1/13
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
FSP and S&S
Dimensional changes only below FSP
Swelling caused by water sorption site in cell wall
S&S with face
Dimensional changes are anisotropic (differ along length)
Axial is smallest
Radial is larger
Tangential largest
S&S affected by
Moisture
Extractive content
Anatomical structure
Density
Chemical composition
Mechanical stress
Moisture influence
Amount of moisture gained or loss from 0-FSP determines amount of deformation
Nearly linear in all growth directions
Can reach beyond FSP if internal stress have developed in too large samples;
large sample might have non-uniform MC
use small, standard size samples to determine MC influence
Density influence (& AC)
Magnitude of S&S increases with density
Larger amount of cell substance, thicker cell walls
Contain more moisture in cell walls
Density affects anisotropy of S&S
Anisotropy coefficient: ratio between tangential/radial shrinkage
AC increases with increasing density (difference in shrinkages smaller in denser woods)
Mass of water on wood
mwater [kg/m3] = r * V * u
Influence of structure
Latewood S&S more because of higher density (up to 3.5x)
Tangential shrinkage changes more because rings are tangentially arranged, especially for woods with pronounced density differences
Influence of extractives
Large content of extractives (in cell walls) reduces S&S
Removing extractives increase S&S
Influence of mechanical stress
Permanent deformation of wood cells changes S&S characteristics
Large compression → more shrinkage
Large tension → less shrinkage
Cell dimensions permanently reduced
Chemical composition
Lignin is main influencial component
Higher lignin → less S&S
Lignin content reduced in high density wood
HW shrink more than SW because lower lignin content
Anisotropy & cell-wall structure
Mainly attributed to cell-wall structure
Secondary wall consists of 3 layers with different orientation of microfibrils
In S2 microfibrils nearly parallel to cell axis
In S1 & S3 microfibrils nearly transverse to cell axis
Swelling in S2 is in proportion to number of microfibrils
S1 & S3 restrain swelling, because different orientation
Axial orientation of microfibrils in S2 results in small axial shrinkage. If they were perfectly longitudinal, no axial shrinkage could be observed
Any deviation results in axial shrinkage & swelling

Anisotrophy & rays, early-/latewood, middle lamella
Rays radially orientated
Microfibrils of the parenchyma cells parallel to cells
Restrain radial S&S
Removal of rays sometimes increases radial shrinkage (HWs)
Difference in early-/latewood results in greater tangential shrinkage, especially in trees with pronounced density differences (ring-porous)
Some diffuse porous woods have higher tangential shrinkage than radial
Middle lamella has high lignin content in radial cell walls → higher shrinkage in radial direction after lignin removal
S&S coefficients
All given
Calculated with wet dimension, dry dimension & green dimension. Answer is in %
Volumetric change is sum of individual directional S&S coefficient, but can be estimated with only tangential & radial coefficients.
Shrinkage & dimensional change equations
All variables are percentages converted to decimals.