Political Parties, Realignment, and Polarization

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
full-widthPodcast
1
Card Sorting

1/30

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering the structure, historical development, realignment, polarization, and behavioral dynamics of political parties in the United States and comparative contexts.

31 Terms

1
New cards

Political Parties

Groups of people with similar interests who work together to create and implement policies, with the goals of winning elections, passing laws, and shaping government decisions.

2
New cards

Factions

James Madison's term in Federalist No. 10 referring to groups of citizens working together in pursuit of shared interests.

3
New cards

Big Tents

A descriptor for political parties that encompass and balance a broad range of differing viewpoints and voter coalitions to win elections.

4
New cards

Federalists

An early American political group led by Alexander Hamilton that advocated for a strong national central government.

5
New cards

Anti-Federalists

An early American political group that opposed strong centralized authority, advocating instead for state power and local control.

6
New cards

Corrupt Bargain

Andrew Jackson's term for the congressional deal that settled the presidential Election of 1824 and denied him the presidency.

7
New cards

Spoils System

The practice of rewarding loyal political party supporters with government jobs and appointments, popularized under Andrew Jackson.

8
New cards

Political Machines

Powerful local party organizations headed by party bosses that traded favors and municipal resources, such as housing or jobs, in exchange for votes.

9
New cards

Duverger’s Law

The principle formulated by French political scientist Maurice Duverger stating that single-seat plurality electoral systems structurally support only the number of parties that win plus one, resulting in a two-party system.

10
New cards

Plurality Voting

An election system in which the candidate who receives the most votes wins, making elections simple but discouraging third parties since second place receives nothing.

11
New cards

Proportional Representation

An electoral system in which legislative seats are allocated to political parties in proportion to the percentage of the total vote they receive.

12
New cards

Critical Election

A pivotal election marked by a dramatic and enduring shift in voter loyalties and coalition alignments across society.

13
New cards

Party Realignment

A long-term, lasting shift in which demographic and social groups support which political party.

14
New cards

New Deal Coalition

The broad voting coalition assembled by Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1932—consisting of African Americans, urban workers, and the poor—that underpinned Democratic electoral dominance for decades.

15
New cards

Southern Strategy

A Republican electoral strategy initiated in the 1960s by figures like Barry Goldwater and Richard Nixon that mobilized white Southern voters by playing on racial grievances following the civil rights movement.

16
New cards

Party-in-the-Electorate

The members of the general public who identify with a political party or consistently cast their ballots for that party's candidates.

17
New cards

Party Organization

The formal operational structure of a political party whose active members coordinate campaigns, recruit candidates, raise funds, and develop party branding.

18
New cards

Party-in-Government

The elected and appointed public officials who identify with a political party and organize into legislative caucuses or conferences to determine leadership and policy priorities.

19
New cards

Whips

The second-highest-ranking party leaders in the House and Senate responsible for counting votes, ensuring member attendance, and maintaining party voting discipline.

20
New cards

Divided Government

A political scenario in which the presidency and at least one chamber of Congress are controlled by different political parties.

21
New cards

Unified Government

A political scenario in which the presidency and both chambers of Congress are controlled by the same political party.

22
New cards

Party Polarization

The widening ideological distance between political parties accompanied by a decline in moderates and a rise in strict party-line voting.

23
New cards

Sorting Thesis

The explanation for polarization stating that voters have increasingly realigned their party identification to match distinct national ideological platforms rather than local issues.

24
New cards

Gerrymandering

The deliberate redrawing of legislative district boundaries to grant an unfair electoral advantage to one political party by creating safe seats.

25
New cards

Short-Term Forces

Election-specific elements, such as individual candidates or current policy issues, that influence vote choice during a specific contest.

26
New cards

Long-Term Forces

Enduring psychological and social predispositions, including party identification, socialization, and generational changes, that consistently shape political behavior.

27
New cards

Secular Realignment

A gradual, long-term shift in voter party identification along ideological lines occurring across decades as parties become more ideologically distinct.

28
New cards

Changing Sides

A dynamic identified by Carsey and Layman wherein a voter switches their party identification in response to a change in policy preference, typically occurring when the issue is personally salient and party differences are known.

29
New cards

Changing Minds

A dynamic identified by Carsey and Layman wherein a voter alters their policy preferences to conform to their existing party identification, occurring when party differences are recognized but issue salience is low.

30
New cards

Selective Exposure

The psychological tendency of individuals to seek out information sources that align with their preexisting political beliefs and avoid dissonant or opposing viewpoints.

31
New cards

Dual Losers

Voters whose favored candidate lost at the district level and whose political party lost control statewide, identified by Tolbert, Smith, and Green as the group most likely to support legislative redistricting reform.