AI PDF Summarizer | Built for Students | Works for Long PDFs | Knowt

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/25

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

26 Terms

1
New cards

Classical Era (Criminology)

A criminological perspective rooted in the belief that individuals possess free will, act rationally by weighing costs and benefits, and choose crime based on hedonistic calculations.

2
New cards

Hedonism

The philosophical assumption that human decision-making is naturally governed by the desire to maximize pleasure and avoid or minimize pain.

3
New cards

Social contract

The reciprocal arrangement in which individuals surrender a portion of their personal freedoms to the state in exchange for collective protection, safety, and social order.

4
New cards

Deterrence Theory (Beccaria)

The principle that criminal behavior is prevented when legal punishments are perceived as certain, swift, and severe enough to outweigh the illicit rewards.

5
New cards

Specific Deterrence vs. General Deterrence

Specific deterrence seeks to stop the punished individual from reoffending, whereas general deterrence seeks to discourage the broader public by example.

6
New cards

Principle of Utility (Utilitarianism)

Bentham's ethical principle holding that actions, laws, and sanctions must aim to produce the greatest net happiness or pleasure for the greatest number of people

7
New cards

Positivist Era (Criminology)

A school of thought asserting that human behavior is shaped by forces outside individual control—using empirical scientific methods to identify biological, psychological, and social causes.

8
New cards

Determinism

The criminological premise that behavior is caused by internal or external factors beyond a person's complete voluntary control, contrasting directly with classical free will.

9
New cards

Conflict View of Law and Crime (Marx)

The perspective that legal statutes are crafted to maintain the economic dominance of the ruling class, while unlawful acts highlight underlying class inequality and systemic oppression.

10
New cards

Functions of Crime (Durkheim)

A sociological perspective stating that deviance is normal and unavoidable, serving to clarify social boundaries, reinforce shared norms through punishment, and stimulate adaptive social change.

11
New cards

Anomie (Durkheim)

A state of societal normlessness or deregulation occurring during rapid economic or structural change, leaving individuals disconnected and without clear social guidance.

12
New cards

Atavism (Lombroso)

The early positivist biological hypothesis that offenders are evolutionary throwbacks recognizable by distinct physical characteristics called atavistic stigmata.

13
New cards

Modern Biosocial Research

An evidence-based approach examining how biological vulnerabilities (such as genetics, hormones, and neurology) interact dynamically with social and physical environments, rejecting pure biological determinism.

14
New cards

Parens Patriae

The legal doctrine meaning 'parent of the country,' authorizing the state to act in loco parentis to protect, supervise, and rehabilitate vulnerable or delinquent minors.

15
New cards

Strain Theory (Merton)

A structural theory arguing that criminal conduct arises when individuals face a disconnect between culturally mandated success goals and unequal access to legitimate opportunities.

16
New cards

Durkheim's Anomie vs. Merton's Anomie

Durkheim defined anomie as a breakdown of societal norms, whereas Merton defined it as a cultural imbalance emphasizing monetary success without equal access to institutional means.

17
New cards

Innovation (Merton's Strain Adaptations)

The adaptation most commonly tied to traditional street and economic offenses, characterized by accepting societal goals while rejecting institutionalized, legitimate means.

18
New cards

Zone of Transition (Zone 2)

The area in Burgess and Park's concentric model adjacent to the Central Business District, experiencing the greatest rates of physical deterioration, population turnover, poverty, and social disorganization.

19
New cards

social Disorganization Theory (Shaw & McKay)

The theory proposing that elevated crime rates stem from community-level structural decay—specifically poverty, high residential mobility, and ethnic heterogeneity—rather than individual pathology.

20
New cards

Cultural Transmission of Crime

The mechanism by which delinquent traditions, rationalizations, and criminal techniques are passed down across generations within socially disorganized neighborhoods.

21
New cards

Differential Association Theory (Sutherland)

A social learning perspective stating that lawbreaking is acquired through communication in intimate groups, occurring when definitions favorable to violating the law exceed definitions unfavorable to it.

22
New cards

Labeling Theory (Becker)

A perspective stating that deviance is not an inherent quality of an act, but rather a product of societal definitions and selective rule enforcement against individuals

23
New cards

Secret Deviant vs. Falsely Accused (Becker)

A secret deviant violates rules without receiving public sanction, whereas a falsely accused person observes social rules but is nonetheless perceived and treated as deviant.

24
New cards

Primary Deviance vs. Secondary Deviance (Lemert)

Primary deviance consists of initial rule infractions that remain peripheral to self-image; secondary deviance emerges when a person adopts and internalizes the deviant label into their core identity.

25
New cards

Etiological vs. Epidemiological Explanations

Etiological models investigate the causal origins behind why individuals commit infractions, whereas epidemiological models analyze aggregate geographic and demographic crime distribution patterns.

26
New cards

Consensus vs. Conflict Models

Consensus frameworks assume society is held together by widely shared values reflected in law, whereas conflict frameworks view law as an instrument wielded by dominant groups against subordinate populations.