1/34
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Potential Impacts From Framing
Shapes Public Opinon, Influence On Policy Decisions, Confirmation Bias
Shaping Of Politcial Philosphies
Confirmation Bias, Influence Of Political Participation, Political Mobilization, Political Watch Dog
Manifestation Of Polarization
Ideological Divide→Media Informtaion Bubbles→ Gridlock → Social and Cultural Divisions → Election Tensions → Political History
Consequences Of Polarization
Threat To Democractic Norms, Reactionary Policy Making, Erosion Of Public Faith, Increased Social Divisions
What Can Be Done?
Media Reform
Changes To The Electoral System
Rebuild Civic Engagement
Reestablish Bipartisan Dialogue
Areas Of Vast Partisian Differences
Role of government
Economic policy
Social issues
Immigration
Race and identity politics
Climate change
Foreign Policy
National Security
Voting Rights
Trust in intuitions
Authotorian
The government generally controls the public and private lives of its people
The government holds powers and makes policies without the consent of the people
Does not anticipate such levels of participation and public dissent, which is considered public rebellion
Gives complete control to the authority as opposed to people's freedom of thought
Democracy
The government in which the people have the authority and rights to decide legislation
Democracy is meant to uphold power and rights of citizens
Citizens participate equally in competitive elections and are informed about public issues
The government upholds and protects the fundamental liberties and rights of its citizens
Dictator
A single leader or a small group of elites holds unlimited power and aims to abolish political pluralism
The leaders see no limitation to their authority and seek to control every aspect of the public and private lives of people
A dictator exercises absolute control over political and financial matters, as well as morals and beliefs of its citizens
A dictator is more focused on individual power and who doesn't respect civil liberties
Authoritarian vs Dictator (Main Difference)
An authoritarian claims to rule for the people under a guiding ideology, while a dictator uses unlimited power mainly for personal control, with no respect for citizens’ rights.
Authoritarian Vs Democracy (Main Difference)
In an authoritarian system, power is imposed from the top without real consent, while in a democracy, power comes from the people through participation, elections, and protection of their rights.
Inherent Threats From Populism
“Us” versus “Them”
Discourage Compromise
Gridlock
Normalizes The Marginalization Of Minorities
Weaken Judicial Independence
Attack on Political Opposition
Attack on Media
Strengthen Executive Power
Political Gain
Break Democratic Norms
Political Violence
Populism Undermining Democratic Institutions
Weakening of Judicial Independence
Challenge Judicial Authority
Manipulate The Judicial System
Attack the Media
Critics are the enemies of the people
Centralization of Executive Power
Populism Undermining Democratic Institutions Pt 2
Expectation of “Rubber Stamping”
Use the bureaucracy for political gain
Demonize Political Opposition
Acceptance of norm-breaking behavior
Promote Political Violence
Potential Positive Attributes Of Populism
Reeling In Mainstream Political Parties
Be more in touch with voters
Communication is a necessity
Grassroot Organizations
Increase Representation
Mobilize marginalized constituencies
Democracy Is Backsliding
Checks and balances weakened
The rule of law is challenged
Free expression threatened
Legal (?) and Incremental Means of Attacking Democracy by elected officials
Emphasize the we versus them mentality
Undermine electoral integrity
Attack the judiciary
Erode norms of peaceful power transfer
Politicize law enforcement
Politicize administrative agencies
Increase political polarization
Tolerance for violations of democratic norms
Actions of the trump administrations
Executive Overreach
Consolidation of power
Target the independence of Federal Agencies
Politicize the justice system
Attack the Civil Service
Question the integrity of the election
Increase state-level restrictions
Attack independent journalists
Authoritarian instincts
Capturing referees, sidelining key players, and rewriting rules to tilt the playing field against opponents
Democracy (Abraham Lincoln)
As a system of government that is “of the people, by the people, and for the people"
Civil Disobedience
is an intentional breach of law for a social purpose. It is controversial, yet effective
Civil Disobedience and Civil Rights
Historical Roots
Role of Nonviolence
Peacefully delaying laws while noting the unjustness of the laws
Example: Greensboro Four - Woolworths Lunch Counter sit-in 1960, challenging segregation laws
Example: Rosa Parks sat in the front of the bus, where whites only could sit
Example: The Salt March, a protest led by Gandhi of tax resistance, produced their own salt, walked 240 miles, the British arrested 60-100k people, which brought awareness to the unjustness, which was a turning point for Indian Independence
Civil Disobedience (Progression/Context)
Often Laws Are Broken->Viewed as a Moral Obligation -> Challenges the Status Quo -> Pushes societies to greater equity and justice -> Catalyst for border movements -> has led to Significant legal changes
Juan Crow Laws
Discriminatory laws and practices targeting Latinos, especially in Texas and the Southwest. Related events include the Zoot Suit Riots of 1943 (racial violence against Mexican American youth) and later Latino civil rights activism and civil disobedience challenging these injustices.
The Shadow Docket
Decisions made by the Supreme Court without briefs
Women's Rights
Coveture
Married women's rights are merged with, or becoming their husbands
Legally dependent on their husband
Legal status as a citizen is tied to her husband
No independent legal existence of her own
Significantly limited women's independence
Suffrage Movement
The women’s suffrage movement was a decades-long, multifaceted fight to win the right to vote for women
Trail Of Tears
Forced relocation of 60k native Americans from designated land to Indian territories
Worcester v. Georgia
a Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the state of Georgia had no authority to impose its laws on Cherokee Nation territory. The decision said that Native American nations were distinct, sovereign communities in which only the federal government (not the states) could regulate relations.
In practice, President Andrew Jackson and Georgia ignored the ruling, which weakened Cherokee rights and helped lead to their forced removal on the Trail of Tears.
Alaska Native: Historical Injustices Of Alaskan Natives
Russia Colonization 1700s - 1867
US Colonization Post 1867
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act of 1971
Violence & Missing and murdered Indigenous Women (MMIW)
Environmental Destruction
Healthcare Disparities
Historical Injustices Of Native Hawaiians
U.S Overthrow 1893
Banning of Language and Culture
Land Theft
Economic Displacement
Healthcare Disparities
Ideal Of Democracy
We The People
“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their creator, with certain unalienable rights, that among these people are life, liberty and the pursuit of hapiness”
International Democratic Backsliding
Poland
Tukey
Viktor Orbans Hungry
Undermining Judicial Independence
Weakening of Checks And Balances
Selective Enforcement and Politicized Justice
Narenda Modis Hungry
Weakening of Civil Liberties
Weakening Of Free Expression
Erosions of Independent Institutions
Rise In Religious Tensions
Populism
We Vs Them, a direct threat to democracy, polarizes the community and society, undermines independent institutions, erodes democratic norms, and populist claims to represent the will of the people.
Populists try to justify dismantling government, checks and balances, which are critical to democracy