Criminology: Mass Incarceration, Labeling Theory, Deterrence, and Policing

0.0(0)
Studied by 1 person
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/95

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Comprehensive review flashcards covering mass incarceration, labeling theory, deterrence theory, capital punishment, probation, parole, and policing based on class lectures and assigned readings.

96 Terms

1
New cards

What are the three primary reasons discussed for why mass incarceration did not effectively reduce crime?

  1. Incarceration is not an effective deterrent; 2. Incarceration is overused; 3. Incarceration is "criminogenic."


2
New cards

What does it mean to say that incarceration is "criminogenic"?

It means that the experience of incarceration itself produces, fosters, or leads to more criminal behavior.

3
New cards

How does differential association theory explain why incarceration can lead to more crime?

Through the school-of-crime hypothesis, where individuals learn criminal behaviors, values, and techniques from associating with other incarcerated offenders.

4
New cards

How does control theory explain why incarceration is criminogenic?

Through the weakening of social bonds hypothesis, specifically by severing or undermining prosocial bonds to marriage, work, and voting.

5
New cards

According to labeling theory, how does stigma contribute to increased crime?

Crime results from the audience's reaction to behavior rather than the behavior itself; the negative stigma and labels applied by institutions define self-image and sustain criminal behavior.

6
New cards

How is household wealth defined in the context of American social stratification?

Wealth=total assets (e.g., housing, savings, stocks, retirement plans, income)−total liabilities (debts, loans)\text{Wealth} = \text{total assets (e.g., housing, savings, stocks, retirement plans, income)} - \text{total liabilities (debts, loans)}

7
New cards

What are the six sequential stages of the Labeling Process?

  1. The Initial "Criminal" Act; 2. Detection by the System; 3. Application of The Label; 4. Creation of a New Identity; 5. Acceptance of The Label; 6. Amplification.


8
New cards

What occurs during Stage 1 (The Initial Criminal Act) of the Labeling Process?

Individuals do not define themselves as "criminals" and desire to avoid that status; their initial behavior often has few consequences because it goes unnoticed or is forgotten.

9
New cards

What occurs during Stage 2 (Detection by the System) of the Labeling Process?

Rules and laws are differentially enforced based on individuals' social and economic power, subjecting certain populations to greater supervision and social control.

10
New cards

What concept did Howard Becker (1969) introduce regarding the creation of criminal rules and laws?

The concept of "moral entrepreneurs," defined as people who use their power and influence to lead crusades against perceived "immoral acts."

11
New cards

What historical moral panic in the mid-to-late 1980s1980\text{s} served as a primary example of policy change driven by moral entrepreneurs?

The moral panic surrounding crack cocaine, in which policymakers believed crack was 100100 times worse than powder cocaine.

12
New cards

What is the only pharmacological difference between crack cocaine and powder cocaine?

Crack cocaine is prepared by mixing powder cocaine with baking soda and water.

13
New cards

Under the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, how much powder cocaine was required to trigger a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years5\text{ years}?

500 grams500\text{ grams}

14
New cards

Under the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, how much crack cocaine was required to trigger a mandatory minimum sentence of 5 years5\text{ years}?

5 grams5\text{ grams}

15
New cards

What was the sentencing disparity ratio between crack cocaine and powder cocaine established by the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986?

A 100 to 1100\text{ to }1 disparity.

16
New cards

Under the Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986, what quantities of LSD, marijuana, and heroin triggered a 5-year5\text{-year} mandatory minimum sentence?

LSD: 1 gram1\text{ gram}; Marijuana: 100 plants100\text{ plants}; Heroin: 100 grams100\text{ grams}.

17
New cards

How did the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 alter the crack-to-powder cocaine sentencing disparity?

It raised the crack cocaine threshold for a 5-year5\text{-year} mandatory minimum to 28 grams28\text{ grams} while keeping powder cocaine at 500 grams500\text{ grams}, reducing the disparity to 18 to 118\text{ to }1.

18
New cards

What was the significance of the First Step Act of 2019 regarding cocaine sentencing?

It applied the provisions of the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010 retroactively and reduced sentences for other drug offenses.

19
New cards

Where and how does Stage 3 (Application of the Label) typically occur?

It occurs in ritualized settings such as a courtroom or public hearing, where society permanently affixes a criminal label, converting conventional citizens into "criminals."

20
New cards

According to Shannon et al. (2017), approximately how many individuals in the United States hold felony-level criminal records?

About 19 million19\text{ million} individuals.

21
New cards

What occurs during Stage 4 (Creation of a New Identity) of the Labeling Process?

The label becomes part of the person's permanent record and the community's perception, transforming the individual into an "outsider" looking in on conventional society.

22
New cards

What five major collateral losses or restrictions can result directly from a felony conviction?

Loss of employment, denial of university admission/funding, loss of professional licenses, loss of child custody, and denial of public housing.

23
New cards

According to the audit study by Agan and Starr (2017), how much did a low-level felony record reduce employer callback rates?

It reduced employer callback rates by 40%40\%.

24
New cards

What percentage of four-year colleges require applicants to disclose their criminal history?

72%72\%

25
New cards

What restriction does the FAFSA form impose on applicants with criminal convictions?

It states that students convicted of the possession or sale of illegal drugs while enrolled have limited eligibility for federal student aid.

26
New cards

In Stewart and Uggen's (2019) study on college admissions, what were the acceptance rates for applicants without versus with a felony record?

No felony record: 90%90\%; With a felony record: 74.6%74.6\%.

27
New cards

What occurs during Stage 5 (Acceptance of the Label) of the Labeling Process?

Societal treatment of the individual as a criminal increases the likelihood that they internalize the label into their self-concept; attempts to resist the label are interpreted as signs of deviance.

28
New cards

What occurs during Stage 6 (Amplification) of the Labeling Process?

The individual associates primarily with other labeled individuals, reinforcing a criminal trajectory that is difficult to change.

29
New cards

What data source was used for the quantitative longitudinal test of labeling theory discussed in the lecture?

The National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988 (NELS:88).

30
New cards

What was the sample design and follow-up timeline for the NELS:88 study?

A nationally representative sample of eighth-graders across over 1,0001{,}000 schools surveyed in 19881988, followed up in the 12th12\text{th} grade in 19921992.

31
New cards

What were the fighting prevalence rates in the 12th12\text{th} grade for students labeled as "troublemakers" versus non-troublemakers in the 8th8\text{th} grade?

Troublemakers: 89402=0.22\frac{89}{402} = 0.22 (22%22\%); Non-troublemakers: 8569,334=0.09\frac{856}{9{,}334} = 0.09 (9%9\%).

32
New cards

In the 12th12\text{th} grade follow-up of NELS:88, how many students were arrested among those labeled "not a troublemaker" versus "troublemaker" in the 8th8\text{th} grade?

Not a troublemaker: 252252 arrested (9,0829{,}082 not arrested); Troublemaker: 3131 arrested (371371 not arrested).

33
New cards

What are the four criminal justice policy changes proposed to explain the post-1990s crime decline?

  1. Increase in incarceration; 2. Increase in probation/parole; 3. Use of the death penalty; 4. Increase in the number of police officers.
34
New cards

What are the five economic, social, and environmental changes proposed to explain the crime decline?

  1. Fewer teenagers; 2. Removal of lead from gasoline and paint; 3. Legalization of abortion; 4. Higher educational attainment and more jobs; 5. Decline in substance use.
35
New cards

How does the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS, 2026) define probation?

A court-ordered period of correctional supervision in the community, generally serving as an alternative to incarceration.

36
New cards

How does the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS, 2026) define parole?

A period of conditional supervised release in the community following the completion of a prison term.

37
New cards

What unique feature distinguishes the United States prosecution system from all other countries?

The United States is the only country in the world that elects its prosecutors.

38
New cards

What percentage of incumbent District Attorneys in the United States run for re-election unopposed?

80%80\%

39
New cards

What key discretionary powers are held exclusively by the District Attorney?

Picking the criminal charges, making bail demands, negotiating plea bargains, and exercising absolute immunity from lawsuits.

40
New cards

According to the Annual Review of Criminology (2020), what was the successful completion rate for adult probationers whose cases closed in 20162016?

50%50\% were reported as successful completions.

41
New cards

According to inmate surveys, what percentage of jail inmates and state/federal prisoners were on probation at the time of their arrest?

Jail inmates: 33%33\%; State and federal inmates: 23%23\%.

42
New cards

What types of financial sanctions are commonly attached to probation supervision (Harvard Law School, 2020)?

Supervision fees, mandatory class or program fees, and drug or alcohol testing fees.

43
New cards

What negative consequences can occur when a probationer fails to pay their court-ordered financial sanctions?

Additional reporting requirements, electronic monitoring, incarceration, extension of the probation term, and disenfranchisement.

44
New cards

How do probation officers and judges divide authority during a probation revocation process?

Probation officers have discretion to file for a revocation hearing, but the formal decision to incarcerate or impose other sanctions rests solely with the judge.

45
New cards

Why do scholars argue that mass probation acts as a "delayed path to prison" rather than an alternative sanction?

Because high failure rates and technical violations frequently result in probationers ultimately being incarcerated.

46
New cards

What are two key demographic and sentence characteristics of adults on parole in the United States (2026 data)?

88%88\% are male, and 90%90\% had been incarcerated for more than 1 year1\text{ year}.

47
New cards

In the course readings, which individuals are highlighted in 'Second Chance Club' regarding probation or parole?

Kendrick, Javaron, Ronald, Sheila, Hard Head, and Damien.

48
New cards

In Emily Bazelon's book 'Charged', which two defendants are central to the narrative?

Kevin and Noura.

49
New cards

How does the Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS, 2020) define capital punishment?

"The process of sentencing convicted offenders to death for the most serious crimes and carrying out that sentence."

50
New cards

How is Deterrence Theory fundamentally defined in criminology?

A rational choice theory in which prospective offenders balance the anticipated costs and benefits of committing a crime.

51
New cards

What is the operational goal of specific (individual) deterrence?

To apply just enough sanction cost to an individual offender to offset any benefits gained from committing the offense.

52
New cards

What is the operational mechanism of general (societal) deterrence?

Members of the general public observe that a punished offender does not gain from criminal behavior and are thereby discouraged from committing crimes.

53
New cards

What are the three essential components required for effective legal deterrence?

Swiftness (celerity), certainty, and severity.

54
New cards

What does the 'swiftness' (celerity) component of deterrence theory require?

The punishment must be administered close in time to the commission of the criminal act.

55
New cards

What does the 'certainty' component of deterrence theory require?

The criminal behavior must be consistently detected and punished.

56
New cards

What does the 'severity' component of deterrence theory require?

The magnitude of the punishment must be proportionate to the seriousness of the crime while sufficient to outweigh the benefits.

57
New cards

How is homicide defined in criminal legal contexts?

The killing of one human being by another human being.

58
New cards

What forms of killing are legally distinguished from criminal homicides?

Killings committed in legitimate self-defense and lawful state executions.

59
New cards

What is the statistical likelihood of an offender receiving the death penalty across all homicides committed in the United States?

1 in 1,0001\text{ in }1{,}000 homicides.

60
New cards

What is the statistical likelihood of an offender receiving the death penalty among capital-eligible homicides?

1 in 101\text{ in }10 capital-eligible homicides.

61
New cards

What statutory criteria make a homicide eligible for the death penalty?

The homicide must be intentional, committed with premeditation, and accompanied by aggravating circumstances (such as killing a police officer, murder for hire, or multiple murders).

62
New cards

According to the National Academy of Sciences (2012) cohort study (1973 to 20091973\text{ to }2009), what percentage of death-sentenced inmates were actually executed?

15%15\%

63
New cards

According to the NAS (2012) data (1973 to 20091973\text{ to }2009), what percentage of capital convictions resulted in reversals, commutations, or the inmate dying on death row?

46%46\%

64
New cards

According to the NAS (2012) review (1973 to 20091973\text{ to }2009), what percentage of death row inmates remained on death row at the conclusion of the study?

39%39\%

65
New cards

How many total death sentences were handed down and how many total executions took place in the US between 19731973 and 20092009?

8,1158{,}115 death sentences and 1,1881{,}188 executions.

66
New cards

How many states maintained an active death penalty statute at some point between 19731973 and 20092009?

40 states40\text{ states}

67
New cards

In Texas between 19731973 and 20092009, how many death sentences and executions occurred, and what was the execution rate?

1,0401{,}040 death sentences and 447447 executions, representing a 43%43\% execution rate per death sentence.

68
New cards

In Virginia between 19731973 and 20092009, how many death sentences and executions occurred, and what was the execution rate?

150150 death sentences and 105105 executions, representing a 70%70\% execution rate per death sentence.

69
New cards

In Florida between 19731973 and 20092009, how many death sentences and executions occurred, and what was the execution rate?

977977 death sentences and 6868 executions, representing a 7%7\% execution rate per death sentence.

70
New cards

In California between 19731973 and 20092009, how many death sentences and executions occurred, and what was the execution rate?

927927 death sentences and 1313 executions, representing a 1.4%1.4\% execution rate per death sentence.

71
New cards

In Pennsylvania between 19731973 and 20092009, how many death sentences and executions occurred?

399399 death sentences and 33 executions (<1%< 1\% execution rate).

72
New cards

In New York between 19731973 and 20092009, how many death sentences and executions occurred?

1010 death sentences and 00 executions (0%0\% execution rate).

73
New cards

From 1990 to 19991990\text{ to }1999, what were California's totals for homicides, death sentences, and executions?

28,78128{,}781 homicides, 334334 death sentences (1%1\% of homicides), and 77 executions (0.02%0.02\% of homicides).

74
New cards

From 1990 to 19991990\text{ to }1999, what were Texas's totals for homicides, death sentences, and executions?

16,12016{,}120 homicides, 343343 death sentences (2%2\% of homicides), and 162162 executions (1%1\% of homicides).

75
New cards

What did Sorenson's empirical study on Texas executions between 19841984 and 19971997 conclude regarding deterrence?

There was no deterrent effect; the number of executions was unrelated to subsequent murder rates.

76
New cards

What did William Bailey's empirical study discover after Oklahoma resumed executions following a 25-year25\text{-year} moratorium?

He found no deterrence, but instead observed a statistically significant increase in stranger killings and non-felony stranger killings.

77
New cards

What was the definitive conclusion of the National Academy of Sciences (2012) report regarding the death penalty's deterrent effect?

There is no credible scientific evidence or proof that the death penalty deters crime.

78
New cards

How did the average elapsed time between death sentencing and execution change from 19881988 to 20182018 and 20232023?

1988: 7 years1988\text{: } 7\text{ years}; 2018: 20 years2018\text{: } 20\text{ years}; 2023: 23.25 years2023\text{: } 23.25\text{ years}.

79
New cards

What cultural and media dynamics fueled the call for increased policing during the 1990s1990\text{s}?

Intense fear of violent crime, the media-driven myth of juvenile "superpredators," political pressure, the crack epidemic, and "get tough" rhetoric.

80
New cards

How much total funding was authorized by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (the 1994 Crime Bill)?

$30 billion\$30\text{ billion} to fund state and local incarceration, prison construction, and law enforcement hiring.

81
New cards

How many new local police officers were funded by the 1994 Crime Bill?

100,000100{,}000 new local police officers.

82
New cards

What federal agency was created by the 1994 Crime Bill, and how much grant funding has it since awarded?

The Office of Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS), which has provided approximately $14 billion\$14\text{ billion} in funding for localities.

83
New cards

What did Steven Levitt's (2002) study of 122 cities122\text{ cities} (1975 to 19951975\text{ to }1995) find regarding police staffing and crime?

Increased police staffing reduced violent crime by 12%12\% and property crime by 8%8\%.

84
New cards

What did Corman and Mocan (2000) find concerning the effect of increased police numbers on specific crime categories?

Increased police presence reduced robberies and burglaries, but had no significant deterrent effect on murders or auto thefts.

85
New cards

What did Kovandzic and Sloan (2002) find regarding the impact of police force size on crime rates?

Larger police forces led to fewer robberies, burglaries, and larcenies, but produced no measurable effect on assaults or murders.

86
New cards

What were the empirical findings of Roeder, Eisen, and Bowling (2015) regarding police numbers and crime decline?

Increased police officer staffing numbers had no measurable effect on violent crime or property crime.

87
New cards

According to Mello's (2019) evaluation of federal COPS hiring grants, how many crimes were prevented per additional hired police officer?

Each additional officer prevented approximately 44 violent crimes and 1515 property crimes.

88
New cards

What methodological challenge creates potential bias when studying the relationship between police force size and crime rates?

Simultaneity / reverse causality: increases in crime rates induce cities to hire more officers, while officer hiring is simultaneously intended to reduce crime.

89
New cards

What experimental design did Sherman and Weisburd (1995) implement in Minneapolis to evaluate patrol presence?

A one-year randomized controlled trial doubling patrol presence dosage across 5555 out of 110110 identified crime hot spots, evaluated via 7,542 hours7{,}542\text{ hours} of observation.

90
New cards

What reduction in crime calls did Sherman and Weisburd (1995) observe in high-dosage patrol hot spots?

Reductions in total crime calls ranging from 6%6\% to 13%13\%.

91
New cards

According to Sutton and Dahir (2025), how many states have passed policing reform legislation since 20202020?

45 states45\text{ states} enacted reform-oriented policing statutes, with 31 states31\text{ states} enacting specific statutes addressing police use of force.

92
New cards

How did annual state and local government spending on policing change between 19601960, 19801980, and 20182018?

1960: $2 billion1960\text{: } \$2\text{ billion}; 1980: $15 billion1980\text{: } \$15\text{ billion}; 2018: $137 billion2018\text{: } \$137\text{ billion}.

93
New cards

According to former police chief Charles H. Ramsey, why has the scope of modern police work expanded significantly?

Police departments have increasingly been used to "fill the gaps where city services are not adequate."

94
New cards

What four non-traditional social response responsibilities have modern police departments increasingly assumed?

  1. Managing domestic violence; 2. Handling substance use; 3. Responding to homeless populations; 4. Serving as security to keep students safe in schools.


95
New cards

What is the null hypothesis in a two-proportion z-test comparing subsequent delinquency rates between labeled and non-labeled youth?

The proportions of fighters (or arrested individuals) in the two groups are the same (p1=p2p_1 = p_2).

96
New cards

According to labeling theorists, whose labels carry the greatest weight and are most likely to stick to an individual?

Labels applied by powerful authority figures, such as parents, teachers, employers, and the police.