1/12
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
Genetic explanation
Suggests offenders commit crime because they inherit a gene, or combination of genes, that predispose them to commit crime.
Family Studies
Crowe (1972): adopted children...
Biological mother with criminal record: 50% risk for child to have criminal record by age 18
Biological mother with no criminal record: 5% risk for child to have criminal record by age 18
Twin Studies
Christiansen (1977): 3500 twin pairs in Denmark, concordance rates:
35% for MZ males
13% for DZ males
Candidate Genes
Tiihonen et al. (2015): 5-10% of all severe violent crime in Finland linked to MAOA and CDH13 genes
MAOA: regulated serotonin, low activity variant is linked to aggression
CDH13: regulated cell growth, linked to impulse control (ADHD, substance abuse)
Neural Explanation
Suggests offenders commit crime because they have dysfunctions in their brain and nervous system that predispose them to commit crime.
Seretonin
Low levels of serotonin in prefrontal cortex linked to aggression
Serotonin inhibits the firing of the amygdala to regulate emotional responses (i.e. to anger)... low serotonin = more reactive amygdala
Prefrontal Cortex
Raine et al. (2000) found 11% reduction in grey matter volume of PFC in pps with anti-social personality disorder (ASPD)
Strength #1
P- Strength = research support
E- Mednick et al. (1984): 13,000 Danish adoptees
E- No convictions in bio + adoptee parents: 13.5% convictions. Convictions in bio parents only: 20%. Convictions in bio + adoptee parents: 24.5%.
L- So, genetic inheritance plays some role, but environment is also important (diathesis-stress).
Strength #2
P- Strength = research support
E- Cases et al. (1995): studied mice with deletion of MAOA gene on X chromosome
E- MAOA deficient males showed increased aggressive behaviour
L- So, animal study evidence for MAOA deficiency and aggression
Limitation #1
P- Limitation = cause-and-effect
E- Farrington et al. (2006): childhood risk factors (e.g. physical neglect) can cause neural differences
E- Rauch et al. (2006): trauma linked to both reduced frontal lobe activity and criminality
L- So, there may be intervening variables between neural differences and offending
Limitation #2
P- Limitation = biological determinism
E- At odds with criminal justice system - suggests that crime is not an act of free will
E- Implies criminals can never be fully rehabilitated - cognitive therapy ineffective
L- So, bio explanations have serious real-world implications