1/93
Looks like no tags are added yet.
learning- definition, how it’s observed, what isn’t learning, cognitive learning
A relatively permanent change in an organism’s behavior due to experience
Documented through observed behavior
Some things we call learning aren’t actually learning (walking is from maturation, not learning)
Cognitive learning: acquisition of mental info, whether by observing events, watching others, or through language
associative learning- 2 ways an organism can learn + which is associative, what is associative learning
We learn through experience and association.
can learn without experiencing
Our mind naturally connects events that occur in sequence
Linking two events that occur close together
Learning that certain events occur together. The events may be two stimuli or a response and its consequence (classical or operant)
Conditioning
Process of learning associations
Higher-order conditioning/second-order
neutral stimulus becomes associated with a previously conditioned stimulus
If tone becomes associated with food and causes salivation, a light that is associated with tone can cause CR, tends to be weaker than first-order
One-trial conditioning
single pairing of stimulus and response is enough to make association
Basic Idea, Classical vs Operant
C: Learning associations between events we do not control
O: Learning associations between our behavior and its consequences
Response, C vs O
C: Involuntary, automatic
O: Voluntary, operates on the environment
Acquisition, C vs O
C: associating events; NS becomes paired to UCS, becomes CS
O: associating a response with a consequence (reinforcer or punisher)
Extinction
C: CR decreases when CS is repeatedly presented alone
O: Responding decreases when reinforcement stops
Spontaneous Recovery, C vs O:
C: Reappearance, after a rest period, of a weakened CR
O: Reappearance, after rest period, of a weakend response
Generalization C v O
C: Tendency to respond to stimuli similar to CS
O: Responses learned in one situation occur in other, similar situations
Discrimination C v O
C: learning to distinguish between a CS and other stimuli that do not signal a UCS
O: Learning that some responses, but not others, will be reinforced
Ivan Pavlov; interest, developed, identified
Interested in respondent behavior
Developed an objective process to study psychology
Identified a form of adapting universal to organisms
Dog classical conditioning
Before conditioning, notices dog drooling before eating
Food is "unconditioned stimulus” (US) (haven’t done anything to food)
Salivation is “unconditioned response” (UNR), natural response from dog
Can he get dog to respond to neutral stimulus (NS)?
NS is whistle/bell
No conditioned response before conditioning
During conditioning (acquisition), associating triangle ring with the food
NS presented w US, dog exhibits UNR
After conditioning
Conditioned stimulus (CS) now that the dog has learned it
Whistle/triangle (CS) leads to CR (conditioned response) of salivation w/o food
UCS/US
Unconditioned stimulus
Stimulus untouched by experiment
UNR
Unconditioned response
Natural behavior, unlearned
CS
Conditioned stimulus
Stimulus when it has been learned, after association with US/UCS, trigger a CR
CR
Conditioned response
Response to conditioned stimulus, learned response to previously neutral stimulus
acquisition
Learning, acquiring association process
Extinction
Losing the conditioned response
Diminished responding that occurs when the CS no longer signals an impending UCS.
spontaneous recovery
Response comes back after time w/o it, returns at lower level than acquisition
Reappearance of a weakened CR after a pause, suggest extinction suppresses the CR but doesn’t eliminate
stimulus discrimination
Learned ability to distinguish between a conditioned stimulus that predicts the UCS and other irrelevant stimuli
Discriminative stimulus
in operant conditioning, a stimulus that elicits a response after association with reinforcement (in contrast to related stimuli not associated with reinforcement), can be used to determine animals’ abilities/concepts
John Watson
Founded
Avoid/Disdain
Study
Belief believed today
Founder of behaviorism, focused on conditioning especially in children/babies
Avoid inner thoughts, feelings, motives
Disdain for mentalistic concepts like consciousness- not believe today
Study how organisms respond to stimuli in their environment
Belief that basic laws of learning were the same for all animals- believed today
Little Albert
Wet nurse at hospital (donor milk) allows baby to experimented on
Association of loud noise and fear
If US (loud noise) prompts UNR (fear), can he use NS (rats) to cause fear response?
Were able to make CS (rats) and CR to cry, avoid, fear
Generalized from white rats to any animals or even stuffed animals
Human emotions and behaviors, though biologically influenced, are mainly a bundle of conditioned responses
taste aversion
Not liking food because of bad association
Can be classically conditioned
operant conditioning
We learn to associate a response (our behavior) and its consequences. Learn to repeat acts followed by good results, avoid acts followed by bad.
Produce operant behaviors (operate on environment to produce consequences
Doesn’t always occur separately btw operant/classical
BF Skinner
Very interested in learning to behave
Behavior that gets rewarded is likely to reoccur
Elaborated on law of effect, developed a behavioral technology that revealed principles of behavior control
Skinner box: Conditioning to associate auditory stimulus and light with no food
Accidentally push lever, now there’s food.
Thorndike’s Law of Effect
To get desired behavior, it needs to be positively reinforced right away
Principle that behaviors followed by favorable/reinforcing consequences become more likely and behaviors followed by unfavorable/punishing consequences become less likely
Tolman’s maze
1st maze, if you make it through to the end you get food immediately
Rats quickly found fastest routes
2nd maze, if you make it through after 11 days, you get food
Finishing maze at same rate as 3rd, some made it, some didn’t
On 11th day, after reinforcement, immediately started going through maze properly
3rd was control group
Shaping
Creating conditions to ‘shape’ behavior to result in a particular outcome
An operant conditioning, any even that strengthens the behavior it follows
primary reinforcer
Rewards we need, like food
An innately reinforcing stimulus, such as one that satisfies a biological need like eating or pain relief
secondary reinforcer
Rewards we want (stickers/stars)
A stimulus that gains its reinforcing power through its association with a primary reinforcer
Also called conditioned reinforcer
positive reinforcement
Introduce a reinforcing stimulus following a specific behavior. Addition of something pleasurable
negative reinforcement
Strengthen a behavior that avoids or removes a negative consequence
Taking something that’s harmful away after the right behavior is exhibited
positive punishment
Opposite of reinforcement
Adding Unpleasant stimulus
Spanking
Why no physical punishment:
Punished behavior is suppressed, not forgotten. This temporary state may negatively reinforce parents’ punishing behavior.
Physical punishment does not replace the unwanted behavior, no direction for appropriate behavior
Punishment teaches discrimination among situations. (ie, just not swearing in front of parents rather than at all)
Punishment can teach fear. Generalize to fearing the person or the environment (teacher or school, parent or home)
Physical punishment may increase aggression by modeling violence as a way to cope with problems. (modeling aggression) (could be correlation not causation)
negative punishment
Take away good thing/pleasant stimulus
cognitive map
Built of our spaces, learn things even if not reinforced, but won’t necessarily exhibit behavior unless reinforced.
latent learning
We’re constantly learning but don’t always exhibit until it atters,
insight learning
Process where learning occurs via sudden solution, not a gradual process
learned helplessness
EX: dogs conditioned via constraining to be unable to move didn’t later escape shock when they could, dogs who hadn’t walked to the other side
extrinsic motivation vs intrinsic
Because of outcome that will result by doing the task |
Because of the interest and enjoyment in the task itself |
overjustification effect
Can document a shift between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation
If someone is rewarded for something regardless of how well they do it, they reduce reason to do it well
Effort lowers
Applied Behavior Analysis
Use principles of observational learning to teach new skills, reinforce helpful behaviors discourage harmful ones
respondent behavior
Responding automatically to stimulus
Instinctive drift
the tendency of learned behavior to gradually revert to biologically predisposed patterns
operant behavior
Behavior that operates on the environment, producing a consequence
behaviorism
View that psychology should be
an objective science that
studies behavior without reference to mental processes.
Most research psychologists agree with 1, not 2.
preparedness
Biological predisposition to learn associations, such as between nausea and taste, that have survival value
reinforcement schedules
A pattern that defines how often a desired response will be reinforce
Immediate vs Delayed reinforcers
animals with delayed rewards, sometimes longer than 30s, won’t learn to associate the behavior and rewards. Humans can perceive delayed rewards, and studies have shown better delayed gratification leads to higher achievement later in life
Superstitious behavior:
developed by accidental timing of rewards during an unwanted behavior
continuous reinforcement- extinction
Reinforcing the desired response every time it occurs
Associated with rapid extinction (once the reinforcement stops, the organism quickly stop the behavior)
partial reinforcement
Reinforcing a response only part of the time; results in slower acquisition of a response but much greater resistance to extinction than does continuous reinforcement
fixed-ratio schedule
In operant conditioning, partial reinforcement/reinforcement schedule that reinforces a response only after a specified number of responses
variable-ratio schedule
In operant conditioning, a reinforcement schedule that reinforces a response after an unpredictable number of responses
fixed-interval schedule
In operant conditioning, a reinforcement schedule that reinforces a response only after a specified time has elapsed, results in scallop shaped behavior graph when behavior increases as the anticipated time approaches
variable-interval schedule
In operant conditioning, a reinforcement schedule that reinforces a response at unpredictable time intervals
*behavior is more consistent on an interval schedule
*response rates are higher on a ratio schedule
observational learning
A form of cognitive learning, lets us learn from others' experiences. EX, one animal sees another animal solve puzzle and get food, perform skill more quickly
modeling
Process of observing and imitating a specific behavior
mirror neurons
Modeling and doing fire similar neurons, observing brain is capable of learning via observation
elements of observational learning
Attention
Memory
Imitiation
At some point, observing organism must be given opportunity to imitate
Motivation
Albert Bandura
Bobo doll experiment, modeling aggression -> aggressive behaviors in children
prosocial behaviors
Positive, constructive, helpful behavior
antisocial behaviors
Negative, destructive, harmful behavior
language
Agreed-upon set of spoken/written/signed word used to communicate meaning
phoneme
Smallest distinctive sound- That-> th, a, t
morpheme
Smallest unit that carries meaning, may be a word or part of word
Readers- read, er, s
grammar
A system of language rules that enable us to communicate with and understand others.
Universal grammar
humans’ innate predisposition to understand the principles and rules that govern grammar in all languages
semantics
Grammatical rules to guide us to derive meaning from sounds
Semanticity
Use of arbitrary/nonarbitrary signals to transmit meaningful messages, with relatively fixed associations between certain signals and what they represent.
ignoring sounds that do not usually convey meaning in language
Arbitrariness
no inherent connection between a symbol and the thing it conveys
Flexibility of symbols
we’re constantly changing the connection between a symbol and thing it conveys
Naming
assigning names to things
Displacement
we can talk about the past and future, reference people doing things not in the immediate vicinity
Productivity
we generate/create sentences, we don’t repeat language
Implicit, nondeclarative, procedural
thinking in pictures
syntax
Grammatical rules guiding us in deriving meaning from ordering words into sentences
Word order, organization (like in english, subject-verb-object)
babbling stage
Beginnings of productive language, before babies speak, they sample on the sounds they can make. Around 10 months, their babbling mimics their first language. Babies of signers will sign-babble. Babies lose the ability to distinguish sounds not in their home language.
The stage in speech development, beginning around 4 months, during which an infant spontaneously utters various sounds that are not all related to the household language
one-word stage
Stage in speech development from age 1-2 ~ when a child speaks in mostly single words |
two-word stage, word learning rate, grammar + word order
The stage in speech development beginning about age 2, during which a child speaks mostly in 2-words sentences
Word explodes from word a week to a day
Overgeneralize grammar rules
Start using proper word order
telegraphic speech
The early speech stage in which a child speaks like a telegram— “go car” —using mostly nouns and verbs
aphasia
Impairment of language, usually caused by left hemisphere damage either to Broca’s area (impairing speaking) or to Wernicke’s area (impairing understanding)
Broca’s area
A frontal lobe brain area, usually in the left hemisphere
Helps control language expression by directing the muscle movements involved in speech
Wernicke’s area
A brain area, usually in the left temporal lobe, involved in language comprehension and expression
linguistic determinism
Whorf’s hypothesis that language determines the way we think
Language we’re using determines our reality
linguistic relativism
The idea that language influences the way we think, rather than determining
Doublespeak (William Lutz)
Language designed to make us think a certain way using deceptive, evasive language
Euphemism
Used to avoid a harsh or unpleasant reality
Jargon
A trade’s specialized language
Gobbledygook/bureaucratese
Overwhelm audience with long sentences, obfuscate meaning
Inflated Language
Making the ordinary seem extraordinary