1/121
Preconventional (a)
stage 1: deference to authority, fear of punishment
Preconventional (b)
stage 2: reciprocity, mutual satisfaction
Conventional (a)
stage 3: virtues trust, loyalty, kindess
Conventional (b)
stage 4: attention to justice, authority
postconventional (a)
stage 5: higher principles
postconventional (b)
stage 6: "universal" human rights
Morals
thinking (about what to do), feeling (about what to do or what was done), and behaving based on rules and customs about how people interact with others
moral development
children develop an internalize moral standards and develop an evolving more capacity that influences how they think about moral issues, feel about moral matters and behave in complex situations
Piaget's Theory of Moral Development
stage based, explained from cognitive perspective, determined from watching kids play a marble game, 3 stages
Piaget up to 4 years
No rules, children are not concerned with morality, rules are meaning less
Piaget 4 to 7 years
absolute rules, children believe rules are fixed and unchangeable, they come from authority figures and are meant to be obeyed, judgements on right and wrong are based on consequences, break rules = punishment
Piaget 7 to 11 years
children realize rules are made by people and can be changed, punishment should be linked to intent of violator, realize that opinions and feelings of others matter
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral development
influenced by Piaget and more elaborative, children must overcome egocentrism before they can make true moral judgements
Preconventional (a) example
children follow rules because adults tell me, fear of punishment motivates action
Preconventional (b) example
children develop and pursue own interests, notions of reciprocity and mutual satisfaction emerge
conventional (a) example
people value trust, loyalty, and kindness, impacts their their judgement
Conventional (b) example
moral judgements include attention to justice and authority
postconventional (a) example
people realize that there are greater rights and principles that support or are above the law
postconventional (b) example
people consider universal human rights and follow their own conscience
Gilligan 's critique of kohlberg
critic of Kohlberg, kohlberg research on males. gender bias, kohlberg focused on justice and not interpersonal relationships
Gilligan 's Ethics of Care
male and female have different sequence of moral development, justice (male concern) versus interpersonal relationships (female concern)
Gilligan: nonviolence
nonviolence is guiding principle, women resolve conflict between concern for self and concern for others because of their maturing ability to view relationships
Gilligan: girl moral decisions
initially a girl's moral decisions center on self and related concerns
Gilligan: loyalty
loyalty promotes a balance between one's won needs and the needs of others, attachment to parents strengthens and loyalty develops, sense of responsibility for others appears, goodness equated with self- sacrifice and concern for others
Temperament classifications
easy, difficult, slow to warm up children
Easy child
activity level: varies, positive approach, very adaptable, positive mood, 40%
Difficult child
low to moderate activity level, withdrawals, slow to adapt, negative mood, 10%
slow-to-warm up child
varies activity level, initial withdrawal, adaptable, slightly negative, 15%
goodness of fit
respond appropriately for individual child
stage vs. trait theorists
(stability vs. change), traits are stability and stage is change, Stage: 5 traits are not enough
Traits
stability argument: OCEAN. personality is relatively stable throughout childhood
OCEAN
openness to experience, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism,
fear temperament -->
-> impulsivity, activity, aggression, fear personality
approach/positive affect temperament -->
-> extraversion
proneness to anger -->
-> activity, anger, impulsivity, aggression
associations between temperament and personality
temperament dimensions and measures of later personality, some longitudinal predictions, in support of stability
cognitive development theory
gender is inevitable
cog. development theory: work to actively comprehend world -->
-> schemas make this easier, gender is perceptually salient
cog. development theory: need for cognitive consistency -->
-> self-categorization as motivation, gender congruent activities, attributes and peers
cog. development theory: children
children first acquire their sense of gender identity and then display and identify appropriate behaviors
Psychoanalysis
Freud: focus on the unconscious: inner world of feelings, impulses and fantasies, 3 levels
Ego
logical, rational, reality: conscious
Superego
moral system: devil vs. angel: preconscious
Id
life and death instincts, pleasure principle libido--> driving force of personality: unconscious
conscious
all things we are aware of at any given moment
preconscious
everything that can, with little effort, can be brought to conscious
unconscious
inaccessible hold of anxiety producing thoughts and drives
Psychoanalysis: sex type rooted -->
-> discovery of genital sex differences, anatomy=destiny; oedipal/elecktra complex; defense mechanisms, identification with same sex parent
Critique of Freud/Psychoanalysis
best known explanation of sex-typing, but culturally biased, sexist and unable to empirically support
Social cognitive (Learning) Theory
rewards and punishments receive for sex-appropriate and inappropriate behaviors (parents reinforce), vicarious learning (learning through observation), child is passive recipient (evidence that children can interpret and apply gender rules)
Gender schema theory (Bem)
cognitive developmental theory, we categorize and have a schema for gender that is derived from sex-differentiated practices
Bem Recommendation
Teach children sex education (male-female differences and bodies) WITHOUT teaching cultural stereotypes, teach skepticism about gender messages
Things that aid in gender-typing
unconscious bias, cultural issues, peers and media influences
gender typing: peers
preference for same sex interaction partners (starts at age 2 and increases until adolescence), learn skills and rules of interactions, reward and punish based on peers you hang out with (boy don't hang out with girls), play in ways that reinforce masculine and feminine interaction styles
gender typing: cultural issues
collectivism and more shared parenting, other adults will offer gendered toys to children
gender typing: media influences
commercials or the way stores set up colors, types of books and characters and what we teach and buy our children
gender constancy
emerges by ages 5-6, realization you can't change gender like you can change cloths/behavior, actively seek out info about gender and behave according to it, increase interest in same sex models/peers, avoid playing with opposite sex toys
gender neutrality vs. gender appreciation
we should recognize and respect differences, very hard because of all the outside forces to raise a gender neutral child
life-course persistent offenders
begins in childhood and worsens throughout lifespan: few, persistent, pathological
adolescence-limited offenders
begins in adolescence, desists in young childhood: common, relatively transient, near normative
Socioemotional selectivity theory
basic time awareness (universal, forever), structure from which we plan and implement all long term and short term goal
limited/constrained vs. expansive/open-ended time
plays a central role in social goals and preferences in social partners
limited/constrained time
old people but also end of high school/college
limited/constrained time priorities
emphasis on feelings and emotional states (positive and meaningful), focus on present, reduced interest in new information.
expansive/open-ended time
the young people, open future
Prioritization of social goals
people often hold multiple-sometimes opposing goals, goal selection precedes action
Two categories of Social goals
acquisition of knowledge (information seeking) and emotional motives (deriving emotional meaning and experiencing emotional satisfaction)
ethology
study of animals and human behavior within an evolutionary context
Bowlby
father of attachment theory, observed children in orphanages/experienced prolonged separation from primary care givers.
Bowlby: child observation
the children had a variety of emotional problems, mother infant bond is very important, theoretical, differed from Watson
Watson
believed that parents are a corrupting influence to children
still-face paradigm
infants expect responses from caregivers (2-3 weeks), violates law that governs mutual regulation of social interactions
attachment behaviors
crying (distress call), smile (parent feels love and being close), babbling (social interaction), holding on reflexes (safety)
Two goals guiding attachment behavior
safety (staying close=survival) and exploration (child who explores and plays develops skills and intelligence for adult life
Attachment goals interacting
adequate safety--> exploring; safety drops--> activates attachment system
Development of Attachment: 6 weeks
social smiling
Development of Attachment: 3-6 months
responsiveness to a few familiar people, clear preference for one person, wary of strangers
Development of Attachment: End of year 1
working model
Development of Attachment: institutional deprivation
focus on physical needs only, children were difficult to bond to one person, emotional problems, and problems with relationships in the future
Harry Harlow
proving attachment is not only physical but emotional, love is emotional and not physical (affectionate parenting not damaging), critical period: cannot be reversed after 90 days
Ainsworth
focus on ordinary differences in rearing, worked in Kampala, Uganda: careful, naturalistic observations of how babies become attached to their mothers, came up with a strange situation [Bowlby's research assistant]
Strange Situation
studying attachment levels, study attachment levels without ruining child's life forever [Ainsworth]
Psychoanalysis: Attachment
highly affectionate mothering damages children, role in feeding as basis for development of child-parent attachment, watson
Harlow's Monkey study
preferred cloth monkey over wire monkey proving attachment is not only physical but emotional, monkey runs to cloth monkey when scared
imprinting
animal example, parallel to humes
Attachment types
secure, insecure-avoidant, insecure-resistant, disorganized
secure attachment
explore, seek reunion, easily comforted, parent is sensitive and responsive to child and prompt, 65%
insecure-avoidant attachment
explore with indifference to caregiver, ignore caregiver at reunion, parent insensitive and unresponsive, day care kids often look like this, 20%
insecure-resistant
fearful of environment, prefer close to mom, clingy, not easily comforted, inconsistent sensitivity from parent, 10-15%
disorganized
dazed, apprehensive, unable to cope, contradictory, abuse by parents, walks to parent with head down and backwards 5-10%
Later behavior: secure attachment
tend to be self-confident and autonomous, content, cooperative, more socially competent, friendly better leaders, better cognitive persistence, and self-reliance
later behavior: disorganized
psychopathology
attachment contributions
highlighted importance of emotional needs, moved away from behaviorism and from 'crying it out'
criticism of attachment theory
attachment one of many system, ignores temperament, cultural bias (Japanese infants look resistant), over-applied, over used and to far extrapolated
Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Model of Development
made up of 5 systems, each containing each other and all are important to development
Bronfenbrenner's Ecological Model of development: 5 systems
microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, chronosystem
microsystem
environment operating at any given moment, focus on child
mesosystem
a system of microsystems working together
exosystem
developing person not part of, but affects development, e.g., parents' work and siblings' friends
macrosystem
national customs, cultural values, social conditions, economic patterns, political philosophy