Classical Argument and Flawed Rhetoric Study Guide

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/21

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering argument types, flawed rhetoric, counter-argument structures, and classical argument templates.

22 Terms

1
New cards

Induction

An argument type that abstracts a general pattern from a specific example.

2
New cards

Analogy

An argument type that compares two things, relying on the assumption that similar things deserve similar responses or will yield similar results.

3
New cards

Difference

An argument type that draws conclusions based on comparisons by focusing on differences, assuming that different things deserve different responses and will have different results.

4
New cards

Definition


A common type of argument that guides people to feel a certain way about things by assigning them to a category.

5
New cards

Causation

An argument claiming that something causes or is the effect of something else, typically used to convince the audience of something else rather than standing alone.

6
New cards

Ad Hominem

A flawed rhetorical argument (meaning "to the person" in Latin) that inappropriately attacks the speaker's credibility, concluding the argument is wrong because the speaker cannot be trusted.

7
New cards

Straw Man

An unfair or oversimplified representation of an opponent's viewpoint, effectively fighting a dummy adversary that is much easier to defeat.

8
New cards

Circular Argument

A flawed argument that restates the argument rather than actually addressing or explaining it.

9
New cards

Slippery Slope

A flawed argument where the speaker asserts that one action will set things in motion leading to all sorts of terrible effects, like a line of dominoes toppling.

10
New cards

False Binary

A rhetorical fallacy that oversimplifies an argument by reducing it to only two sides or choices.

11
New cards

Steel Man

The opposite of a straw man argument; restating an opposition's claims in the most generous possible way to demonstrate that even their best version is not as good as your argument.

12
New cards

Concession

A rhetorical component that acknowledges a specific point of the opposition.

13
New cards

Refutation

A statement that gives the reason why the opposition is still wrong.

14
New cards

Rebuttal

The part of an argument that offers expert testimony or empirical evidence to back up the refutation.

15
New cards

Classical Template

A versatile boilerplate containing parts of an argument that can be adapted and configured to meet the needs and expectations of a range of audiences.

16
New cards

Exordium

The part of the classical template that provides an introduction of the speaker and the topic.

17
New cards

Narration

The part of the classical template providing the background information over the topic for the chosen audience.

18
New cards

Partition

The thesis and topic sentences within the classical template, which forecast the direction of the paper and paragraphs.

19
New cards

Argument


The section of the classical template that includes the claims, reasons, and evidence that support your claim.

20
New cards

Refutation


The section of the classical template presenting the opponent's argument, which will be countered.

21
New cards

Peroration

The concluding remarks for the chosen audience in the classical template.

22
New cards

Aristotle's Two-Part Persuasive Argument

A simple arrangement needing only two parts: a claim and a reason to believe that claim, best suited for informed, enthusiastic audiences.