1/59
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
can have same hadith with different isnads
sahih
sound and acceptable hadith
without proper isnad matn is worthless
da’if
weak hadith
shari’a
divine law that is not man-made
the revelation (Qu’ran) applied to society
revealed by God to humans
qanun
man made law
faqih
jurist (expert in law), jurisprudence (what law is and what it ought to be)
informal position of the legal scholar
expert in fiqh
fiqh
islamic law
qadi
makes the ultimate decision
islamic judge
people run away from this job
lifetime appointment
relationship between faqih and qadi
faqih provides legal understanding and qadi enforces that law
ra’y
informed opinion that has logic
doesn’t have to go back to a particular sunnah or even the Qu’ran
reasoned opinion
not making baseless arguments but need to make decisions on things because not everything is in the Qur’an and sunnah
ijtihad
need something other than ra’y and is achieved through consensus
more formal and not just opinion
theres a legal process to come to the decision
scholars agree there are certain reasons that are correct
more controlled reasoning
ijma
consensus from jurists on a certain law
relationship between ijtihad and ijma
ijtihad is the more structured legal reason and ijma is the consensus among scholars
ijma gives the stability and secures the ijtihad
madhab
school of thought
mujtahid
someone who exercises ijtihad
orthopraxy
focus more on practice and the correctness of that
5 principles of formal/classical schools
wajib/fard
sunna
ja’iz or mubah
neither obligatory or forbidden
makruh
blameworthy
haram
hanafi school
focus on ra’y
Abu Hanifa founded this
was a mawla
flexible
where did the hanafi school spread from
iraq out
maliki school
focused on hadith but more on the way of the people
founded by Malik ibn Abbas
distrust ra’y
why should we rely on human opinion when we have divine rules (like hadith and sunnah)
saw it to be biased
what was one doctrine the maliki school followed
‘amal ahl al medina
example of the people of medina
better than ra’y
should follow in the way that the Prophet and his companions in Medina acted
where did the maliki school spread
spread to egypt, north africa
shafi’i school
founded by Muhammad ibn Idris al-Shafi’i
usul-al fiqh
should use Qur’an and sunnah but also opinion too
focus on Qur’an and Sunnah first and then consensus (ijma not ra’y though)
mixes hanafi and maliki
make analogies (qiyas)
ex. if Qur’an says no wine then no beer too
maskh
when a hadith or ruling abrogated because there is a new ruling defying it
what did ahmad ibn hanbal believe in
that the Qur’an was eternal
countered al ma’mun
hanbali school
founded by Ahmad ibn hanbal
more based on hadith and following the Prophet
understands Qur’an through the sunnah
imani (twelver) shi’i school
more authority to jurists
lots of ijtihad
islam is a way of life = orthopraxy
qadarites
free will
opposed Qadr
we are the ones responsible for our actions and not God
jabarites
believed in Qadr
Murji’ites
if you claimed to be Muslim you go to Jannah
if you sinned by accident its okay
only God can judge not humans
my faith is Allah’s busines
punishment is waiting in the future on the day of judgment
what islam is today
Mu’tazilites
did mihna
Qur’an is created
strict
focused on orthodoxy when orthopraxy was becoming more popular
if you sin you are awaiting the punishment on the day of judgment
if you sin you are not a believer or a nonbeliever
Kharijites
banished those who were found guilt of committing sins
like Ali
the people who left after the arbitration
their leaders just have to be pious don’t care about lineage
repentance was seen as nothing to them
b/c if you already committed such a grave sin there is no way you could be sincere in your repentance
Ash’arites
must accept things as God does them
bi-la kayfa
don’t ask how and just accept it
God can do anything and it would be just
qadariyya/qadarites
human ability to be accountable for what they do
God has no responsibility for the wrong you do that is all you
separate evil from God
have the qudra to choose their own actions
qudra
have power to choose own actions
what did the mu’tazilites deny
that there was a separation between God and his attributes
ex. God is knowing — but “knowledge” is not a separate attribute
kasb
acquisition
Asharities
God creates an evil action like murder and we acquire it and put it into practice
God creates things but doesn’t acquire them
ex. he made my eyes blue but Allah doesn’t turn blue
God gives us the power to do things (gives ME the power to slap you)
what did the mu’tazilites think of kasb
they saw that we had the capacity to choose whether or not to slap
what do both the asharites and mutazilies do
they see the Qur’an figuratively
God’s hand = God’s power
early theological questions
if the Qu’ran is created or not
who is to blame for our actions (kasb)
is the grave sinner a muslim
predestination
kalam
method to address theological questions
use human reason (aql)
use rational arguments to defend islamic beliefs
different than ijma and ra’y
because use rational arguments to defend islamic law
who is someone that does kalam
mutakallimun
mutakallimun in ghazali thinking
defenders of orthodoxy
philosphy behind createdness of the Qur’an
God speaks and tha means he created his speech too so Qu’ran is created
what were the mu’tazilites known as
ahl al tawhid wal-adl
what is the mu’tazilities position on anthropomorphism
God can’t have a hand so when God says his hand in the Qur’an have to thinkk figuratively
al manzila bayn al manziltayn
when you sin you are neither a believer or a nonbeliever
story of the three brothers
one goes to heaven
one goes to hell
one dies young and goes somewhere in between
second guy is like why couldn’t i die early
what the story of the three brothers meant to al ashari
that God’s wisdom is beyond our logic and we just have to accept things bi la kayfa
what do the asharites believe in regards to Allah’s attributes
no separation between God and his attributes all a part of him
like mu’taziliites
what did the ashraities believe in regards to the Qur’an
it was eternal
avicenna
finds middle terms or links in the chain
influenced by aristotle
something has to bring you into existence
even if things are impossible to exist concretely they still exist mentally
i’m thinking about it so it has to exist in my mind even if not in real life
contingent
neither necessary nor impossible
what did avicenna believe about the contingent thing
it doesn’t deserve to exist but also it doesn’t deserve not to exist
Avicenna’s argument that God exists
God is a necessary being because without him nothing would exist
contingent things need a cause so that is why God exists
if there are contingent things then there needs to be someone who says it should exist and that person is God
Avicenna and wahm
wahm = inner sense
a sense that is used when things that are too abstract to be perceived by sensation
allows us to percieve things inward
ex. hostility → not a sense but can feel it through wahm)
which region was Avicenna from
Persia
Avicenna saw God as the necessary being and everything else was contingent
zakat
Muhammad SAW said to give it secretly but others have moved to give it in the open so people know that you are doing it
giving it in secret prevents pride
also give it to collectors