1/20
Looks like no tags are added yet.
accommodation
changing existing schema to fit new info
assimilation
taking in new information and fitting into existing schema
between-subjects design
randomly selected
between-subjects benefits
quick, low attrition rate
between-subjects negatives
large no. of participants, hard to ensure individual differences balanced
mixed design
combines elements of within and between subjects designs
mixed design negatives
costly, time consuming, higher attrition chance
mixed design benefits
allows comparison of results across conditions + individuals
within-subjects design
when participants are exposed to both experimental and control conditions
within-subjects benefits
less individual differences
within-subjects negatives
repeated tasks - participant grows bored or tired, meaning increased attrition, prior knowledge affects later test
convenience sampling
participants selected based on how easy they are to access/how close to researcher
random sampling
every member of population has equal chance of being selected
stratified sampling
population divided into groups/strata based on characteristics, then participants selected randomly or systematically from each group
erikson’s theory stages
trust vs mistrust (0-12/18 months)
autonomy vs shame/doubt (12/18 months - 3 yrs)
initiative vs guilt (3-5)
industry vs inferiority (5-12)
identity vs confusion (12-18)
intimacy vs isolation (19-29)
generativity vs stagnation (30-64)
integrity vs despair (65+)
ethical guidelines
Very Intelligent Ducks Can Do Well
Voluntary Participation
Informed consent procedures
Debriefing
Confidentiality
Deception
Withdraw rights
research hypothesis
IPID-C
Independent and dependent variable
Population
“it was hypothesised that…”
Direction of effect (IV increased or decreases DV)
Control group
sensitive period
when the brain is more responsive to certain environmental experience or learning
critical period
when something is most vulnerable to deprivation or absence of certain stimuli or experiences
extraneous variable
variable that is not the IV that MIGHT have an effect on the result
confounding variable
variable that is not the IV that HAS had an effect on the result