fixation and now they follow Mendelian laws.
Homozygous (sd/sd) individuals less fertile
ensures that (sd/+) and (+/+) individuals produce more surviving offspring.
Alturism
The unselfish concern for or devotion to the welfare of others, often involving personal cost or risk to individual performing the action.
A behavior pattern is deemed altruistic if it increases the number of offspring reproduced by the recipient and decreases that of the altruist.
Often takes place between related individuals - called kin selection.
Kin Selection
Genetic basis to altruism - gene for altruism
Suggest that altruism is really about selfish genes promoting their own survival and reproduction
One individual pays the cost and related individual receives the benefit.
Eusociality
A form of social behavior characterized by the following elements
Reproductive division of labor
Cooperative raising of the young
Overlapping generations
Often function as a kind of super-organism
Reproductive Division of Labor
Only a portion of the population are engaged in reproductive behaviors. Other individuals are sterile, usually through suppression of reproduction.
Cooperative Raising of The Young
Multiple individuals, in addition to the immediate parents, work together to feed and care the young.
Superorganism
An entity that functions as an organism but is made of parts that can or are properly considered organisms in their own right.
Darwin supported this notion
Seems to be the only way to explain the continuous production of sterile individuals
Multilevel Selection
Natural selection produces adaptations - can operate at different levels of the biological hierarchy.
Levels / Units of Selection
What is adaptive at one level might not be adaptive at another level
Group level adaptations can form when selection is stronger
has been developed as one explanatory framework for social behaviors across organisms.
What is adaptive at one level might not be at another level examples
Segmentation Distorter Genes
Adaptive for the individual SD gene (increases propagation) but maladaptive on the individual level (lowered fertility).
Predator/Prey
Selection is weaker on the individual predator than it is on the species.
Sentries / Guards
Selection is stronger on the group level (having a sentry) than it is on the individual level (putting individuals at increased risk of death).
Group Selection
Goes back to Darwin (1871 Descent of Man)
Discussing the evolution of “morality” in humans
Groups of moral individuals will have an advantage over groups of immoral individuals.
Cooperative groups are more successful than selfish groups and will contribute more to the gene pool of the species in future generations.
Group selection was developed specifically to explain cooperative behaviors of individuals in groups.
Sexual Selection
Similar to natural selection in some ways but reflects the fundamental biological difference between males and females
Only one sex reproduces
Leads to large differences in how sexual selection operates in males and females
Relies fundamentally on competition within between the sexes
Embodies many related concepts:
Natural Selection vs Sexual Selection
Survival vs Reproduction
Male vs Female Reproductive Strategies
Sexual Dimorphism
Sex - Ration of Offspring
Honest Signaling
Sexual Selection vs Natural Selection
Survival vs Reproduction
Sexual selection can lead to the development of features that seem disadvantageous for survival.
Reproduction as the “goal” of evolution
Survival is the short term goal
Necessary to reproduce
Evolutionarily “invisible”
Reproductive Strategies
Maximum reproductive success
Producing the largest number of offspring possible
Goal for both males and females in all organisms
High Fecundity + High Survival = reptiles
Low Fecundity + High Survival = mammals
Low Fecundity + Low Survival = high extinction rate
Fecundity / Fertility
Number of offspring produced
Survival
Number of offspring who survive to reproductive age.
Reproductive Strategy - Males
Maximum Reproductive Success
Limitation
The number of females he can impregnate
Strategy
Mate with as many females as possible to produce as many offspring as possible.
Exclude other competitors snd monopolize access
lower investment in offspring than females
Higher maximum number of offspring than in females
Males are more r-selected than females
More variable in maximum number of offspring,
Reproductive Strategy - Females
Maximum Reproductive Success
Limitation
The number of offspring she can bear during her lifetime.
Strategy
Be selective in choosing a mate, invest in offspring survival
Sometimes: Exclude competitors and monopolize access
Higher investment in offspring than in males.
Lower maximum number of offspring than in males.
Females are more k selected than males and there is less variation in maximum number of offspring.
Ronald Fisher
Early population geneticist
Emphasized linkage disequilibrium
Showed how male characters and female choice could theoretically be genetically linked.
Genes controlling both male features and female mate choice are both heritable.
Provided an explanation for how sexual could occur and be compatible with natural selection.
Sexual Selection Part 2
Not widely accepted until 1970s
Alternatives to sexual selection
“Good sense” Female choice
“Good taste” Female choice
Alternatives to sexual selection
Just Natural Selection is enough
“Good sense” Female Choice
“Good taste” Female Choice
“Good Sense” Female Choice
Not about flashy displays
More about underlying quality of a mate
Male criteria are more diverse
Increased parental care
Higher social rank
Emphasizes survival of offspring
“Good Taste” Female Choice
Explains why flashy display develop
Accepts a certain “aesthetic” in female choice
Relies an honest signaling by males
Phenotypic features favored by females are accurate reflections of mate quality.
Intrasexual Competition
Male - Male Competition
Taken to always be present
Favors featured that would presumably also be favored by natural selection
Strength, swiftness, natural weaponry, intelligence.
Female - Female Competition
Usually conceptualized as female choice
Females have some role in choosing their mates
May be based on physical features, behaviors, social rank, etc.
Primate Social Organization
May reflect intersexual competition
Male primates attempt to monopolize reproduction and exclude male competitors
In small groups it is possible for a single male to do this —- Leads to formation of single male and multi female mating system
As group size increases, becomes less and less possible to monopolize reproduction
Most primate groups comprised of related females.
Sexual Dimorphism
Large physical differences between males and females
Often interpreted as an aspect male-male competition
More active role for males
Higher levels result from males developing more extreme features
Strongly sexually dimorphic species are characterized by high levels of male - male competiton
Frequently associated with single male / multi-female social org
Operational Sex Ratio
Relative numbers of sexually active males to receptive females at one time
However;
Lower male investment in offspring
Biased OSRs
Biased Operational Sex Ratio
Leads to increased intensity of intrasexual competition greater variance in breeding success, and stronger selection for traits affecting competitive ability in males than females.
Is when sexual selection can operate most strongly - producing most exaggerated male features.
Female mate choice is weaker or is based on features that enhance male - male competition.
Underlying Assumptions
Evolution of male features and female preferences / choice are both genetically based.
Reproduction is the goal of evolution.
Difficulties - Sexual Selection
Often difficult or impossible to really measure differential reproduction.
Do these things really lead to increased reproductive success?
Sometimes difficult to distinguish from Natural Selection.
Sexual reproduction is perhaps the ultimate example of cooperation, yet sexual selection is all about competition.