1/7
Looks like no tags are added yet.
P2 Q1 (5 mins)
Read the question before reading the source so you know what to look for
No need to guess to save time or waste time looking at implications, it always states it explicitly in the text
P2 Q2 (10 mins)
Focus on comparing the sources’ content and inferring instead of analysing language / writers feelings, as that isn’t the criteria of the question
COMPARE - use words like ‘similarly’, ‘however’, ‘on the other hand’, ‘whereas’
Use short quotes and summarise what they could reveal
Make 2-3 comparisons
Use clear comparative phrases like “while source a suggests…, source b shows…” while aiming for 2-3 key differences with evidence
P2 Q3 (15 mins)
Don’t overwrite - do 3 paragraphs on 3 different ideas throughout the extract
Pick 3-4 short quotes with language techniques - you should be zooming in on specific words in the quote (mention connotations / implications of specific words)
Try to offer more than one interpretation to a quote for at least a few quotes; examiners love this
Delve deeper into the language techniques’ effect on the reader
P2 Q4 (20 mins)
Your extracts ARE LINKED, so establish the writer’s tone for both sources! e.g. the writer in source a feels frustrated about the situation, whereas the writer in source b approaches it with humour.
For each writer, find 2-3 methods that reveal their viewpoint and why they are used. talk about language, structure and tone, and compare how the topic is presented by each writer / what different things they are telling the reader in the source.
Don’t just list methods without a comparison to the other source
Write 4 short, high-quality paragraphs, perhaps 2 similarities and 2 differences
P2 Q5 (45 mins)
Spend 5 mins planning
You can make statistics up - just make sure they’re believable.
Use DAFOREST + CHIMPS JESS for techniques!!
Structure accordingly (e.g. for speech, start with ‘good morning’)
Use a range of punctuation, ambitious vocabulary, and sentence types
Try to use an extended metaphor that develops throughout (e.g. AI as a disease) - it helps your writing seem intentionally structured and helps to guide your argument.
Stand heavily on one side
Address your audience directly and specifically (e.g. if you should write more formally / more for a teenage audience / etc)
Structure:
Rule of 3
Anecdote (start with a reference to time)
Your opinion - 2-3 paragraphs (one each for ethos - statistics, logos - logic, and pathos - emotion)
Counter-argument - 1 paragraph (belittle it)
Summary statement
SPECIALIST THINGS TO REMEMBER: for leaflet, letter, article, and speech
LEAFLET: just text no formatting, include a short snappy title (alliterate if possible), ideas in sections with headers (use occasional bullet points)
LETTER: add address, leave a line then write the date, then begin formally (e,g, dear sir / madam), following with an indent. began with name = yours sincerely, began with sir / madam = yours faithfully, sign your signature then underneath your name in capitals
ARTICLE: short snappy headline, underneath strapline (summarises article in 1-2 sentences, referencing question quotes), then main article body separated by subheadings
SPEECH: begin with ‘hello everyone’, end with ‘thank you for listening. Questions?’. Also include 2-3 direct references that it is a speech (e.g. ‘you might be wondering…’ ‘I can see the lady shaking her head…now…’)
Structural techniques
FACTS FUNC
Flashback / Flashforward
Asyndetic listing (listing without conjunctions)
Contrast
Tense
Sentence / paragraph length
Foreshadowing
Use of time (pace, time of day, season)
Narrator POV (first/second/third person)
Connection between first + last sentences
Language techniques
AFOREST
Alliteration
Facts
Onomatopoeia
Rhetorical question / repetition
Emotive language
Statistics
Triplets
CHIMPS JESS
Caesura (poem - punctuation mid line)
Hyperbole
Imagery
Metaphor / extended
Personification
Simile
Juxtaposition
Enjambment (poem - sentence runs to next line without punctuation)
Sibilance
Semantic field