J PROCEDURE, PUBLIC BODIES JUSTICABILITY AND OUSTER CLASUSES

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/25

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards

What are the to stages of judicial review?

  • permission stage

  • Substantive hearing


2
New cards

What happens at the permission stage?

  • the court assesses whether the claim is arguable and procedurally valid


3
New cards

What happens at the substantive hearing?

  • the court determines whether the challenged conduct was unlawful


4
New cards

Which CPR part governs judicial review ?

CPR part 54

5
New cards

What is the purpose of the JR pre action protocol?

  • to encourage early resolution and identify issues before proceedings


6
New cards

What is the general JR time limit under CPR 54.5?

  • promptly

  • Normally three months of the grounds arising


7
New cards

Can parties extend the CPR 54.5 deadline by agreement?

No

8
New cards

What must a claimant demonstrate to obtain JR permission?

  • an arguable case

  • Meeting procedural requirements

  • Including time and standing


9
New cards

What does standing mean in judicial review/?

  • the claimant has sufficient interest in the matter


10
New cards

Why is judicial review described as a last resort?

  • suitable alternative remedies should be used first


11
New cards

What are the seven key JR questions?

  • public body

  • Public law

  • Justiciability

  • Standing

  • Grounds

  • Alternatives

  • Remedies


12
New cards

What does CPR 54.1 identify as subject to judicial review?

  • lawfulness of an enactment to conduct relating to a public function


13
New cards

What is the source of power test?

  • examining where a body’s lethal powers originate


14
New cards

What did GCHQ 1985 establish?

  • royal prerogative powers can be subject to judicial review


15
New cards

What is the Datafin principle?

  • a body’s public functions may make it reviewable despite no statutory source


16
New cards

What happened in ex parte Datafin?

  • the takeover panel was held amenable to judicial review


17
New cards

What did ex parte Aga Khan 1993 establish?

  • regulatory power alone does not necessarily make a boy reviewable


18
New cards

Why was Aga Khan distinguishable from Datafin?

  • the jockey club’s powers were not integrated into governmental regulation


19
New cards

What is the principle in O’Reilly v Mackman 1983?

  • public law challenges should generally use judicial review procedures


20
New cards

What did ex parte Walsh 1985 establish?

  • an essentially private law dispute is not ordinarily suitable for JR


21
New cards

What is Justiciability?

  • whether an issue is suitable for determination by a court


22
New cards

What does Nottinghamshire CC illustrate?

  • judicial restraint over certain politically approved policy decisions


23
New cards

What is an ouster clause?

  • a statutory provision seeking to restrict or exclude judicial review


24
New cards

What did ex parte Gilmore 1957 establish ?

  • a statutory finality clause does not automatically exclude judicial review


25
New cards

What is the principe in Anisminic 1969?

  • an ouster clause did not protect a legally invalid determination from review


26
New cards