1/25
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
domestic homicide
killing or an individual within a domestic or familial context
intimate partner homicide
killing of an individual by their current or former intimate partner
femicide
killing of women because they are women
feminicide
state and insitution complicity in femicide
emotions of femicide perpetrators
fear, helplessness, pain, anger
fear
women as a threat
women as a threat
being at the mercy of women
pain
feeling emotionally hurt by women
anger
bodily reactions and losing control
femicide: social isolation and breaking up bonds
fights and conflict, convince, neutralisation and rationalisation
femicide: vilifying perceived external enemies
weaken places of socialisation and change dynamics
femicide: targeting the body
strategies to control the body and locking in
femicide: blocking access to labor market
keeping women out of the workplace
femicide: blocking access to healthcare
restriction to healthcare
emicide: strengthening bonds with peers
legitimation of IPV
affective economies (Di Marco)
emotions create societies and create a social order including gender, intimate relationships, and sexuality
DiMarco theoretical framework
Employing sociology of emotions perspective to understand the femicide perpetrators’ experiences help reveal the social processes underlying the violence
role of emotions in femicide (DiMarco)
emotions foster social actions that are both based on and reproduce the existing gender order
understanding intimate partner violence (Gill et al.)
requires understanding the social context, socioeconomic status, and the role of power and control
conventional view of IPV (Gill et al.)
focus on physical violence
progressive view of IPV (Gill et al.)
understanding the complexity of the issue
Gill et al. main argument
police officers views of IPV impact their responsibility to arrest and their actions
feminist perspective of IPH
gender, power, control, and patriarchy are critical to understanding IPH
evolutionary perspective of IPH
male sexual proprietariness, natural selection, male reproductive success
sociological/ criminology perspective of IPH
individual behavior is affected by individual’s characteristics, their relationships and communities
the social ecological model for violence prevention (Graham et al,)
violence prevention at the individual, relationship, cummnity and societal level