1/111
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Ethnographic participant observation and interviews of House members
Fenno’s Home style
Perception of entire district.
See in terms of demographics
Homogenous vs heterogenous
Geographic constituency
Those who typically vote for the member.
Understood cross-sectionally (solid supporters, out of reach)
Longitudinally (who supported last time vs this time vs last time)
Defined by uncertainty
Reelection constituency
Strong supporters, not just routine or temp supporters
Solidarity, even in primaries
high comfort level
often an identity-link or issue-based link
Primary Constituency
Intimates- those the member trusts (friends, family, etc)
Personal constituency
Consequences of how MCs see their constituencies
Time usage and staff allocation
Main goal of members behavior is to try and build
trust
In order to build trust legislators develop a presentation of the self:
qualification
identification
empathy
Qualification
Emphasize background, experience, and accomplishments
Identification
I’m one of you.
“Home Style”
Adopt a style to convey these three presentations of the self but not equally
The Archetypes
person to person
popular local boy
articulating the issues
serving the district
Procuring federal funding for the district can be a great way to increase approval ratings.
About how many times they send out messages
Grimmer et al
If credit claiming works so well at building approval, maybe legislators have incentives to
craft home styles around getting grants instead of policy making
When would home style around grants be the case?
Reps in competitive districts (marginal reps). Claim credit for appropriations.
Reps in safe districts (Aligned representatives)
adopt more extreme positions and articulate them
Voters trust the legislator
more voting leeway (no evidence)
True or False: local activities can be used to build approval among constituents in ideological disagreement
False
Home style strats lead legislators to allocate their efforts towards different kinds of activities like
policy vs federal grants
Incumbents who win reelection regularly take up their challengers priority issues and act on them in congress
issue uptake
Member who introduces a bill
sponsor
Other members who sign on to show support for a bill
cosponsors
Bills are referred to committees whose
issue area best aligns with
True or False: cosponsoring legislation is a cheap activity
True
Consequences for Senators having the power to offer any amendment
greater opportunity to impact a wider variety of issues areas
credit claim
greater minority party influence
Speaking on the House floor is seen as
position-taking
Floor speeches consequential for voting behavior, especially for some descriptive groups
Dietrich and Hayes
The logic of congressional Action
citizens develop preferences
citizens select candidates
legislators select policies while estimating citizen prefs
coalition leaders attempt to influence these estimations
Costs and benefits for citizens perceived three ways
general costs and benefits
group costs and benefits
geographic costs and benefits
Citizen perceptions are influenced by:
magnitude
timing
proximity
Availability of an instigator
someone to help reveal citizens’ stakes in an outcome
The role of coalition leaders
framing
traceability
modification
House rules and procedures are majoritarian and processes flexible
True
Can bills be multiply referred?
yes
Bills reported out of committee are listed in chronological order on the
Union calendar, House calendar, private calendar, consensus calendar
Proposed amendments must relate to the contents of bill
Germaneness requirement
House has increasingly strayed into irregular order also called
unorthodox lawmaking
Omnibus bill
megabills and packages
Why omibus bills?
hide legislation that would otherwise be controversial
pressure president to accept provisions
11th hour lawmaking
Majority party power in omnibus bill
influence megabill substance
give members little time to review contents of bill
bring must pass legislation to the floor right before a deadline
To expediate lawmaking the speaker may elect to consider a bill under
suspension of the rules
Most major pieces of legislation are considered under (House)
special rules
Rules committee can choose the ordering in which bills reach the floor and
set the conditions for a bill’s debate and amendment
The arm of the speaker
The rules committee
Special rules can structure the terms of consideration;
debate time limits
amendment procedure
waivers of any rules
Allows germane amendments to be proposed on bill
Open rule
Does not allow any amending activity on bill beyond committee-sponsored amendments
Closed rule
Limits amending opportunity
Only amends to certain parts of bill
Limits amending to pre-approved amendments
authorizes only specific lawmakers to amend
Structured rule
Which party prefers closed/structured rules
Majority party
Senate rules and procedures are NOT majoritarian and
less flexible processes than House
Power of the senate
freedom of debate (filibuster)
freedom to offer any amendment
Consequences of differences between House and Senate
minority rights
weaker agenda control
Which chamber is more likely to have more polarized committees
House
True or False: in Senate contentious bills are more likely to be worked out on the floor than committee
True
In Senate only one calendar for legislation
Calendar of Business
In senate, any senator can make motion to bring a bill
to the floor
Allows majority leader to speak first if multiple senators seek recognition
Right of first recognition
The Senate has ___ on any debatable motion
unlimited debate
Debatable motions include motions to
consider legislation
proceed to a vote
almost anything of importance
Senate majority leader uses these two ways to bring legislation the floor
Unanimous consent
Motions to proceed
A senator can request that a bill be considered by
unanimous consent
All senators consent to operate outside of the Senate’s standing rules, limiting their individual rights to debate and amend
Unanimous consent
Agreements between majority and minority leaders to consider legislation
Unanimous consent agreement
The primary goal of UCAs is to prevent
filibusters by getting agreement from everyone on how to proceed
Act like special rules in the House
Set times for consideration for the bill:
time limits for debate
amendment procedure
points of order
vote margin
UCAs
A request by a senator that the parties not enter into a UCA
Hold
Holds are a common tactic to block
nominations
Presents a motion to proceed to the consideration of a particular bill
Motion to proceed (51 votes to proceed)
Any senator can extend debate indefinetely on debatable motions
Example of minority rights
Talking vs silent
Filibuster
Minority rights in Senate
Can place a hold on unanimous consent
Filibuster
A motion to end debate (60 votes) (51 for noms)
Cloture (rising today)
Consequences of filibuster
rise of cloture
death of deliberation on the floor
rise of omnibus legislation
Amendment rules in senate:
No germaness requirement
two degrees of amendments
no two amendments can be identical
Without a UCA, the senators can slow, change, or
kill bills via amendment
Sources of party unity
Common ideas among co-partisans
pressure from voters
competition for power
Party conflict driven by
differences in ideas and ideals
sorting of voters
increased 2 party competition
Member of the party shares an interest in trying to make the best ___ for the party as possible
collective electoral situation
It is possible that people are not becoming more extreme in their ideological leanings but they are sorting themselves in a more logical way into parties on basis of their ideological leanings
sorting of voters
Primary cause of the decline in competitive races
Sorting, where people live
True or False: Majority party members increasingly hold party message votes
True
Polarization does not appear to be driven by contemporary events or
institutional differences between the House and Senate → this
includes gerrymandering
McCarty reading
“Polarization in Congress derives from both
sincere ideological differences about policy means and ends and
strategic behavior to exploit those differences to win elections”
McCarty
Republicans now can actually
win elections, leading them to strategically differentiate themselves
from Democrats
Lee
Congress was once a ____ institution that followed routine, ____ legislative procecesses
decentralized; regular order
Today, congress is a highly ___ institution that often turns to ____ legislative processes
centralized; unorthodox
What is a routinized, decentralized, committee-led and sequential approach to the legislative process
how a bill becomes law:
introduction and referral
committee work
floor consideration
repeat in other chamber
conference committee
True or false: fewer bills are subject to formal committee proceedings before passage
True
True or false: more bills are subject to hearings after introduction
false
True or false: fewer bills are subject to open amendment opportunities on the floor of the house
true
True or false: more amendments are being offered or agreed to on the senate floor
false
Today, congressional leaders call the shots on major legislation, what does this mean for back-benchers?
the ideas of back benches require leadership consent to move forward
A flexible, centralized, and leadership approach to the legislative process
unorthodox lawmaking.
Features of unorthodox lawmaking
leaders take primary role
action takes place behind the scenes
traditional processes are adhered to irregularly
rank and rile legislators have less formal opportunities to participate
Power has begun to centralize with
majority party leadership
Why would rank-and-file members cede power to leadership?
Conditional party government theory- party unity
a difficult contemporary political environment
Predicts that a party’s strength within the legislature will be determined by the homogeneity of preferences within each party
CPG
Three benefits that centralized processes have for moving legislation
efficiency
secrecy
flexibility
Ability to choose what and doesn’t come up for consideration
agenda power
Agenda power is concentrated in majority party senior partners
leadership exercises positive and negative agenda control
Majority party leadership power - cartel theory
When the Speaker fails at this (not expedite legislation that runs counters to the wishes of the majority of his majority), it is said that the majority party has been
rolled