1/50
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Three pillars of sustainability and their intersection
SPC expanded key design quality:
Term: Biodegradable
Term: Degradable
Term: Compostable
Term: Photodegradable
Qualifying claims for “recyclable” and “recycled content”
Green Guides
Designing for recovery
Term: Cascade recycling
Term: Upcycling
Term: Downcycling
Term: Recycling
Term: Chain of Custody/Mass Balance
Green-Washing: Sin of Hidden Trade-Off
A claim suggesting that a product is “green” based on a narrow set of attributes without attention to other important environmental issues
Example: Sin of Hidden Trade-Off
Paper is not necessarily environmentally preferable just because it comes from a sustainably-harvested forest. Other important environmental issues in the paper-making, or chlorine use in bleaching may be equally important
Green-Washing: Sin of Irrelevance
An environmental claim that may be truthful but is unimportant or unhelpful for consumers seeking environmentally preferable products
Example: Sin of Irrelevance
“CFC-free.” This is frequent claim despite the fact that CFCs are banned by law
Green-Washing: Sin of No Proof
An environmental claim that cannot be substantiated by easily accessible supporting information or by a reliable third-party certification
Example: Sin of No Proof
Facial tissues or toilet tissue products that claim various percentages of post-consumer recycled content without providing evidence
Green-Washing: Sin of Fibbing
Environmental claims that are simply false
Example: Sin of Fibbing
Products falsely claiming to be Energy Star certified or registered
Green-Washing: Sin of Vagueness
A claim that is so poorly defined or broad that its real meaning is likely to be misunderstood by the consumer
Example: Sin of Vagueness
“All-natural.” Arsenic, uranium, mercury, and formaldehyde are all naturally occurring, and poisonous. “All-natural” isn’t necessarily “green”
Green-Washing: Sin of Lesser of Two Evils
A claim that may be true within the product category, but that risks distracting the consumer from the greater environmental impacts of the category as a whole.
Example: Sin of Lesser of Two Evils
Organic cigarettes and fuel-efficient sports-utility vehicles
Green-Washing: Sin of Worshiping False Labels
A product that, through either words or images, gives the impression of a third-party endorsement where no such endorsement actually exists; fake labels, in other words
Example: Sin of Worshiping False Labels
Manufacturers who add their own label to a product with images and statements such as, “this product fights global warming”
Externality of environmental impacts
Ecological Footprint
True sustainability
Extended Producer Responsibility
Term: Recyclable
Why are plastics used in packaging and what are the challenges with recycling them?
How are metals separated in the material recovery facility?
Operations of MRF and the challenges these facilities face
Preferred order of the Waste Hierarchy (Most preferred to least preferred)
Source Reduction and Reuse, Recycling/Composting, Energy Recovery, Treatment and Disposal
Why are certain waste management methods preferred over others?
Why is sustainability an important topic for packaging?
Term: Sustainable Packaging
Beneficial, safe and healthy for individuals and communities throughout its lifecycle
Able to meet market criteria for performance and cost
Sourced, manufactured, transported and recycled using renewable energy
Able to maximize the use of renewable or recycled source materials
Manufactured using clean products technologies and best practices
Made from materials healthy in all probable end-of-life scenarios
Physically designed to optimize materials and energy
effectively recovered and utilized in biological and/or industrial cradle-to-cradle cycles
Packaging Law and Regulations: Upstream Measures
Aimed at reducing packaging through design and manufacturing
Upstream: Prevention of Packaging Formation: Bans and Restrictions
Prohibition of items such as shopping bag, expanded polystyrene foam, PVC, electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE)
Upstream: Prevention of Packaging Formation: Phase Out
Prevention of the creation of new products, through existing products may continue to be used
Upstream: Source Reduction
Reduce the amount of raw materials and energy that go into producing products
Upstream: Source Reduction: Empty Space
Limit the amount of void space surrounding the product in packaging
Upstream: Source Reduction: Recycled Content Mandates
Requires manufacturers to use a certain percentage of recycled in their products
Upstream: Source Reduction: Reusable/Refillable Mandates
Requires manufacturing so that returned products from consumers, such as bottles, are reusable
Upstream: Source Reduction: Lightweighting
Designing to make packaging lighter
Packaging Law and Regulations: Downstream Measures
Aimed at reducing end of life products that go into the waste stream
Packaging Law and Regulations: Downstream Measure: Product Take Back/Extended Producer Responsibility (ERP)
Manufacturers are financially responsible for the disposal of their products post consumption
Upstream: Source Reduction: Fees & Deposits
A momentary charge imposed on consumers to purchase or “lease” packaging such as bags or bottles