1/14
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
definition
a body of legal rights protecting intellectual creations and commercially valuable intangible assets
allow creators and businesses to control the use and exploitation of their creations including through assignment and licensing
unlike tangible property ip protects the intangible creation expression invention sign deign or confidential information rather than the physical object itself
ip protection is intended to
reward creativity and innovation
encourage investment and commercialisation
prevent unauthorised exploitation and free riding
balance private rights against wider social and economic interests
different ip rights protect different subject matter and have different requirements durations and limitations
however the same product can be protected by sever ip rights simultaneously
main examples
copyright= protects original expression not ideas themselves ie literary work, computer code, musical performance
patents= protects qualifying technical inventions ie disowns suction technology
trade marks= protects signs capable of distinguishing goods and services origin ie logo, slogan, colours, sounds
registered designs= protects the external appearance of products ie Coca Cola bottle shape
unregistered design rights= provide automatic but more limited design protection
trade secrets= protect commercially valuable information while secrecy is maintained ie recipes, know how
geographic idications= protect qualifying products who’s qualities characteristics or reputation are linked to their geographic origin
McDonalds logo and slogan
trademark= a sign capable of distinguishing the goods or services of one undertaking from others ie words logos shapes colours
the Golden Arches and McDonalds name can function as trade marks
protects the sign as an indicator of commercial origin to the company it does not protect the underlying idea of selling fast food
copyright= original expression
may also protect an original logo as an artistic work if the requirements are satisfied
a short slogan may receive copyright protection but short phrases do not automatically qualify; originality and nature of the work must be considered
passing off= if branding is unregistered the business may potentially rely on common law principle of passing off
must establish good will/reputation, mis representation and damage/likelihood of damage
dyson vacuum cleaner= a single product can be protected by several IP rights
patent= patens protect qualifying technical inventions ie how the product works
technical aspects of a vacuum cleaner ie mechanisms and methods of operation may be patentable if stat requirements are satisfied
requires an application and examination satisfying novelty, inventive step, industrial applicability and not being excluded subject matter
providing protection for up to 20 years max
registered design=conerns the appearance of a product ie shoe configuration pattern ornamentation (ie what the product looks like)
hoover design must satisfy the requirements of novelty and indidual character creating a new impression on the reader
uk registered design protection lasts u to 25 years subject to renewal every 5
unregistered have automatic but more limited protection for identical copying
trademark= goods or services business origin ie who made it
dyson name and logo can function as ems because they identify the commercial source of the goods from its competitors ie Henry hoover
copyright= original expression
may protect qualifying works associated with the product such as instruction manuals, photographs, software and code, website contents and advertising material
cocacola original recipe
trade secret= informations which is not accessible to the public/secret , has commercial value because it is a secret and reasonable contractual and practical steps have been taken to protect this secret
examples of contractual measures= confidentiality clauses and nodal
practical measures= restricted access, encryption, security procedures, need to know systems
why not a patent
patent requires sufficient discolsure of the invention in exchange for a period of exclusive rights whereas a trade secret does not require public disclosure and can potentially last indefinitely provided the information remains secret
therefore a business would prefer secrecy where discolsure would undermine their commercial advantage
moral justification
ip recognises the creators personal connection with their work and protects certain private/personal interests
copyright moral rights include
paternity= right to be identified as the author in qualifying circumstances
integrity= protection against derogatory treatment ie parody works
protection against false attribution
however moral rights are subjectt to stat qualifications and exceptions
economic justification
IP can provide incentives for
research and development
creativity
inventstment
production
commercialisation
ip protects against free riding
without protection competitors may be able to copy successful innovations without bearing the original devlopment costs
ip roots therefore allow creators to recover investment through exploitation liscencing and commercialisation
ARM example
arms business model demonstrates how ip can be commercialised through liscencing product technology rather than necessarily manufacturing the final product itself
social justification
Ip encourages the creation and dissemination of
technology
medicines
scientific developments
creative works
IP does not necessarily require permanent secrecy or restriction
different rights allow controlled use through mechanisms such as liscencing open source models and Creative Commons listening
IP can all provide consumers with information
trademarks provide information about comercial roigin and in some cases such as fair-trade it provides standards and characteristics ossiciated with goods
balancing private and public interests
ip rights are not absolute
the law imposes limitations, exceptions, duration limits and requirements designed to balance private rights against wider public interests
for example
copyright eventually expires
patents expire after an initial 5 year period if not used
trademarks require renewal
design rights have limited durations ie max 20 years
trade secrets depend on continued secrecy
compare and contrast
the fundamental distinction is the subject matter they protect
patent= how does it work
design= what does it look like
copyright= what original expression has been created
trademark= how do consumers identify its commercial source
trade secret= what valuable info is being kept secret
gi= what geo origin is linked the the products qualities characteristics or reputation
IP right | What it protects | How protection arises | Duration / key feature |
|---|
Copyright | Original qualifying literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, films, sound recordings etc. | Generally automatic if requirements are satisfied | Generally life of author + international 70 years or eu 50 years for literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works |
Patent | Qualifying technical inventions | Application and examination | Generally up to 20 years, subject to renewal and requirements |
Registered trade mark | Signs distinguishing goods/services | Registration | 10 years at a time, renewable indefinitely |
Unregistered trade mark | Protectable goodwill through passing off | Arises through use/goodwill rather than registration | No fixed statutory term; depends on continuing goodwill |
Registered design | Appearance of a product | Registration | Up to 25 years, renewed every 5 years |
UK unregistered design right | Shape and configuration of qualifying 3D products | Automatic where requirements are satisfied | Generally whichever expires first: 10 years from end of year of first sale or 15 years from end of year of creation; licence-of-right rules apply in final 5 years |
Supplementary unregistered design | Appearance of a product following qualifying disclosure | Automatic | 3 years from disclosure |
Trade secret/confidential information | Secret commercially valuable information | Secrecy + reasonable steps to maintain it | Potentially indefinite, but protection depends on secrecy |
GI | Qualifying products linked to geographical origin | Protection under the relevant GI scheme | Depends on the applicable GI regime |
Copying the source code
issue= copyright protects the expression of an idea not the underlying idea itself
software code can be protected by copyright as a literary work
copying the actual source code may infringe copyright however independently developing a new program based on the same general smartwatch idea would not necessarily infringe
if the former employee copied the code without permission this may constitute infringement
ownership= if the code was created by an employee in the course of employement the employer will generally be the first owner of copyright subject to any agreement to the contrary
therefore if the employee created the code for baboon in employement Babylon is likely to own the copyright however the employement contract and precise circumstances should be checked
remedies
injection
damages
account for profits
orders relating to infringing copies and materials ie destruction or delivery
registering a similar logo= trademark opposition/invalidity
trade mark protects a sign capable of distinguishing a good/services commercial origin
If BabazonTech already owns a trade mark:
Registering the mark first may give BabazonTech stronger protection against a later similar mark. A later mark may potentially infringe under where the marks are sufficiently similar, the relevant goods/services overlap, and there is a likelihood of consumer confusion.
Trade mark registration and trade mark infringement are separate issues.
. If the former employee has only applied to register a similar mark, BabazonTech may potentially oppose the application. The application itself would not automatically constitute trade mark infringement.
If the former employee’s mark has already been registered , BabazonTech may potentially seek invalidity/cancellation and/or bring infringement proceedings, depending on the circumstances.
However, this would depend on the scope of BabazonTech’s existing rights, the degree of similarity between the marks, the relevant goods and services, and the surrounding circumstances.
If BabazonTech’s mark is unregistered:
BabazonTech may potentially rely on the common-law action of passing off, provided it can establish the necessary elements, including goodwill/reputation, misrepresentation, and damage.
remedies
injection
damages or account for profits
opposition/invalidity proceedings for registration attempt
trademark infringement proceedings for use
revealing and munfacuring secrets= trade secrets
trade secrets= the Manu info may qualify if it is a secret, has commercial value because of its secrecy and there are reasonable steps taken to maintain its secrecy ie contractually or practically ie encryption restricted access
trade secret protection can potentially continue indefinitely but only while the info retains its confidential character
the former employees discolsure may constitute unlawful acquisition use of discolsure where the legal requirements are satisfied
the fact the person is a former employee does not automatically end the confidentiality obligation, the precise contractual and legal duties must be examined ie nodal or confidentiality clauses
producing an identical watch design= design rights
design rights= the external appearance of the smartwatch may be protected by registered or unregistered design rights depending on the facts
registered= protects qualifying features of a products appearance for up to 25 years subject to renewal levy 5
if the former employee produces a product falling within the scope of the reg design this may constitute infringement especially if the competing product does not create a different overall impression on the user (not merely copying an abstract(
unregstered= arises automatically and protects the appearance of a product fr 3 years following qualifying discolsure. its duration is more limited and is primarily concerned with copying
therefore the precise protection depends on
whether it was registered or unregistered
whether copying can be established
when it was disclosed
what aspect os being copied
remedies