6. ethical issues and dealing with them

0.0(0)
Studied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/10

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

11 Terms

1
New cards

what are ethical issues

they arise when a conflict exists between the rights of participants in research studies and the goals of research to produce authentic, valid and worthwhile data

2
New cards

what is the BPS code of ethics

  • a quasi-legal document produced by the BPS that instructs psychologists in the UK about what behaviour is and is not acceptable when dealing with participants

  • the code is built around four major principles: respect, competence, responsibility and integrity

  • guidelines are implemented by ethics committees who use a cost benefit approach to determine whether particular proposals are ethically acceptable


3
New cards

four major ethical issues

  1. informed consent

  2. deception

  3. protection from harm

  4. privacy and confidentiality


4
New cards

informed consent

  • involves making the participants aware of the aims of the research, the procedures, their rights (incl right to withdraw) and what their data will be used for

  • participants should then make an informed judgement without being coerced or feeling obliged

  • researchers POV it may make the study meaningless as their behaviour will not be natural as they are aware of the aims


5
New cards

dealing with informed consent

  • participants should be issued with a consent letter/form detailing all relevant information that may affect their decision to participate which is then signed if they agree



6
New cards

types of consent

  • presumptive - a similar group of people are asked if the study is acceptable and if they agree then the consent of the original participants is ‘presumed’

  • prior general - participants give their permission to take part in a number of different studies incl the one that will involve deception. by consenting, they are effectively consenting to being deceived

  • retrospective - asked for consent during debrief


7
New cards

deception

  • means deliberately misleading or withholding information from participants at any stage of the investigation

  • if decieved, then they have not provided informed consent

  • can be justified if it does not cause the participant undue distress


8
New cards

protection from harm

  • participants should not be placed at any more risk than they would be in their daily lives, and should be protected from physical and psychological harm - latter includes being made to feel embarrased, inadequate or being placed under undue stress or pressure

  • important feature is being reminded of the right to withdraw


9
New cards

dealing with deception and protection from harm

  • should be given a full debrief - made aware of true aims and additional details that were not supplied

  • should be told the use of their data and the right to withdraw it if they wish (particularly important with retrospective consent)

  • researcher should provide counselling if the participants have been subject to stress or embarrassment


10
New cards

privacy and confidentiality

  • right to privacy - to control information about themselves

  • if this is invaded then confidentiality should be protected - refers to our right, enshrined in law under the data protection act, to have any personal data protected

  • right to privacy extends to the area where the study took place such that institutions or geographical locations are not named


11
New cards

dealing with confidentiality

  • maintain anonymity - referring to participants using numbers or initials when writing up the investigation, for case studies often initials are used eg HM

  • participants are reminded data will be protected and not shared with other researchers