1/54
e- therapy
Most clinical useful energy range for electron therapy
6 - 20 MeV
electron therapy treats…
superficial tumors
less than 5 cm deep
main uses of e- therapy
treatment of skin and lip cancers
chest wall irradiation for breast cancer
administering boost dose to nodes
treatment of head and neck cancers
2 inelastic collisions w/ atomic e-
ionization & excitation
inelastic collisions
KE can be lost producing:
ionization or excitation
converted to brems photons
ionization/excitation is dominant in
lower atomic number
brems is dominant in
high atomic number
high E
elastic collisions w/ atomic e-
electron-electron scattering
elastic collisons
KE is not lost but redistributed among particles after collision
collisional vs radiative processes
collisional: e- interacting w/ e- surrounding atoms
radiative: brems (e- passing by nucleus)
sum of collisonal and radiative losses
total mass stopping power
Gradient
rate of change of a value (dose) w/ a change position
(basically change in dose over change in distance)
beyond what range is the dose due to x-ray contamination of the beam
Practical range
E/2
(indicated by the tail on the depth dose curve)
most useful treatment depth of electrons is at what % of the depth dose
90%
estimate beam E based on depth dose curves

dmax for co-60
0.5 cm
dmax for 4 MV
1
dmax for 6 MV
1.5 cm
dmax for 10 MV
2.5 cm
dmax for 15 MV
3 cm
dmax for 18 MV
3.5 cm
skin sparing vs e-
e- do not provide skin sparing
(provide depth sparing)
increasing E will …… to percent surface dose for e-
increase
how is field size varied for e-
variable jaws are fixed
applicators (cones) change the size of the field
for smaller fields what happens to the dmax
dmax shifts toward the surface
as field size increase the output factor…
increases
due to extra scatter from sides adding to direct beam
virtual source
intersection point where the beam appears to diverge from a point source
right before scattering foil
e- vs inverse square law
they don’t follow it
because of heavy scattering and no true point source
scattering foil
widens the e- beam
(second may be used to improve flatness of beam)
most e- beam treatments are planned for
single field techniques
beam E is set to cover target volume at
90 to 95% isodose curve
E is decided on what 3 factors
depth of target
minimal target dose required
acceptable dose to critical structures
block margins for photons vs e-
photon = 0.5 - 1 cm
e- = 1.5 - 2 cm
larger skin obliquity = ….. dose
larger dose
higher E = … photon tail
increased photon tail
sharp edges can be smoothed with a
shaped bolus
CET
coefficient of equivalent thickness
what is CET used for
approximates dose when there is tissue inhomogeneities by comparing it to a uniform slab (equivalent thickness) of water
bolus is used in e- beams to
flatten out irregular surface
reduce penetration of e- to parts in field
increase surface dose
bolus is measured againist what
water
risks of overlapping/abutted fields vs seperated fields
overlapping - risks overdosing
seperated - risks underdosing
when e- and photon fields are abutted which side will have the hotspot vs coldspot
e- will have coldspot
photon field will have hotpsot because of how e- scatter laterally
what MeV range is used for TSI
2 - 9 Mev
2 types of TSI treatment categories
translational technique
large field technique
translational technique
pt lies on a motor driven couch and moved across the beam
(or pt stationary and beam is moved across pt)
uses strontium-90
Large field technique
scattering e- through wide angles and large treatment distances
pt treated standing w/ 4 to 6 fields equally spaced
stanford technique
limiting factor for TSI
x-ray contamination
stanford technique
uses 6 fields (AP, PA, 4 obliques) (all 60 degrees apart)
3 dual fields per day
AP, 2 posterior obliques
PA, 2 anterior obliques
90% isodose at
E/4
80% isodose at
E/3
50% isodose at
E/2.5
Practical range (Rp) at
E/2
higher E = .. contamination in e- beam
more contamination
penumbra is more noticeable on what field size
smaller field sizes
rate of E loss of e- >= 1 MeV is
2 MeV/cm