1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What does CRAC stand for?
Conclusion → Rule → Analysis/Application → Conclusion.
What is the purpose of CRAC?
To organize legal reasoning clearly by stating the conclusion, explaining the governing law, applying it to the facts, and reaching a final conclusion.
How do CRAC, IRAC, and CREAC differ?
They use the same basic legal-reasoning structure but differ mainly in where the conclusion or explanation appears.
How many CRACs should you generally write?
One CRAC for each legal issue.
What is the purpose of the first Conclusion in CRAC?
To state the predicted or argued outcome for that specific issue.
What should the final Conclusion in a CRAC do?
Briefly restate the narrow conclusion for that specific issue; it should not introduce new arguments.
How should the Rule section generally be organized?
As a funnel: broad general rule → narrower subrules → relevant case illustrations.
What are the three parts of a case illustration?
Holding → trigger facts → reasoning.
What is the purpose of the Rule section?
To explain the governing law before applying it to the facts.
What is the purpose of the Analysis/Application section?
To show how the rule applies to the specific facts and prove the conclusion through reasoning.
What should you NOT introduce in the Analysis section?
New law/rules. The governing law should already have been established in the Rule section.
What is rule-based reasoning?
Applying a straightforward rule directly to the facts without relying on case comparisons.
What is analogical reasoning?
Comparing or contrasting the facts of the current case with facts from precedent cases.
How do you structure an analogy to precedent?
“Like [precedent], where [relevant fact], here [similar fact].”
To distinguish: “Unlike [precedent], where [fact], here [different fact].”
What is the biggest distinction between rule-based and analogical reasoning?
Rule-based reasoning applies the rule directly; analogical reasoning uses similarities/differences between the current facts and precedent.