1/16
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
What research supports NSI?
Asch’s investigation into conformity
can also support ISI when lines become harder
How did Asch study conformity?
**what did participants have to take part in
A line judgement task
What is a confederate?
A confederate is a person who appears to be a real participant but is actually working for the researcher
What is a naive participant?
A naive participant is the real participant who does not know the true aim of the study.
What method did Asch use to study conformity?(4)(not results just method)
**how many people
**how many trials
8-10 male participants were shown a standard line and three other comparison lines
However this was deception as only one was a real participant
They had to say aloud one by one which line matched the standard line (the answer was obvious) - the participant would sit last or second to last
In 12 critical trials the confederates all gave the same wrong answer before the naive participant responded
What are critical trials?
What are neutral trials?
Critical trials = the specific test rounds in Asch's study where the confederates all gave the WRONG answer on purpose
Critical trials
Key rounds where the test condition is active; where the behaviour being studied is actually measured — the rounds that count.
Neutral trials
Normal rounds with no test condition applied; used as a baseline or filler — not the main data.
RESULTS of ASCH’S RESEARCH:
What was the overall rate of conformity in critical trials?
What percentage of people conformed at least once?
What percentage of people conformed all 12 times?
33%
75%
5%
After the first laboratory experiment Asch tested the method again with different variables.
what was the variables Asch tested?
Group size - Asch varied the number of confederates from 1-15
Unanimity - one confederate gave the right answer breaking the groups unanimity by disagreeing with majority
Task difficulty - Asch made the task more ambiguous by reducing difference in line lengths
what were conformity rates with 1,2 or 3 confederates?
3% conformity rate with 1 confederate
13% with two confederates
33% with 3 confederates
After 3 confederates the % did not increase
The fact that the conformity rate didn’t increase after 3 confederates suggests what?
This suggest that only 3 wrong people are need to create group pressure
What was the overall conformity rate when one confederate gave the correct answer?+why
Conformity dropped to 5.5% due to social support
Did conformity increase or decrease by making the task more difficult?
What could this arguable be due to?
Increased to to being more uncertain
ISI
Evaluation:
How does Asch’s research support NSI?
How does task difficulty support ISI?
75% conformed at-least once even though answer was unambiguous, they didn’t want to stick out
The variation in task difficulty increased ambiguity of correct answer, participants = more uncertain so more likely to rely on judgment of others
Evaluation:
how does Asch’s task lack mundane realism/ ecological validity?
Simply asking participants to point out the correct answer on a line judgement task feels artificial and does not match real life scenarios
Also conforming happens with people we know not strangers
Evaluation:
How does Asch’s lab experiment have high internal validity?
Internal validity = whether the study tests what it says it does; results from the variable you changed, not something else
How does Asch’s method lack temporal validity?
Temporal validity = whether results hold true across different times / not just when the study was done
Carefully controlled and he used standardised procedures eg control group and experimental group
Perrin and Spencer(1981) suggest Asch’s work lacks this, that high conformity rates are due to the cultural condition in the Cold War America. Replication in British students found that there was only conformity in only 1 trial out 396
Evaluation:
What did bond find?
In meta analysis of 133 studies using Asch’s line judgement task across 17 countries, bond found that conformity rates are much higher in collectivist cultures where social norms prioritise consensus, compared to individualist societies that value independence and personal freedom