1/48
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Our model of the universe
Our minds contain a model of the universe; our experience (ex. vision) is allowed to update it, but only in certain ways; we often overlook what we don’t expect to see
Gender Schema
Stereotypes of what gender may imply; overestimating height/skill level of men/boys and the inverse for women/girls; same behavior in young girls may be rated more aggressive than in boys
Apophenia
universal human tendency to seek patterns in random information, like gambling
Anthropomorphization
Ascribing human characteristics to things that are not human; attributing conscious thought to animals too quickly, like Clever Hans
Scala Naturae
Fix this after lecture
Naturalistic Fallacy
Fix this after lecture
Human Ancestry as a Cognitive Bias
If scientists are expecting a certain outcome, they will try to make the evidence in hand come to that conclusion; fracture in skull of early human skull was thought to be from other human-adjacent species but was really from crocodile
Cultural Bias
Different cultures seeing the primarily eyes/mouths in emoticons
Gender Bias in History (Darwin, Aristotle)
In their societies, women were seen as the inherently “weaker” sex; chauvinist view led to findings being male-centric
Gender Bias in Recent History
Pinyon Jays: viewed as pacifists; scientists tried to induce fighting, and with an absence of conflict, were forced to focus on subtle interactions between them; they did not find a conclusive “dominance matrix”: however, scientists DID record direct aggression between the species, but not in their discussion of hierarchies. They viewed female aggression, but attributed it to “PBS” (“pre-breeding syndrome”)
Gorillas: need to ask about this
Spotted Sandpipers: females could carry sperm, and showed aggression; early scientists assumed and applied traditional gender roles onto the birds, before realizing that the males were nest tenders and the females could carry sperm
Scientific Method
Observe
Question
Hypothesize
Experiment
Interpret
Diversity of Perspective
Can help alleviate blindspots of other scientists whose life experience may have led them not to consider something
Evolution
Any change in allele frequencies in a population over time
Population
A localized group of organisms which belong to the same species
Allele
A variant of a gene
Gene
The basic physical and functional unit of heredity (strands of DNA that include instructions for proteins)
Chromosomes
Thread-like structures located inside the nucleus containing the DNA
Natural Selection
The differential success in reproduction of variants in a population; a mechanism of evolution
Evolutionary Fitness
The relative contribution an individual makes to the next generation via genetics; the currency of natural selection
Species
A group of actually or potentially interbreeding populations which was reproductively isolated from other such groups
Genetic Drift
Changes in allele frequencies due to chance; a mechanism of evolution
Mutation
Mistakes in gametes that may create new alleles; if new allele increases fitness it will become more common
Phenotype
Set of observable characteristics of an individual resulting from the interaction of its genotype with the environment
Genotype
A set of genes in DNA responsible for unique traits or characteristics
Unit of Evolution
Population
Unit of Natural Selection
Individuals
Example of genetic divergence
Ancestral giraffes spread around African continent, barriers formed leading to isolation, and changes occured through chance/selection
Example of speciation
Reproductive isolation; when those giraffes evolutionally diverged, different traits emerged and then dissuaded the different species of giraffe from intermingling with eachother (smell, looks, etc)
Dr. Russell’s Top Ten Things to Understand About Evolution
The Significance of chance; change is the default
History is important; every species has evolutionary history/baggage
everything changes; variation/flexibility are good bc environments change
“use it or lose it”; it takes energy to maintain structures
It’s all about the genes; nat sel will not cause trait to be more common onless those who have it leave more offspring than those who don’t
Everything is both “nature” and “nurture”; even genes have to be activated to be expressed before they produce a trait
It’s all relative; traits just need to be relatively better than the alternatives
every innovation began as a mistake; there is no plan
Humans are like any other life form; we have unique history, evolve, and share common ancestors
Humans are NOT like any other life form; culture, self-awareness, anticipation of consequences, medicine
Examples of “recent” human evolution
Lactose tolerance increased
Increase in blue eyes/blonde hair/light skin
Increase in Type 1 Diabetes
Decreasing sucseptibility to HIV
Sickle Cell
Decrease in wisdom teeth
High altitude breathing in certain areas
Behavior
All observable or otherwise measurable muscular or secretory responses (or lack thereof) in response to changes in an animals internal or external environment
Examples of behavioral traits
food preferences
foraging behavior (how far to go)
level of fearfulness
level of aggression
favoring particular colors or sounds of potential males
Risks to self vs. risks to offspring
Does behavior have a genetic basis?
Yes
Behavior vs. Morphology
Morphology is more black and white, and more conservative; behavior sees more individual variance, evolves quicker
How do we use the Comparative Method?
Using comparisons across species that have evolved independently as a way to understand the evolution of behavioral traits
Why is the comparative method used?
To see whether two species share traits because they share an evolutionary history OR because they share/have shared a common selection environment
The Comparative Method
A tool that allows us to answer evolutionary questions about behavior; how behavior evolved due to natural selection, and WHY animals do what they do
Divergence/Divergent Evolution
Closely related species exhibit different behaviors
Convergence/Convergent Evolution
Unrelated species exhibit similar behaviors
Phylogenies
Maps to observe divergence/convergence in evolutionary trees

Shorebirds
females compete for and court multiple male mates, males handle all incubation and child-raising duties; scientists went back in evolutionary history to observe where that trait may have genetically originated from
Brains/Plasticity
Brains change due to environment/experience
Non-Adaptive Traits
Not all traits (whether morphology or behavior) are adaptive; they are not all heritable, not independent, selection pressures change, and there’s other evolutionary forces like chance and history
Panda Principle
evolution leaders to creatures that are “good enough” for their environment rather than perfect; pandas have a clumsy thumb made from an elongated wrist bone
Evolutionary Baggage
traits inherited from ancestors that were useful it the past, but are now suboptimal or useless; tailbone, appendix, wisdom teeth, goosebumps
Evolutionary Psychology/Human Behavioral Ecology
Applying principles of adaptive evolution to human behavior attempting to understand what we do; leads to testable hypotheses