1/68
Looks like no tags are added yet.
sample distribution
a probability distribution for all values possible for an estimate
central limit theorem
sampling distribution will be less spread than the values in the population from which the sample is drawn
sampling distribution will be well modeled by a Gaussian (normal) distribution
spread of sampling distribution is related to spread of population values
bigger samples lead to smaller spread (more precision) in sampling distribution
standard error (SE)
standard deviation of the sampling distribution
measures accuracy or margin of error (how well you know the true population parameter)
standard error (SE)
= S / (n-1)1/2
confidence interval
range of values calculated from a sample that is likely to contain the true value of the population parameter
an interval around the mean
CI = mean ± Z * SE
general equation for confidence interval if distribution is normal
1.00
z value for 68% confidence interval
1.96
z value for 95% confidence interval
2.58
z value for 99% confidence interval
narrow confidence intervals
more informative, but riskier
broad confidence intervals
indicates more confidence on the estimate
error bars
illustrate standard errors or confidence intervals
figure legends must be detailed and include the type of information these are displaying
uncertainty
error bars indicate ___ about the population parameter, NOT variability in the data
probability
the ___ of an event is the proportion of times the even would occur if we repeated a random trial repeatedly multiple times under the same conditions
probability theory
the foundation for statistical reasoning
used to connect sample estimates to population parameter
inferential statistics
make predictions and generalizations about the data
estimate parameters of the population based on sample
test if results are unusual or not
inductive reasoning
uses specific observations to arrive at a general conclusion
deductive reasoning
uses general observations to predict specific results
abductive reasoning
from incomplete observations to best prediction
testable
if you cannot logically test if something is true, the hypothesis is not ____
null hypothesis
default statement and generally assumes no statistical difference
alternative hypothesis
generally, the statement the researcher “hopes” is true — assumes samples are significantly different
two-sided
type of statistical hypothesis
does not matter is value is bigger or smaller than the average, as long as it is different from the mean, the alternative hypothesis is accepted
one-sided
type of statistical hypothesis
if a value is bigger than the average or if a value is smaller than the average but not at the same time, one or the other — if one or the other the null hypothesis can be rejected
test statistic
number you get when you use data to calculate
number calculated from the data that is used to evaluate how compatible the data are with the result expected under the null hypothesis
statistical significance
decision threshold to accept that a relationship between two variables is not caused by random chance
means we have evidence that the effect that we see in the sample also exists int he population
a probability of rejection of the null hypothesis
p-value
probability of obtaining data if the null hypothesis is true, NOT the probability that the null hypothesis is true
high p-value
if probability is high
H0 is likely true and the difference is due to chance
low p-value
probability is low
H0 is likely false and there is a statistically significant difference
higher
the lower the p-value, the __ the probability of difference between samples
significance level
alpha
the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis given the null hypothesis is true
defined by how much risk we’re willing to take
less than or equal to
if P is ___ alpha then there is sufficient evidence to reject H0 and accept HA
greater than
if P is ___ alpha there is insufficient evidence to reject H0
type i error
false positive
H0 is true in reality but rejected in study
type ii error
false negative
H0 is false in reality but not rejected in study
false positive
we reach the conclusion that something is true/exists when in fact it is/does not
false negative
we reach the conclusion that something is not true/doesn’t exist or work when it is/does
type i error
the alpha
probability is the significance level
type ii error
failing to reject a false null hypothesis
a study that has low probability of this type of error is said to have high power
power
probability a random sample will lead to rejection of a false null hypothesis
increased by increasing alpha or sample size
experimental unit
a subject or group of subjects that have been assigned an experimental treatment independently of other subjects or groups
control group
way to reduce bias
treatments should include at least two groups: one with treatment of interest and __
serves as baseline to compare the effect of the treatment against procedural effects
control group
unit that does not receive the treatment of interest; all other conditions are the same between this group and the treatment groups though
randomization
way to reduce bias
subjects should be randomly assigned to treatments to reduce bias introduced by confounding variables r
random assignment
randomly sorting sample participants into control and experimental groups
ensures no systematic differences between members in each group
allows you to conclude that outcomes can attributed to explanatory variable
blinding
way to reduce bias
concealing info from participants about which experimental unit received which treatment
single-blind experiments
only subjects are unaware of treatment
removes biases introduced by subjects (unconsciously) acting or feeling different depending on knowing their treatment
double-blind experiment
neither subjects nor researchers are aware of which subject has been assigned to each treatment
removes biases introduced by experimenters (unconsciously) acting or feeling difference depending on knowing the subjects’ treatment
sample size
increasing this does not reduce bias in a study
replication
way to reduce influence of sampling error
each treatment should include multiple independent experimental units (replicates)
pseudoreplication
when measurements are NOT independent from each other, but are analyzed as if they are
temporal pseudoreplication
take several measurements on same individual over time and treat data points as independent
spatial pseudoreplication
take several measurements around same location and treat data points as independent
taking several measurements will include precision — replica value should be average of all data points in an experimental unit
balanced design
way to reduce influence of sampling error
all treatments should have same sample size to reduce error and increase power
blocking
way to reduce influence of sampling error
reduce effect of unrelated variation (confounding variables) by dividing the experimental units into groups with similar characteristic and running separate experiments
matched pair design
way to reduce influence of sampling error
mainly used for observational studies
subjects are matched based on key variables, and then one is assigned to a treatment group and the other to a control group
meant to reduce the effect of unrelated variation but only about two treatments
extreme treatments
way to reduce influence of sampling error
including these in the design helps detect treatment effect
factorial design
evaluate possible interactions between variable — an interaction between two explanatory variables means the effect of one variable on the response variable depends on the state of a second variable
observational studies
these can still follow some principles of experimental design but the challenge is reducing biases from confounding variables when you cannot control for the elements
error
this will never be completely purged
precision
used when estimating sample size
having a narrow confidence interval
requires decision about how much uncertainty we can tolerate and the likely variability in the data
assumptions: measurements in both groups are normally distributed and have the same standard deviation
power
used when estimating sample size
probability of rejecting the null hypothesis is H0 is false
assumptions: populations are normally distributed with equal standard deviation and sample size is equal in both groups
effect size
part of power
measures the intensity of the relationship between two sets of variables or groups
0.8
conventional power value for estimating sample size for high power
experimental bias
larger sample sizes decrease the magnitude of SE, improve precision of parameter estimation, reduce risks of type ii error, but do NOT minimize effects of __ __
data dredging
carrying out of many statistical tests in same set of data in hope of finding at least one statistically significant result
increases chance of type i error
bonferroni correction
one solution to data dredging
corrects for multiple comparisons
alpha* = alpha / number of tests
parametric tests
if scale is metric (=numerical) and normally distributed
uses the mean value for central tendency
generally, the more powerful than non-parametric tests
non-parametric tests
if scale is not metric(=categorical), if true distribution is unknown, or if sample is too small to assume normal distribution
uses the median value for central tendency