Week 1- CRAC

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
Locked
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/14

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 9:57 PM on 8/29/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

15 Terms

1
New cards

What does CRAC stand for?

Conclusion → Rule → Analysis/Application → Conclusion.

2
New cards

What is the purpose of CRAC?

To organize legal reasoning clearly by stating the conclusion, explaining the governing law, applying it to the facts, and reaching a final conclusion.

3
New cards

How do CRAC, IRAC, and CREAC differ?

They use the same basic legal-reasoning structure but differ mainly in where the conclusion or explanation appears.

4
New cards

How many CRACs should you generally write?

One CRAC for each legal issue.

5
New cards

What is the purpose of the first Conclusion in CRAC?

To state the predicted or argued outcome for that specific issue.

6
New cards

What should the final Conclusion in a CRAC do?

Briefly restate the narrow conclusion for that specific issue; it should not introduce new arguments.

7
New cards

How should the Rule section generally be organized?

As a funnel: broad general rule → narrower subrules → relevant case illustrations.

8
New cards

What are the three parts of a case illustration?

Holding → trigger facts → reasoning.

9
New cards

What is the purpose of the Rule section?

To explain the governing law before applying it to the facts.

10
New cards

What is the purpose of the Analysis/Application section?

To show how the rule applies to the specific facts and prove the conclusion through reasoning.

11
New cards

What should you NOT introduce in the Analysis section?

New law/rules. The governing law should already have been established in the Rule section.

12
New cards

What is rule-based reasoning?

Applying a straightforward rule directly to the facts without relying on case comparisons.

13
New cards

What is analogical reasoning?

Comparing or contrasting the facts of the current case with facts from precedent cases.

14
New cards

How do you structure an analogy to precedent?

“Like [precedent], where [relevant fact], here [similar fact].”
To distinguish: “Unlike [precedent], where [fact], here [different fact].”

15
New cards

What is the biggest distinction between rule-based and analogical reasoning?

Rule-based reasoning applies the rule directly; analogical reasoning uses similarities/differences between the current facts and precedent.