1/8
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
interference meaning
when 2 pieces of similar info conflict with or disrupt eo, resulting in forgetting or distorted recall from the LTM
its still stored in the LTM but is temporarily inaccessible
proactive interference
when an older memory disrupts the recall of a newer memory
retroactive interference
when a newer memory disrupts the recall of an older memory
McGeoch and McDonald (1931)
investigate how the similarity of material affects retroactive interference
Ps learnt a list of 10 words until remember them with 100% accuracy
given an interpolated list to learn which varied in similarity:
grp 1 = synonyms
grp 2 = antonyms
grp 3 = unrelated words
grp 4 = nonsense syllables
grp 5 = 3 digit numbers
grp 6 = no list
Ps were asked to recall
synonyms = worst recall rates
unrelated or nonsense = least disruption
interference is strongest when the memories are most similar
list study strength
high internal validity = controlled variables in lab experiments
real world applications = ?.?.??
list study limitations
lacks mundane realism = used artificial tasks dont reflect everyday memory use
temporary accessibility vs actual deletion = interference might js make memories harder to access not forget them perm
baddeley and hitch = rugby (1977)
investigate whether interference is a better explanation for forgetting memories than decay
rugby players were asked to try and recall as many names of the teams theyd played against as possible
players who played most amount of matches forgot more team names
showed that accurate recall did not depend on time passed since matches
recall depended on number of games played
rugby study strength
high ecological validity = investigated real world memory in a natural setting making the findings much more representative of how memory operates in evd lives
support interference theory = strong evidence that forgetting in LTM is by interference rather than decay
rugby list limitations
limited generalisability = rugby players recalling sports match could be a v specific type of memory task.
extraneous variables = tracks real sports schedules so less control over external factors like some players mights have discussed certain matches more than others outside of the study)