1/24
Looks like no tags are added yet.
En banc
all judges of the court (in appellate courts, judge sit in a panel to consider legal arguments made by attorneys)
Notice of appeal
Filed by litigant unhappy with the trial court outcome
Appellant, Plaintiff in Error
litigant appealing the decision
Appellee, Respondent
Litigant who did not initiate the appeal
Mandatory Jurisdiction
possessed by some courts in the US where they must decide cases appealed to them from lower courts
Discretionary Jursidiction
High courts of a state and Supreme Court where they can choose which cases they wish to review among the cases appealed to them
Writ of Certiorari
request made through a petition to allow the court to accept the case for review
Imprimatur
given by highest court for lower court ruling in a given jurisdiction
Docket
set of cases awaiting court action and decision
Brandeis Brief
type of legal brief that supplements legal arguments with broader information
Amicus Curiae briefs (amicus briefs)
third party briefs that originally had no stake in the outcome of a case, but provide informed expertise, but now are tools of advocacy to persuade courts
Dismissal with Prejudice
Court terminates the appeal and bars appellant from appealing the same case in the future, for extreme cases with appellant does not comply with the appellate process
Dismissal without prejudice
Court terminates the appeal but the appellant may refile the appeal
Oral Arguments
Stage in appellate process where judges ask attorneys questions to help them make up their minds and raise issues they want other judges to consider, engagement of appellate judges in dialogue through attorneys
Concurring Opinion
written by judges when they agree with the outcome but for reasons differently than those laid out in the majority opinion or to make a further point on necessary clarification
Special Concurrence
agrees with majority otucome for different reasons
Regular concurrence
agrees with majority outcome for same reasons
Dissenting Opinion
written by judge that indicates why they disagree with majority opinion of the outcome of a case
Supersedeas (appeal) Bond
posted by a defendant that files notice of appeal within prescribed period to suspend plaintiff’s collection of any amount awarded during appellate review
Fact-Bound
appeal lacks significant procedural issues or legal questions
Standing
A group can only bring a suit on its own behalf if it can demonstrate that it is directly injured
Legal Model
stare decisis (rule of law)
suggests there is some logical form of reasoning internal to law where decisions of judges are influenced by legal considerations
judges only want to interpret the law as well as possible
Legal Realists
argue that judicial discretion is broad and the common law can lead to many results
law is compatible with multiple outcomes
Attitudinal Model
Supreme Court justices decide disputes in light of facts based on ideological aptitudes and values of the justices
Strategic Model
sees judges as strategic actors who realize their ability to achieve their goals depending on a consideration of the preference of other actors, choices they expect others to make, and institutional context they act in