explainations for forgetting: interferance

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/8

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:53 PM on 10/6/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

9 Terms

1
New cards

interference meaning

when 2 pieces of similar info conflict with or disrupt eo, resulting in forgetting or distorted recall from the LTM

  • its still stored in the LTM but is temporarily inaccessible


2
New cards

proactive interference

  • when an older memory disrupts the recall of a newer memory


3
New cards

retroactive interference

  • when a newer memory disrupts the recall of an older memory


4
New cards

McGeoch and McDonald (1931)

  • investigate how the similarity of material affects retroactive interference

  • Ps learnt a list of 10 words until remember them with 100% accuracy

  • given an interpolated list to learn which varied in similarity:

  • grp 1 = synonyms

  • grp 2 = antonyms

  • grp 3 = unrelated words

  • grp 4 = nonsense syllables

  • grp 5 = 3 digit numbers

  • grp 6 = no list

  • Ps were asked to recall

  • synonyms = worst recall rates

  • unrelated or nonsense = least disruption

  • interference is strongest when the memories are most similar


5
New cards

list study strength

  • high internal validity = controlled variables in lab experiments

  • real world applications = ?.?.??


6
New cards

list study limitations

  • lacks mundane realism = used artificial tasks dont reflect everyday memory use

  • temporary accessibility vs actual deletion = interference might js make memories harder to access not forget them perm


7
New cards

baddeley and hitch = rugby (1977)

  • investigate whether interference is a better explanation for forgetting memories than decay

  • rugby players were asked to try and recall as many names of the teams theyd played against as possible

  • players who played most amount of matches forgot more team names

  • showed that accurate recall did not depend on time passed since matches

  • recall depended on number of games played


8
New cards

rugby study strength

  • high ecological validity = investigated real world memory in a natural setting making the findings much more representative of how memory operates in evd lives

  • support interference theory = strong evidence that forgetting in LTM is by interference rather than decay


9
New cards

rugby list limitations

  • limited generalisability = rugby players recalling sports match could be a v specific type of memory task.

  • extraneous variables = tracks real sports schedules so less control over external factors like some players mights have discussed certain matches more than others outside of the study)