1/99
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
an all-in-one software platform that connects and manages an organization's major business functions (sales, inventory, accounting, HR, etc) in a centralized environment
ERP: why companies use Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems
- as businesses grow, they often use separate, disconnected platforms/systems for different departments
- separate apps don't communicate well, leading to duplicate data, errors, and delays
- this kind of software centralizes data so departments can seamlessly share information and coordinate activities
ERP: Real-world example of Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP)
A laptop company:
- sales: receives a customer order
- inventory: automatically updates stock levels
- accounting: records the sale and creates an invoice
- purchasing: notices if inventory is running low and reorders
- shipping: learns the order is ready to ship
W/ Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), all of this happens AUTOMATICALLY without manual data transfer between departments
ERP: Integration
process of connecting different departments, processes, and software systems so they can share info and work without duplicate entry
ERP: what happens without integration?
- employees enter same data multiple times
- different departments hold conflicting versions of the same data
- inventory records don't match physical stock
- accounting gets sales info late
- management makes decisions using outdated data
ERP: Service-Oriented Architecture
a software approach where large applications are broken down into smaller, independent components that each perform a specific function and can be reused across the organization
ERP: why Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) is important
Reusability: the same service can be used by multiple business processes
Flexibility: organizations can update or extend features without rebuilding the whole system
Integration: different applications can easily talk to each other
Scalability: systems can expand smoothly as business needs change
ERP: Implementation Scope
defines the boundaries of an ERP project
like what departments, business processes, requirements, resources, and timelines are included (and what's left out)
ERP: why an Implementation Scope is critical
- ERP projects are big and expensive
- Scope Creep (uncontrolled expansion of requirements)
- unexpected costs/delays
- confusion over who is responsible for what
ERP: key questions to define before implementation of ERP
1. which departments will use the system?
2. which business processes need support?
3. what features/functionality are required?
4. what data needs to be transferred?
5. what is the budget and timeline?
6. who is responsible for implementation and testing?
ERP: Data Migration
the process of moving existing organizational data from old spreadsheets and databases into a new ERP system after cleaning and formatting it
ERP: why data preparation matters
moving dirty data (duplicates, missing info, wrong formats) into a brand-new ERP means the new system will still produce errors ("garbage in, garbage out")
ERP: 6 steps of data migration
Extract - pull data from old systems/spreadsheets
Clean - fix errors, remove duplicates, and fill missing gaps
Transform - format data to match the new ERP's requirements
Validate - check that data is accurate and complete
Load - import the data into the new EPR
Verify - Confirm everything appears correctly and works and expected
ERP: Transaction Modeling
involves identifying and testing real-world business transactions to ensure the new ERP system handles them accurately before going live
ERP: why Transaction Modeling is important
proves the ERP can handle daily business operations, not just store files
ERP: examples of tests for Transaction Modeling
- creating a customer order and checking inventory availability
- purchasing products from suppliers and receiving inventory
- processing payments, issuing refunds, and generating invoices
NETFLIX: Atoms to Bits
switching from physical items (DVDS) to digital files (internet streaming)
NETFLIX: First Sale Doctrine
law that says if you buy a physical copy (like a DVD), you own it and can rent or sell it to anyone w/o paying royalties (applies ONLY to physical items, NOT digital stremaing)
NETFLIX: Long Tail
selling a big variety of hard-to-find, niche items instead of just stocking popular, well-known items
NETFLIX: Collaborative Filtering
smart software that tracks what you like, compares it with millions of other users, and suggests things you'll enjoy
NETFLIX: Churn Rate
the percentage at which customers leave a product/service
NETFLIX: Fixed Costs
costs stays the same no matter economies of scale
NETFLIX: Marginal Cost
extra cost to make/send ONE MORE UNIT of something
NETFLIX: Windowing
content is available to a given distribution channel for a specified period of time to make maximum money
NETFLIX: Coopetition (Frenemies)
when two companies work together as partners while also competing against one another (Netflix uses Amazon's servers to run it's site, but competes directly with Amazon Prime Video)
NETFLIX: Scope Creep
when a project keeps growing out of control beyond its original plan
NETFLIX: what are the three main assets Netflix has that makes it dominate physical DVD rentals?
Brand, Scale, Data
NETFLIX: Brand power - how it works
- built brand through great customer service, not just ads
- First Mover Advantage: being the first big DVD-by-mail service meant people naturally thought of Netflix first
NETFLIX: Netflix's Scale (defeating rivals)
- beat giants - Blockbuster (40 million customers) and Walmart tried to crush Netflix
- 58 distribution facilities - ship DVDs overnight to 97% of US (would cost $300 million to replicate and rivals don't want/have $ to spend)
- economies of scale - Netflix has millions of users, can spread $300 million warehouse cost across a huge group (every subscription they get is more profitable for them)
NETFLIX: Leveraging the Long Tail
used streaming to advantage b/c First Sale Doctrine doesn't apply to streaming so they were able to offer unique/rare products
NETFLIX: Data and Cinematch
- Cinematch: recommend movies based on customer ratings, keeping users happy and lowering churn rate
- Smart Inventory: recommend movies that were currently sitting in the local warehouse to avoid shipping delays
- Revenue Sharing: studios gave Netflix DVDs at wholesale prices in exchange for a cut of subscription revenues
NETFLIX: challenge 1: no first sale law
can't just stream a movie because they own a DVD; they must negotiate digital streaming rights separately
NETFLIX: challenge 2: media oligopoly
about 6 major media companies control 90%+ of all US media, giving them a lot of power to set prices
NETFLIX: challenge 3: bidding wars
rivals like Amazon, HBO, Apple, and Disney bid against them driving up licensing prices
NETFLIX: challenge 4: windowing limits
movie studios delay streaming releases to protect cash from theaters and cable TV
NETFLIX: longest tail vs long enough tail
- DVD era, offered almost every movie ever made (longest)
- streaming era, bc licenses are EXPENSIVE and LIMITED, Netflix focuses on a CURATED LIBRARY with something for everyone (long enough) and makes shows original to Netflix
NETFLIX: keep pricing simple- what does this mean?
- competitors use complex pricing (ads, pay-per-view, buying titles)
- Netflix kept a single flag monthly fee, keeping customer satisfaction higher than rivals
NETFLIX: Physical Sale DOESN'T EQUAL Streaming Scale
having lots of warehouses gives zero advantage in digital aspects
NETFLIX: more subscribers = more content power
firm with most subscribers can afford to spend more on big shows b/c cost per user stays low
NETFLIX: Hasting's Strategic Regret
making firm public too early (required to disclose financial position, world learned remarkable profit growth trajectory --> attracted two very big sharks: Blockbuster - video rental & Walmart - Fortune 500 firm)
Moore's Law
chip performance per dollar doubles every 18 months
Microprocessor
the calculating "brain" of the computer that executes software instructions
Semiconductor
another word for computer chips
Volatile Memory
TEMPORARY memory used to run programs. Data is LOST when power goes off (RAM - Random Access Memory)
Nonvolatile Memory
PERMANENT memory storage. Data is KEPT when power is turned off (hard drives)
Flash Memory
Nonvolatile, chip based storage that holds data without power
- slower than random access memory but acts as solid state equivalent to a hard drive
- used in phones, cameras, and laptops
Solid State Electronics
- chips/components with NO MOVING PARTS
- benefits: less likely to break, draw less power, run more reliably
Component Growth Rates
while moore's law strictly applies to chips, other components grow exponentially too:
- data storage (doubles every 12 months)
- fiber optic data speed (doubles every 9 months)
Price Elasticity in tech
how much buying/producing tech responds to prices changes
tech is HIGHLY price elastic - as chips get CHEAPER, people and businesses want to buy MORE, opening brand-new markets
Moore's Wall
Moore's Law relies on making chip pathways smaller, faster, more efficient - THEY CAN'T SHRINK FOREVER
3 barriers:
1. heat - packing pathways too tightly causes chips to overheat
2. power - draw massive electricity
3. size - reach physical limits
The Cloud benefits
- easy to scale up
- gives world-class tech to anyone
- saves money on hardware
- rent or pay-per-use rather than buy
The Cloud drawbacks
- latency
Latency
Delay/lag time it takes for data to travel over a network and get a response
E-Waste
discarded tech junk created when fast changing tech makes old electronics obsolete
- HAZARDOUS but also contains VALUABLE RECYCLABLE MATERIALS (silver, platinum, copper, plastic, and aluminum)
Disruptive Technologies
New technologies that come to market with a set of performance attributes that existing customers don't value BUT over time performance attributes improve to point where they invade established markets
The fall of giants
fast/cheap tech makes new market ELASTIC, which acts as a catalyst causing dominant giants to fall
Kodak Case Study
- had 145,000 employees, a 90% market share, and huge profits
- today bankrupt and lost almost entire workforce b/c failed to transition to where puck was going (digital)
Innovator's Dillema
Those running big firms fail to see disruptive innovations as a threat because they do what executives at large, shareholder-dependent firms should do—they listen to their customers and focus on the bottom line
why big companies fail - profit margin trap
- early disruptive tech is cheap and makes very low profits per sale
- big companies refuse to waste money on it when their current products make higher profits
why big companies fail - value network disconnect
"different buyers, different needs" - big companies ignore new tech b/c it starts out serving cheap/niche buyers instead of their rich/mainstream buyers
why big companies fail - sudden shift (s curve)
- tech improves over time
- suddenly the new cheap tech becomes good enough for mainstream customers, offering 90% of the features at a fraction of the cost
why big companies fail - cruise ship analogy
they are slow to turn around, by the time they realize small "speedboats" (startups) are stealing their customers, it's too late to catch up
How to spot Disruptive Tech
pay close attention to how fast/cheap tech is advancing and watch new emerging trends
Removing Management Blinders
stop focusing only on current customers and short term profit margins - see future tech coming
Talking to Experimental Edge
connect with people working on the cutting edge of tech to learn what's coming
Top External Info Sources
talk to top scientific researchers and venture capitalists to spot new tech trends early
Internal Communication
get managers, tech experts, and different product teams talking to each other more often
Employee Exit Warning Signal
pay attention when passionate employees quit to start new tech company - huge sign that a new trend is worth watching
Amazon's Early Financial Strategy
Amazon went 7 years without a profit investing revenue to purposefully build assets that achieve STRATEGIC COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE
3 pillars of Amazon's Wheel of Growth
Large selection, customer experience (convenience), lower prices --> brand, scale, double sided network effects
Double Sided Network Effects on Amazon
opening website to 3rd party sellers attracts more customers, which in turn attracts more sellers
3rd Party Sellers
outside companies or people that list and sell their own products directly on a platform
AMAZON: early fulfillment vs modern warehouse talent
Early - inefficient, money burning
Today - bought robots to run warehouse, efficient, saves time
AMAZON: random chaos shelving rule
no two similar products shelved next to each other - prevents errors from confusing color, sizes, etc
AMAZON: kiva system robots in fulfillment centers
robots bring heavy shelves to human workers, changed system from workers running to shelves
AMAZON: conveyor belts and robot efficiency
- conveyor belts whisk full bins straight to packing
- kiva robots pack shelves close together
wave 1 (1960s)
room sized main frames (gov and big businesses)
wave 2 (1970s)
minicomputers (smaller business computers)
wave 3 (1980s)
personal computers (PC in home/office)
wave 4 (1990s)
internet computing (cheap PC connected worldwide)
wave 5 (2000s)
mobile phones (smartphones in everyone's pocket)
wave 6 (today)
pervasive computing (tech woven everywhere: RFID tags, smart speakers, robot vaccuums, wearables)
AMAZON: Accounts Payable
a bill that says when payment is due sometime in the future
AMAZON: Cash Conversion Cycle (CCC)
The firm's period between distributing funds (cash) and collecting cash for a given operation (amazon has a negative one)
Liquidity Problems
firms that can't generate cash quickly enough
Cash Flow or Float
collecting cash from buyers BEFORE having to pay suppliers
Amazon's NEGATIVE CCC
getting paid instantly by customer credit cards BEFORE paying the suppliers' bills weeks later
Advantage of Negative CCC
free interest free cash that can immediately use to build warehouses and invest elsewhere
Amazon's Golden Financial Rule
sell items as fast as possible (high inventory turns) and pay suppliers as late as possible
Dynamic Pricing
when a company/firm changes or shifts it's pricing based on DEMAND
Example of Dynamic Pricing
Uber Friday at 6pm is more expensive than Monday at 6am
Characteristics of Oligopoly
few dominant sellers, high barriers to entry
Online vs Retail Efficiencies
Amazon (online) is more efficient than Barnes & Noble (retail)
Value Networks
Group of customers, suppliers, and others connected to a business
Best Buy vs Amazon's shelves
Shelf life for product:
Best Buy - 70 days
Amazon - 33 days
Amazon vs Barns & Noble inventory turnover and style
Barns & Noble - 3 turnover/year, average on shelf for 121 days, 30% returns, mix of shelf and warehouse stock
Amazon 16 turnover/year, average book in house for 22 days, few returns, all warehouse stock
Straddling
trying to copy a competitor's success while keeping your own business model/position - not successful/efficient
Accretive
"instant-add" growth - buying/expanding in a way that instantly adds profits, value, infrastructure
AMAZON: Accretive example
buying Wholefoods Market to instantly get hundreds of physical grocery stores
Random-Access Memory (RAM)
chip-based memory, a temporary storage with fast access for executing computer programs and files