1/285
Looks like no tags are added yet.
family
social group and set of relationships people understand as family
family is both :
something people HAVE and something people DO
household
person/group occupying the same place (not an automatic family)
communal living group
people sharing financial resources and living arrangements
cohousing
neighbourhoods that combine separate homes with shared resources and community living
legal family
people recognized as family under laws or policies; definitions can vary depending on the legal context, immigration benefits, common-law rules, and other regulations
nuclear family
married parents and their children
extended family
relatives beyond parents and children
kinship
social relationships based on blood, marriage, and, in some Indigenous contexts, broader kinship systems and ties
personal family
people someone considers family through personal bonds; may include friends or pets, and may exclude some biological relatives
intentional family
people who deliberately identify as family despite not necessarily being related by blood or marriage; often grounded in companionship, emotional connection, and shared experience
consensus family
a family definition based on agreement and shared decisions about who counts as family
family of orientation
the family a person is born into or raised in
family of procreation
the family a person forms, for example through partnership and/or having children
standard north american family
an idealized traditional family model; do not assume it represents all real families
heteronormativity / heteronormative assumptions
treating heterosexuality as the expected or normal relationship pattern
relationships of interdependence
relationships in which people rely on one another for support
sociologists
study society and social relationships
macro
the big picture; examines how society, institutions, values, laws, and social structures affect families
micro
individuals and small groups; examines interactions and relationships within families
theory
a general framework of ideas used to explain and answer questions about the social world. Theories can influence government policy, regulations, and therapy methods
structural functionalism / structural functional theory
views the family as one social institution among others that helps society function. It focuses on the functions families perform and how families connect to other institutions
five important societal functions of the family:
reproduction, socialization, social placement, economic, support, emotional support
reproduction
having children and continuing the population
socialization
teaching children society’s norms, values, and behaviours
social placement
placing people within society and social positions
economic support
providing material and financial support
emotional support
providing care, belonging, and emotional help
strength of structural functionalism
explains how the family relates to other institutions and contributes to society
limitation of structural functionalism
may overemphasize stability and traditional family roles and may not adequately explain inequality or family conflict
conflict theory
examines how social structures distribute power and resources unequally. Families may benefit from or be disadvantaged by institutions, and shifts in power can change family structures, norms, and values
key conflict-theory idea
people or groups with more power may protect their advantages and resist change; inequalities can continue through family and social institutions
limitation of conflict theory
it is less effective at explaining how families contribute to society as a whole
symbolic interactionism
micro-level theory that studies the words, actions, meanings, and everyday interactions of family members
key symbolic-interactionist ideas
- People develop their sense of self, status, and role through interactions.
- Family members interpret each other’s actions and build shared meanings.
- Roles and expectations can create role conflict and role strain.
- This approach can help explain relationship patterns and inform family therapy.
limitation of symbolic interactionism
it may pay too little attention to wider social forces such as laws, class, economics, culture, and social values
family systems theory
views a family as a set of interrelated, interacting parts. A change affecting one member or part of the family can affect the other parts
subsystems
smaller units within a family system, such as particular relationships or groupings
boundaries
lines that help define who is included in a family or subsystem
complementarity of roles
family members’ roles fit together or affect one another
strength of family systems theory
considers how one individual’s experiences or behaviour can affect the whole family
limitation of family systems theory
may overlook individual experiences and give insufficient attention to wider social factors
feminist theory
examines gender, power, and inequality in family life from both micro and macro perspectives
patriarchy
a social system in which men hold more power and authority
key feminist-theory ideas:
- Family relationships can reflect patriarchal power structures.
- Gender roles and expectations can create unequal responsibilities and opportunities.
- Women’s experiences and concerns are central to understanding gender inequality.
bronfenbrenner’s ecological theory / ecological model
explains how people and families are influenced by several connected layers of their social environment
microsystem
the immediate settings and people with whom someone interacts face-to-face, such as family, school, daycare, or caregivers. Each family member may have a different microsystem
mesosystem
connections between two or more parts of a person’s microsystem; example: the relationship between a child’s parent and daycare
exosystem
settings in which a person does not directly participate but that still affect them; example: a parent’s workplace or work benefits affecting the family
macrosystem
the wider culture, shared beliefs, ideologies, laws, policies, and social values that influence family life
chronosystem
the dimension of time and how social environments change. External influences include historical periods and cohorts; internal influences include changes as a person matures
family development theory
examines the family life cycle and proposes that families change through predictable stages over time, with tasks connected to each stage
developmental tasks
challenges or responsibilities associated with a life stage
social time clock
cultural expectations about when life events should happen
limitation of family development theory
the model can be idealized, often assumes a nuclear family, and may focus on only one generation
quantitative
gathers numerical data and analyzes it using statistics
qualitative
uses verbal descriptions, reports, observations, and patterns to understand people’s experiences and behaviour
survey
collects information by asking questions
experiment
tests cause-and-effect relationships under controlled conditions
natural experiment
studies a situation without the researcher controlling the event or condition
interview
a researcher asks people questions directly
focus group
a group discussion used to collect people’s perspectives
naturalistic observation
observing behaviour in a person’s normal environment
participant observation
the researcher participates in the setting being studied while observing it
content analysis
systematically analyzes content such as text or media
correlation
measures how two variables are related; a correlation alone does not prove that one variable causes the other
cross-sectional research
studies people or a population at one point in time
longitudinal research
studies the same people over a period of time
cohort effect
differences related to belonging to a particular group or generation
indigenous research methods
research grounded in Indigenous knowledge and approaches
CBPR (community-based participatory research)
researchers and communities work together in the research process
race
a social category often based on perceived physical traits such as skin colour. Race categories are socially constructed rather than purely biological divisions
racialization
social process of assigning racial meanings or categories to people
ethnicity
group identity based on shared cultural heritage, ancestry, traditions, or history
minority group
group with less social power than a dominant group; it does not necessarily mean the group is numerically smaller
dominant group
a group with greater social power and influence
visible minority
a person who is non-white and may face discrimination because of race. The notes flag that the Canadian legal definition excludes Indigenous peoples
BIPOC
Black, Indigenous, and People of Colour.
Indigenous peoples in Canada
First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples
Aboriginal
an older Canadian term historically used for First Nations, Inuit, and Métis peoples; use the terminology required by the course context
White privilege
social advantages white people may receive in a society structured by racial inequality
prejudice
an attitude or unfair opinion about a group; it may be positive or negative but can still be harmful
discrimination
unfair treatment based on group membership or social characteristics rather than individual merit
stereotype
an oversimplified belief or perception about a group. Both negative and apparently positive stereotypes can be harmful
structural/systemic racism
racism embedded in social systems, institutions, rules, or practices
residential school system
schools that separated Indigenous children from their families and communities as part of efforts to assimilate them
acculturation
the process of relating to and adapting between a person’s heritage culture and a new or mainstream culture
integration
maintaining one’s heritage culture while also participating in the mainstream culture
assimilation
adopting the dominant culture while giving up or losing parts of one’s heritage culture
passing
attempting to hide membership in a minority group and be perceived as part of the majority group
separation
maintaining one’s heritage culture while rejecting or being excluded from the dominant culture
marginalization
having little connection to either the heritage culture or the dominant culture
acculturation policies
laws, official programs, or strategies used by dominant groups or governments to influence how minority groups and immigrants adapt, integrate, or are excluded
multiculturalism
accepting and supporting the coexistence of different cultures while people maintain cultural identities
melting pot
the idea that different cultures blend into one dominant or shared culture; linked in the notes to assimilation
segregation
separating groups from one another
exclusion
preventing a group from participating fully in society
Indigenous family structures
varied across peoples and communities and could include kinship and clan relationships; Indigenous peoples were the original inhabitants of the land now called Canada
English Canadians
historically dominant European-origin cultural and linguistic group with British roots; British colonialism shaped Canada’s history
French Canadians
historically dominant European-origin cultural and linguistic group shaped by French and Roman Catholic Church influences