1/96
UGHGHGHGHGHJ
Name | Mastery | Learn | Test | Matching | Spaced | Call with Kai | Chat |
|---|
No analytics yet
Send a link to your students to track their progress
sensitive periods
universal, easiest time to acquire certain skills
sensitive period: language acquisition
newborns can distinguish all phonemes, by year 1 they lose ability to distinguish phonemes in other languages
sensitive period: phonemes
150 phonemes at birth, no language has more than 70 phonemes
Study: bilingual speakers (Kim)
brain activation different parts due to age when 2nd language is learned
shibboleths
difficult words to pronounce if 2nd language is learned later
language deprivation examples
Wild Boy of Aveyron, Genie
Sensitive period: cultural acquisition
Immigrated before 15 years old positive correlation, immigrated 31-50 years negative correlation
Optimism bias
tendency to focus on positive aspects of self
bodily contact is desired in..
collectivistic cultures
face to face contact is desired in..
individualistic cultures
sleeping arrangements: co-sleeping
66% of 136 societies
morals principles for sleeping arrangements in the US
incest avoidance, married couple needs space, autonomy ideal
moral principles of sleeping arrangements in India
incest avoidance, protection of vulnerable, female chastity anxiety, respect for hierarchy
secure attachment (announces when they leave)
confident, explores, seeks mothers presence when she returns
avoidance attachment (leaves w/o notice)
little distress when mom leaves and avoids her on return
anxious-ambivalent attachment (comes and go as they please, multiple adults)
frequent distress when mother is present or absent
what attachment style does the US prefer
secure attachment; focus on independence
what attachment style does Germany prefer
avoidant attachment; early independence
what attachment style does Israel Kibbutz prefer
anxious-ambivalent attachment; independence from parents
what attachment style isn’t found in some cultures?
avoidant attachment (Japan and Dogon in West Africa)
Parenting styles dimensions: Demandingness
clear rules, monitors behaviors, parent-child dialogue
Parenting styles dimensions: Responsiveness
conveys affection, caring, emotional warmth
parenting style research limitations
western based, may not capture parenting styles in other cultures
Terrible twos
development milestone in west, resistance and oppositional behavior, important for autonomy and individuality, NOT universal
Adolescent rebellion
development milestone in west, risk-taking and delinquency, hormonal changes, not universal
communicate about objects in western cultures
objects described as separate from their environment
communicate about objects in non-western cultures
describe how objects are related to environment
how does formal education affect categorization
group by similar attributes
how does formal education affect cognitive processes
focus on abstract thinking and knowledge beyond direct experience, ability to create taxonomic categories
math performance study Stevenson Stinger
Asia had greater mean, US had bigger range, best US scores = worst Asia scores
Teaching Methods: US vs Asia
Asia has more days in a school year, uses more real world math, greater class time learning math, more math homework
parents expectations: US vs Asia
Asia views education as more important, Taiwan has more study desks in the home, US is more satisfied with child’s performance, Asia has higher achievement standards
Acculturation
attitudes and beliefs of host culture
enculturation
attitudes and beliefs of heritage culture
integration (pos/pos)
most successful, less prejudice, more social support (adopts acculturation and enculturation)
marginalization (neg/neg)
rare, less successful (rejects acculturation and enculturation)
separation (neg/pos)
rejects acculturation, adopts enculturation
assimilation (pos/neg)
adopts acculturation, rejects enculturation
Independent selves
separate from relationships, self concept is contained, identity stable and consistent, ingroup/outgroup is fluid and permeable
interdependent selves
overlaps with relationships, self concept defined by relationships, identity flexible/fluid, ingroup/outgroup is stable and impermeable
interdependent self and relationships
strong distinction between in vs out group, harder to form/maintain new relations, more distress when relationships end, high obligation to ingroup
independent self and relationships
weak distinction between in vs out group, easier to form/dissolve new relations, less distress when ends, low obligation to ingroup
Hofstede: Individualism/collectivism
80% of world is collectivistic
Highly individualistic countries
US, English speaking countries, western Europe
highly collectivistic countries
Latin American, Asia, Africa, Eastern/Southern Europe, South Pacific
highest collectivistic states in US
Hawaii, Utah, Confederate South
lowest collectivistic states in US
Mountain West, Great Plains, Northeast, Midwest
Higher social economic status
Iceland: higher individualism, US: higher independence, JPN: higher interdependence
high support of gender equality
Netherlands, Finland, Germany
low support of gender equality
India, Pakistan, Nigeria
higher gender equality
more Christians, countries north of equator, high individualism, higher urbanization
Cognitive Dissonance
mental discomfort from inconsistency between attitudes and behaviors
Rationalizing; emphasizing
Pos of selected choice and neg of rejecting alternative
Rationalizing; downplaying
neg of selected choice and pos of rejecting alternative
increased self consistency in the us predicts
higher well being and better social skills
self awareness
subjective (independent) and objective (interdependent)
subjective awareness
taking perspective of subject (focused out), less concern with others view
objective awareness
experiencing self as object (focused in), more concern with others view
generosity level
Individualistic; predicted > actual, collectivistic; predicted = actual
incremental theory
abilities malleable, focus on more effort and new strategies, interdependent selves
entity theory
abilities fixed, focus on lower effort and innate lack of ability, independent selves
Five Factor Model (The Big Five)
80% of personality; Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism
Limits to Big Five
used English personality terms, WEIRD samples, other cultures yielded extra factors
Chinese personality scale
Dependability, Social Potency, Individualism, Interpersonal relatedness
Big Five factors: gender
women more open to feelings, men more open to ideas, men more C & E, women more A & N
Attraction: appealing faces
clear complexion, bilateral symmetry, average features, regular teeth
preference for mate: desirable
kindness, understanding, intelligence, exciting, healthy
preference for mate: indispensable
love, emotionally stable, dependable, good health, pleasing disposition
what do men prefer in potential mates?
younger, appearance, chastity
what do women prefer in potential mates?
finances, ambition, industrious, order
attractiveness: bodies
thin bodies idealized in western cultures, West Africa idealizes fatness
Propinquity effect
universal, more likely to be attracted to those we frequently meet
Mere exposure effect
more we exposed to stimulus, more we become attracted to it
similarity-attraction effect
more attracted to those like ourselves, not universal
4 basic elements of sociality
communal sharing, authority ranking, equality matching, market pricing
communal sharing
family-like, emphasizes common identity, everyone treated equally, resources pooled
authority ranking
military-like, ordered in linear, hierarchal, social dimension
equality matching
carpools, based on reciprocity and balance, ongoing, take turns, more non-western
market pricing
exchanges in marketplace, based in proportionality and ratios, benefits exchanged, occur at once, more in individualistic cultures
high relational mobility
flexible ties, opportunities for new relationships, few prior family and group opportunities, more western
low relational mobility
rigid tied, less opportunities for new relationships, many prior family and group opportunities, bound by commitments to others, non-western
Halo effect
the more physically attractive someone is the more positive or desirable they are considered
frequency of enemies
US 26%, Ghana 71%
higher RM cultures have less enemies
greater choice to pick ingroup, enemies can be avoided
lower RM cultures have more enemies
less choice to pick ingroup, enemies in ingroup
simpatico
maintain harmony and making expressive displays of graciousness, hospitality and congeniality
romantic love evolutionary theory
ensures children have resources and protection
romance is found in..
89% of cultures
Intimacy
emotional closeness, some non-western cultures have intimacy needs met by social networks, confiding in romantic partner essential in western cultures
passion
universal but not equally strong everywhere, kissing in western and Asian cultures, stronger passion partially emerges from high RM
commitment
stronger in East Asia or highly enculturated Asian Canadians, idealization more common in Canadians than japanese
divorce rates
correlated with individualism and higher RM
arranged marriages
more non-western, stronger in extended family cultures, marriage seen as intersection of 2 families not 2 individuals
research: love marriages
more individualistic cultures, higher idealization of romantic partners, stronger in nuclear family cultures
research: arranged marriages
successful, love develops over time
Japanese and Chinese men find more martial satisfaction in…
arranged marriages
Japanese and Chinese women find more martial satisfaction in…
love marriages