1/50
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Bateman Principal (is for males not women)
More mating opportunities → higher reproductive success
Men should have the adaptation to increase partner number
More interest in novelty
More new partners
More long-term mating contexts
Met get more choosy when picking a mate
Preference for novelty across culture
Men still prefer a high number of sex partners cross culturally
Sexual regret for women
More often regret saying yes to casual sex
Sexual regret for men
More often regret saying no to casual sex
Sexual regret in Norway
Still exist in gender equal countries
Mens’s short-term mating psychology should be sensitive to novelty
Pay offs for novel females are higher than for familiar females
Coolidge Effect
Renewed sexual interest when a new, receptive female is introduced
Attraction-Reduction effect
“Post-nut clarity”
Most often seen in males
Men’s sexual fantasies
Multiple partners, strangers, no commitment
Rapidly move from meeting to an explicit sexual encounter
Womens sexual fantasies
A single partner they currently or have dated in the past
Fantasies build slowly and did not always involve explicit genital sexual activity
Dating Apps
Men like a lot of profiles
Women are more selective
Women receive far more matches
Sexual over-perception bias
Men over-perceive arousal in photos
Women under-perceive arousal
Men over-perceive arousal more when the woman was more physically attractive
Closing time phenomenon
Women became more attractive at the end of the night because men were losing their opportunity
As mating opportunities decrease…
Available options become more attractive
Selective attunement to fertility cues
Men in short-term mating and Long-term mating choose to look at a woman’s body instead of her face because the body reveals more fertility cues than the face
Selective attunement in women
Women in short-term mating and long-term mating choose to look at a man’s face
Attracting short-term mates
Conspicuous consumption
Risky displays ← Showing off
Peripheral male strategy- Gamma Mates
More feminine, but gaining access to women because people think he’s gay
Metrosexual
Hangs out with Alpha Males
Knowledge of a person’s mate preferences
Allows a prediction of that person’s biological sex
Hypotheses of the functions of homosexuality
Dual mating strategy
Kin Altruism theory
Alliance formation theory
Pleiotropic theories of homosexuality
Female fertility hypothesis
Kin Altruism theory
Augmenting fitness via lateral investment in relatives
Pleiotropic theories of homosexuality
Genes yield advantage in typical genetic environmental contexts
Female fertility hypothesis (Has most evidence backing it)
Mothers and aunts of gay men average 2.7 children (vs. 2.3 children)
“Gay” genes may increase men’s and women’s attraction to men
Men are not united as a group to keep women down
Individual men have conflict with individual women and vice versa
Patriarchy
Men trying to out compete other men for resources to get access to women
Battle of the sexes
Epiphenomenon emerging from conflict at an individual level
Men’s prefered mating strategies can interfere with women’s preferred strategies, and vice versa
Can lead to conflict between the sexes
Strategic interference
One’s preferred strategy is different from another person’s preferred strategy, which can lead to conflict
i.e. Men lying about commitment level to gain sexual access to women
Choosing one’s mate offers clear adaptive benefits
Men and women choose mates based on criteria that have implications for fitness
Being coerced into mating with someone that one did not choose
Is very costly especially for women because she would have to carry a pregnancy for 9 months
Women evaluation sexual coercion
Rated as almost the most traumatic thing a women can experience
Men evaluation sexual coercion
Rated lower than women
Sexual coercion would benefit…
Men because there is no cost
Sexual coercion perpetrators
Overwhelmingly male
Majority of women
Have experienced one for of sexual aggression
Rape
Ultimate act of sexual aggression
About sexual access without consent ← Not soley about power
Eliminating women’s right to choose sex partners
Deeply costly
Deep cost
Deep psychological pain/trauma
Victims of forced sex
Disproportionately young ← years in fertility prime
Men who rape
Have a lot of previous sexual partners ← not the ‘loser’ type of men
Rape pregnancy rate
Is over 2x higher than consensual sex, because men pick up on ovulating cues when choosing a vicitm
Marital rape
Most likely when infidelity suspected and around a breakup
When is rape seen in other species
When the females are choosy
Water fowl
Females adapted dead-end sacs to counteract male sexual aggression
Male victims of sexual assault
Lower frequency of women
1 out of 10 rape victim is male
Men can be assaulted by women but…
Perpetrators are typically other men
Sexual asssault rate in LGBTQ community
Are very high
Gay and bisexual men and women are the most common victims
Fear magnitude → positively related to costs (impacts fitness)
Women fear stranger rape more than acquaintance rape, despite the higher likelihood of acquaintance rape
Women are victimized more during peak fertility
Ovulating women engage in fewer risky activities
:Psychological pain from rape experiences
Very traumatizing
Greatest near lifetime high fertility