International Relations Theories and Concepts Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/42

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering international relations theories, key scholars, system structures, foreign policy doctrines, and state behaviors.

Last updated 2:27 AM on 10/7/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

43 Terms

1
New cards

IR (Capitalized)

The theoretical study and academic framework of international relations, including realism, liberalism, and constructivism.

2
New cards

ir (Lowercase)

The practice and real-world interactions between specific states, such as the political relationship between Iran and the United States.

3
New cards

Human Nature Realism

A branch of classical realism stating that politics has objective laws rooted in human nature, characterized by an inherent lust for power.

4
New cards

Hans Morgenthau

A key human nature realist who wrote 'Politics Among Nations' in 1948 and argued that utopian ideals lead states into disaster.

5
New cards

Machiavelli

A political philosopher who wrote 'The Prince' in 1513 and introduced the concept that the ends justify the means for rulers maintaining power.

6
New cards

Anarchy

The absence of an overarching central authority above states to protect them from one another; the core structural force driving state behavior in structural realism.

7
New cards

Kenneth Waltz

A leading structural realist who wrote 'Man, the State, and War' and 'Theory of International Politics', arguing that structural anarchy drives states to seek security.

8
New cards
<p>Realism Comparison Framework</p>

Realism Comparison Framework

A comparative categorization of Realism types: Human Nature (driven by lust for power), Structural Defensive (driven by anarchy to maintain the status quo), and Structural Offensive (driven by anarchy to gain maximal power).

9
New cards

Survival

The paramount and foremost goal of any nation state according to realist theory.

10
New cards

Thucydides

An early realist historian who chronicled the Peloponnesian War, highlighting power and fear as primary motivators of state actions.

11
New cards

Relative Gains

A calculation where states focus primarily on the comparative size of their benefits relative to other states when facing dilemmas of cooperation.

12
New cards

Absolute Gains

A calculation focusing on a state's total, independent benefit from cooperation, regardless of the gains accrued by other states.

13
New cards

Power

A state's overall capability in international politics, defined as the combination of actual power and latent power.

14
New cards

Bipolar System

An international system dominated by two equal powers (such as during the Cold War), which realists consider the most stable system structure.

15
New cards

Unbalanced Multipolar System

An international system containing three or more unequal great powers, which creates the least stability and generates the most conflict (e.g., WWI, WWII).

16
New cards

Hegemony

A state so powerful that it dominates all other states in a system; being the sole power guarantees its survival.

17
New cards

Monroe Doctrine

A U.S. foreign policy doctrine banning European wars, new European colonization in the Western Hemisphere, and alliances between Western Hemisphere states and European powers.

18
New cards

Roosevelt Corollary

An extension to the Monroe Doctrine asserting that the United States has the right to act as an international police power in Latin America.

19
New cards

Stopping Power of Water

The physical limit and military difficulty that large bodies of water impose on a state's ability to project power overseas.

20
New cards

Offshore Balancer

A strategic posture of remaining geographically unattached to foreign regions while acting to prevent any single power from conquering those regions.

21
New cards

Buckpassing

A strategy in which a state attempts to shift the burden of deterring or fighting an aggressive state onto another third-party power.

22
New cards

Balancing

A strategy in which a state assumes direct responsibility for preventing an aggressor state from altering the balance of power.

23
New cards

Bandwagoning

A strategy where a weaker state aligns itself with a stronger, aggressive power to avoid becoming a target.

24
New cards

Offensive Realism

A realist theory associated with John Miersheimer asserting that anarchy drives states to maximize power ('all you can eat') because conquest can pay dividends and ensure ultimate security.

25
New cards

Defensive Realism

A realist theory asserting that expanding power beyond a certain point is dangerous, conquest fails, and states should focus on maintaining the status quo.

26
New cards

Kant's Three Definitive Articles

Immanuel Kant's foundational prerequisites for achieving perpetual peace: democracy, international institutions, and economic openness.

27
New cards

Democratic Peace Theory

The theory asserting that democratic states rarely go to war with one another due to shared democratic norms, transparency, and internal institutional constraints.

28
New cards

International Institution

An organization with shared rules and legitimacy that helps states cooperate by mitigating anarchy, lengthening time horizons, creating reciprocity norms, and reducing opportunity costs.

29
New cards

How do international institutions help states cooperate? How do they help to mitigate the impact of anarchy?

They have greater legitimacy, shared rules, pushing back time horizons, creating norms of reciprocity, issue linkage, reduction of opportunity costs, reputational effects for cheating

30
New cards

In looking at the modern day liberal (or neoliberal) version of the Kantian triangle, what did we mean by ‘feedback loops’?

self-reinforcing mechanisms that link democratic governance, economic interdependence, and international institutions to promote peace and stability among states.

31
New cards

international institutions contribute to democracy

International organizations have greater legitimacy in promoting democracy than do individual states; International organizations often make democratic-like requirements as a condition for business, such as with the World Bank; United Nations explicitly promotes democracy in war-torn states (providing alternate means of political competition)

32
New cards

Peace helps encourage democracy

Peace can strengthen democratic institutions. Peace can indirectly promote democracy through creating the atmosphere where economic openness can occur (prosperity).

Alternate Hypothesis: Peace and Democracy; Democracies are likely to win wars, weeding out autocratic governments. Therefore, the more war that takes place, the more likely democracy will spread. 

33
New cards

Democracy helps encourage economic interconnectedness

Finding: Democracies are more likely to trade with one another than other pairs of states.

Why?: Democracies are likely to be at peace (not going to worry about

relative gains). The absolute gains achieved in trading with other democracies

increase security vis-à-vis third parties. Investors in democracies feel more confident that their

investments are secure when trading in other democracies

34
New cards

What do we mean when talking about iterations of the game? In most game theoretic scenarios, as the iterations of the game increase, what impact does this have on the likelihood of cooperation?

Iterations of the game refer to repeated encounters of players within a strategic framework, allowing them to adjust their strategies based on past outcomes. As iterations increase, the likelihood of cooperation tends to rise because players can develop trust, recognize the benefits of mutual cooperation, and establish long-term strategies over time.

35
New cards

According to game theory, which situations, economic or security, are most prone to cooperation?

economic

36
New cards

How do real life bargaining scenarios differ than game theoretic scenarios?

throughout history has this happened?

Actors are not always fully aware of their interests. Also, interests

may sometimes be formed endogenously in the process of inter-

state bargaining.

• Inter-state bargaining often consists of many states, not the two-

sided world presented in theoretical game constructs.

• Negotiations often revolve around efforts to come up with

agreements that will be acceptable to participants. Negotiators

often do not not have fixed negotiation curves, but, instead, act to

produce mutually beneficial deals.

• Negotiators face a veil of uncertainty. They can never be sure of

their own position; hence negotiators in international politics try

to reach agreements that can be deemed as being fair.

37
New cards

IMF

international money fund - to ensure stability of global finances

38
New cards

world bank

reduce global poverty

39
New cards

GATT

general agreement on tariffs and trade (manufactured goods)

40
New cards

NATO

North atlantic treaty organizatioin - military alliance

41
New cards

OECD

organization for economic co-operation and development

42
New cards

G-7

informal intergovernmenal group forum of 7 states of the worlds leading advanced economies

43
New cards

characterize U.S. trade policy. What did we mean when we said that the U.S. had a three-pronged trade strategy?