1/134
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Social Behaviour
behaviour that takes place in a social context and results from interaction between individuals
Theory of Crowd Behaviour
theory proposed by LeBon, arguing that people behave badly in groups because they are controlled by a crowd mind
Contact Hypothesis
idea proposed by Allport in The Nature of Prejudice in which bringing different groups together would reduce prejudice, under certain conditions
Attribution Theory
individuals have a basic need to attribute causality to ascribe meaning to the world, making it clear, definable and predictable
Naive Scientist
humans think and act with dispassionate rationality whilst engaging in detailed and nuanced thought processes for both complex and routine actions
Internal Attribution (Dispositional Attribution)
locates cause being internal to the person ie. personality, mood, abilities, attitudes, and effort
External Attribution (Situational Attribution)
locates cause being external to the person ie. actions of others, situation, social pressures, luck
Stable Attribution
attribute causing the event isn’t going to change
Unstable Attribution
attribute causing the even could change over time
Entity Mindset
belief that traits are stable and can’t be changed
Incremental Mindset
belief that traits can be changed over time
Correspondent Inference Theory
when making social inferences, people try to infer that one’s action(s) correspond to/are indicative of a stable personality characteristic; Jones and Davis
Social Desirability Information
behaviour observed is consistent with, or counter to, social norms
Choice
Non-Common Effects
behaviour has a unique consequence rather than a range of possible other consequences
Co-Variation Model
for something to be the cause of a particular behaviour it must be present when the behaviour is present and absent when the behaviour is absent
Consensus Information
info type in Co-Variation Model surrounding the extent to which others in the situation react in the same way as the target individual
Consistency Information
info type in Co-Variation Model in which the target individual reacts in the same way on different occasions
Distinctiveness Information
info type in Co-Variation Model in which target individual reacts in the same way in other social contexts
Attributional Biases
tendency in particular contexts to make one type of attribution over another
Fundamental Attribution Error
general tendency to make internal rather than external attributions, despite clear potential situational causes
Actor-Observer Bias
tendency to attribute other people’s behaviour to internal causes and our own behaviours to external causes
Perceptual Salience
how much something stands out from the surrounding environment
Self-serving Attributions
attributional bias in which we are more likely to make internal attributions for our successes and external attributions for failures
Intergroup Attributions
causal attributions that people make about the behaviour of out-groups and their own in-group; group attributions, especially among the highly prejudiced, will be biased for the in-group and against out-groups
Social Representations
shared beliefs and understandings between broad groups of people, including culturally held and transmitted knowledge about causal relations. communicated through informal discussion to form a commonplace belief
Heuristics
time-saving mental shortcuts that reduce complex judgements to simple rules of thumb
Representativeness Heuristic
tendency to allocate a set of attributes to someone if they match the prototype of a given category
Base Rate Fallacy
tendency to ignore statistical information in favour of representativeness information
Availability Heuristic
tendency to judge the frequency or probability of an event in terms of how easy it is to think of examples of that event
Processing Fluency
extent to which something is easy to think about or understand
False Consensus Effect
tendency to exaggerate how common one’s own opinions are in the general population, caused by the availability heuristic in which self-beliefs are easily recalled
Anchoring Heuristic
tendency to be biased towards the starting value (ancor) in making quantutative judgements
Motivated Tacticians
people are strategic in their allocation of cognitive resources and choose to be a cognitive miser/naive scientist depending on a number of factors
Categorization
the process of understanding what something is by knowing what other things it is equivalent to, and what otehr things it is different from
Prototypes
most representative members of a category
Stereotype
overgeneralized belief about a group/class of people
Illusory Correlation
belief that two variables are associated with one another when there is little to no association in reality
Outgroup Homogeneity Effect
perception of out-group members as more similar to one another than are in-group members
Temporal Primacy
key factor determining whether a category will be activated without our awareness, in which categorization occurs on the basis of the features encountered first
Perceptual Salience
key factor determining whether a category will be activated without our awareness, in which categorization occurs when differences stand out
Chronic Accessibility
key factor determining whether a category will be activated without our awareness, in which categorization occurs when the categories are so common it becomes automatized
Subtype
when stereotype-inconsistent information is presented, individuals remember it as an exception to the rule
Behavioural Assimilation
conscious awareness of categories can unconsciously cause individuals to act in line with the stereotype associated with those categories
Stereotype Threat
situational predicament in which people are or feel themselves to be at risk of conforming to stereotypes about their social group
Cognitive Load
the effort being used in the working memory
Error-Related Negativity (ERN)
measure of activation of the anterior cingulate cortex involved in detecting when behaviour and goals are conflicting
Dual Process Theory
account of how thought can arise in two different ways, or as a result of two different processes. Often, the two processes consist of an implicit (automatic), unconscious process and an explicit (controlled), conscious process
Decategorization
switch in processing from using categorization to individuation
Reflexive Thought
ability to reflect on the way in which we think
Self-Awareness
psychological state in which people are aware of their traits, feelings, and behaviour
Spindle Cells
specialized neurons in the anterior cingulate responsible for monitoring and controlling intentional behaviour, activated when people are self aware
Private Self-Awareness
when an individual temporarily becomes aware of private, personal aspects of the self
Cognitive Dissonance
negative arousal caused by inconsistency in attitudes and behaviour
Public Self-Awareness
a person is aware of public aspects of themselves that can be seen and evaluated by others
Evaluation Apprehension
fear of negative evaluation when individuals are aware of being appraised by observers
Private Self-Consciousness
individuals with chronically heightened private self-awareness experience more intense emotions, have more accurate self-perceptions, and adhere to personal standards of behaviour
Public Self-Consciousness
Individuals with chronically heightened public self-awareness are more likely to suffer from evaluation apprehension, adhere to social standards of behaviour, and avoid potentially embarrassing situations.
Schema
cognitive structures that represent the knowledge we have about a particular concept or type of stimulus, developed through experiences with a stimulus
Self-Schema
reflects how we expect ourselves to think, feel, and behave in a particular situation, consisting of our perception of our self and incorporating our experience on this dimension
Self-Schematic
A particular self-schema is highly embedded in our self-concept
Self-Aschematic
a particular self-schema is not important to an individual and not entirely reflecting of who they are
Control Theory of Self-Regulation
theory of self-comparison in which individuals are able to assess whether or not they are meeting their goals through self-awareness
Self-Regulation
a deliberate process through which people monitor prejudice-related thoughts and consistently inhibit them, replacing them with a low-prejudiced response
Self-discrepancy Theory
the self is compared with two points of reference, the ideal self, and the ought self, discrepancies between the actual, ideal, and ought self creates psychological discomfort
Actual-Ideal Discrepancy
actual self does not align with the ideal, resulting in dejection-related emotions
Actual-Ought Discrepancy
actual self does not align with ought self, associated with presence of negative outcomes which results in agitation-related emotions
Theories of Individual Comparison
learning about the self through comparing ourselves with other individuals, consists of Social Comparison Theory and Self-Evaluation Maintenance Theory
Social Comparison Theory
proposes that we form a definition of the self by comparing ourselves with those around us because beliefs, feelings, and behaviours are subjective without an objective benchmark
Upward Comparisons
comparing themselves with someone they believe to be better than them
Downward Comparisons
comparing self with someone they believe to be worse than them
Self-Evalutation Maintenance Model
Comparison with someone who is successful results in self-reflection/social comparison, depending on whether that success is in a relevant domain, and on whether we are certain of our own performance in that domain
Social Reflection
derive self-esteem from the accomplishments of those who are close to us, without considering one’s own achievement in that domain; occurs only when the domain of success is irrelevant to us and when we are certain about abilities in that particular domain
Theories of Group Comparison
how membership in social groups contribute towards the definition of our self-concept
Individual Self
attributes and personality traits that differentiate us from other individuals
Relational Self
defined by relationships with significant others
Collective Self
reflects our membership in social groups
Social Identity Theory
when membership of a particular group is salient, social-self (over personal-self) guides our self-concept, attitudes and behaviour
Self-Categorization Theory
extension of social identity theory proposing that when an individual’s social identity is salient, they see themselves as a depersonalized group member rather than an idiosyncratic individual
Self-Stereotyping
depersonalizing, assimilating to group norms and taking on characteristics associated with a typical group member
Self-Stereotyping
depersonalizing, assimilating to group norms and taking on characteristics associated with a typical group member
Meta-Contrast Principle
exaggerate similarities within the group and differences with other groups
Self-Esteem
an individual’s subjective appraisal of themselves as intrinsically positive or negative
Authoritative Parent
typically raise children with high self-esteem, high in demanding characteristics and responsive characteristics
Authoritarian Parents
typically raise children with lower self-esteem, high in demanding characteristics and low in responsive characteristics
Permissive Parents
typically raise children with lower self-esteem/confidence in abilities, low in demanding characteristics and high in responsive characteristics
Narcissism
personality trait held by individuals who are characterized by extremely high but unstable self-esteem
Self-Assessment
people are motivated to hold an accurate self-perception and seek out information which will help them to do so
Self-Verificaiton
people are motivated to confirm their existing self-perceptions and often seek out others who view them in a similar way to their own self-perception
Self-Enhancement
people are motivated to hold a positive self-image and are selectively biased towards information that helps them to see themselves in a positive light
Self-Affirmation Theory
people respond to threats to self by affirming positive aspects of themselves, allowing them to maintain a positive self-concept
Self-Serving Attribution Bias
pervasive tendency to attribute successes to internal, personal attributes, and failure to external factors outside our control
Self-Enhancing Bias
tendency to attribute success to internal characteristics
Self-Protecting Bias
tendency to attribute failure to external characteristics
Including Other in the Self
process in which self-concept cognitively overlaps with the self-concept of close friends and romantic partners
Extended Contact Effect
knowing members of the ingroup who have friends in an outgroup reduces prejudice
Social Change Strategy
low status group competes with the high status group to improve their status relative to that group
Social Creativity Strategy
low status group finds new dimensions on which they compare more favourably
Disidentification
individuals of low-status groups disregard their membership within the group as an important part of their identity
Basking in Reflected Glory
deriving a positive self-concept from the achievements of other group members even if they were not personally instrumental in those achievements