Lecture 3a - The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan
Call Kai
Learn
Practice Test
Spaced Repetition
Match
Flashcards
Knowt Play1/11
There's no tags or description
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
12 Terms
Why does Tom Regan refer to his view as radical?
What’s Tom Regans thesis?
How does Regan believe we can right the ‘fundamental wrong?’
What moral flaws did Regan point out with the argument that animals do not have rights?
Why does Regan think that utilitarianism explains why animals should have rights the best out of the other moral theories?
Explain with an example what the flaws are with the utilitarian view.
Does Regan believe that people have inherent value?
What reason does Regan argue is flawed for why we view humans as valuable?
Given Regan’s rejection of the reason why humans are valuable, what is his new idea?
How does Regan use the view of why humans are valuable to argue that animals are just as valuable?
What does Regan believe about rights for humans and non-humans?
What are the implications of Regan’s point of view?
