Negotiation Test Study

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/175

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 5:23 AM on 10/15/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

176 Terms

1
New cards
What does BATNA stand for; and what does it mean?
Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement: the best available action you can take if this deal fails.
2
New cards
Is a BATNA a number or an action?
An action; such as buying elsewhere. You value that action to decide what this deal must offer.
3
New cards
What is a reservation point?
The least favorable deal you will accept; based on the value of your BATNA.
4
New cards
What is a buyer's reservation price?
The maximum price the buyer is willing to pay.
5
New cards
What is a seller's reservation price?
The minimum price the seller is willing to accept.
6
New cards
What is an aspiration or target?
The outcome you hope to achieve. It is different from the worst deal you will accept.
7
New cards
What is an opening offer?
Your first proposal. It can influence the reference point for later bargaining.
8
New cards
What does ZOPA stand for?
Zone of Possible Agreement: the overlap between the parties' acceptable outcomes.
9
New cards
When does a price-only ZOPA exist?
When the buyer's maximum is at least the seller's minimum: seller minimum <= price <= buyer maximum.
10
New cards
How do you calculate the width of a price-only ZOPA?
Buyer maximum minus seller minimum. A negative result means no overlap on price alone.
11
New cards
Buyer maximum $180; seller minimum $135. What is the ZOPA?
From $135 to $180. Its width is $45.
12
New cards
Buyer maximum $110; seller minimum $90; deal $100. How does each benefit relative to their limit?
The buyer pays $10 below the maximum; the seller receives $10 above the minimum.
13
New cards
Buyer maximum $80; seller minimum $100. Is a price-only agreement possible?
No. There is a $20 gap. Explore additional issues or alternatives rather than assuming a price compromise works.
14
New cards
For a multi-issue package; what should you compare with your BATNA?
The value of the entire package; including nonprice terms; rather than just its headline price.
15
New cards
Must you reach a deal for a negotiation to be successful?
No. Walking away is appropriate when available terms are worse than your credible alternative.
16
New cards
What is distributive bargaining?
Claiming a share of existing value. In price-only bargaining; one side's price gain is the other side's loss.
17
New cards
What is an anchor?
A reference point; often an opening offer; that can shape later judgments and offers.
18
New cards
What are objective criteria?
Standards beyond either side's wishes; such as comparable transactions; measurable performance; or consistent policies.
19
New cards
Do objective criteria eliminate all fairness disagreements?
No. Parties may prefer different standards; often because those standards favor their side.
20
New cards
What is perspective-taking in negotiation?
Considering the other side's interests; constraints; and alternatives to understand their choices.
21
New cards
What should a negotiation preparation document include?
Issues and priorities; interests; BATNA and reservation point; target; counterpart assumptions; questions; opening and possible trades.
22
New cards
What is a conditional concession?
Movement linked to something useful in return: If we change payment timing; I can discuss the price.
23
New cards
What are the three parts of the negotiation journal?
Preparation and a behavior goal; immediate reflection; reflection after debrief and counterpart feedback.
24
New cards
How does an observation differ from an interpretation?
An observation describes a checkable event; an interpretation explains what someone thinks it means.
25
New cards
What is an attribution?
An explanation of the cause or motive behind an event; such as assuming someone acted from distrust.
26
New cards
What is an identity threat?
A concern that the dispute challenges who you are; such as being competent; fair; loyal; or deserving.
27
New cards
What is advocacy before inquiry?
Defending a conclusion before investigating the other side's account and relevant evidence.
28
New cards
What is a productive way to open a difficult conversation?
State the purpose; describe specific observations and impact; and invite the other person's account.
29
New cards
How does intent differ from impact?
Intent is what someone meant to do; impact is what happened to others.
30
New cards
Does lack of harmful intent prove there was no unequal impact?
No. Intent and impact are separate questions.
31
New cards
Does unequal impact alone prove a particular motive?
No. It warrants investigation but does not establish exactly what someone intended.
32
New cards
What does acknowledgment mean?
Recognizing someone's experience or concern without necessarily agreeing with every fact or accepting blame.
33
New cards
A manager says; I meant well; so there is no problem. What is wrong?
The manager treats intent as proof about impact. Examine the actual treatment; opportunities; and effects.
34
New cards
What three levels should a durable workplace agreement address?
Substance; relationship; and process.
35
New cards
What is the substance of an agreement?
Concrete terms such as role; resources; compensation; and expectations.
36
New cards
What is the relationship level of an agreement?
Acknowledgment; trust; and how the parties communicate.
37
New cards
What is the process level of an agreement?
Metrics; feedback; review dates; escalation; and how disagreements will be handled.
38
New cards
Why is We will do better and review it later a weak agreement?
It leaves actions; responsible people; criteria; resources; and timing unclear.
39
New cards
What must you check about promises involving people outside the room?
Whether the negotiator has authority and which approvals are still needed.
40
New cards
How can an individual reduce social penalties for negotiating; according to the slides?
Combine assertiveness with friendliness; explain shared benefits; ask questions; and consider coalitions.
41
New cards
What system changes can reduce gender-related negotiation penalties?
Consistent treatment; clear salary ranges and review schedules; and negotiation education and mentoring.
42
New cards
What is the difference between a position and an interest?
A position is a demand; an interest is the reason behind it. Different terms may satisfy the same interest.
43
New cards
What is integrative negotiation?
Creating and claiming value by learning interests and combining issues to serve both parties.
44
New cards
What is a congruent issue?
An issue where both sides prefer the same outcome.
45
New cards
Both sides want June delivery but compromise on July. What went wrong?
They missed a congruent issue and chose a worse result for both.
46
New cards
What is logrolling?
Trading across issues: give on something you value less to gain on something you value more.
47
New cards
Does integrative negotiation require revealing your exact walkaway?
No. Sharing interests and relative priorities can reveal trades without disclosing your precise reservation point.
48
New cards
What two dimensions define the Dual-Concerns Model?
Assertiveness: concern for your own outcomes. Cooperativeness: concern for the other party's outcomes.
49
New cards
In the Dual-Concerns Model; what is competing?
High assertiveness and low cooperativeness.
50
New cards
In the Dual-Concerns Model; what is accommodating?
Low assertiveness and high cooperativeness.
51
New cards
In the Dual-Concerns Model; what is avoiding?
Low assertiveness and low cooperativeness.
52
New cards
How do compromising and problem solving differ?
Compromising meets partway; problem solving actively seeks terms serving both sides. Problem solving is high on both concerns.
53
New cards
Is a compromise automatically the best agreement?
No. Different priorities or shared preferences may allow a better package.
54
New cards
What is the negotiator's dilemma?
Cooperation and disclosure help create value; but each party may fear exploitation and compete in ways that reduce joint value.
55
New cards
What is a Pareto improvement?
A feasible change that makes at least one party better off without making anyone worse off.
56
New cards
What is Pareto efficiency?
No feasible change can improve one party's result without worsening someone else's result.
57
New cards
What is the Pareto frontier?
The set of feasible Pareto-efficient agreements.
58
New cards
What does a point below the Pareto frontier imply?
At least one party could improve without harming anyone. Some value is left on the table.
59
New cards
Does Pareto efficiency mean equal or fair?
No. An unequal allocation can still be Pareto efficient.
60
New cards
Is changing outcomes from (6040) to (7040) a Pareto improvement?
Yes. One party gains and the other stays equally well off.
61
New cards
Is changing outcomes from (6040) to (8030) a Pareto improvement?
No. The second party loses; even though the combined total rises.
62
New cards
What is a contingent contract?
An agreement whose terms depend on a specified future event. It can turn different expectations into a workable deal.
63
New cards
What is the weighted package-score formula?
Add weight x option value for every issue: score = w1*v1 + w2*v2 + ... . Weights sum to 1.
64
New cards
Why should you score your BATNA using the same system as proposed deals?
So the alternative and the deals can be compared on a common basis.
65
New cards
Why can price alone be misleading when comparing packages?
Service; timing; risk; and other terms can outweigh an attractive headline price.
66
New cards
What does indifference checking test in a scoring system?
Whether you really value equal-score packages equally. If not; the scoring system needs revision.
67
New cards
How can option-value ranges distort issue weights?
An issue with a 0-100 range can affect totals more than one with a 0-10 range; even with equal stated weights.
68
New cards
Price weight .5/value 75; service .3/value 60; payment .2/value 100. What is the score?
37.5 + 18 + 20 = 75.5 points.
69
New cards
When might an additive scoring system need adjustment?
When issues interact; such as one term being valuable only if another is included. Score the interaction or the whole combination.
70
New cards
What does MESO stand for?
Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers.
71
New cards
In a MESO; equivalent to whom?
Equivalent in value to you. The other side may prefer one package; which helps reveal their priorities.
72
New cards
How do MESOs help you learn without direct priority disclosure?
The other side's preferences and reactions reveal clues about which features matter most.
73
New cards
How many MESO packages do the slides recommend presenting at once?
No more than three; to avoid overwhelming the counterpart.
74
New cards
The other side rejects all your MESOs. What should you ask?
Which is least objectionable; and why? Ask what prevents it from working.
75
New cards
Why should MESOs remain complete packages?
Their value depends on the combination. Letting the other side cherry-pick can reduce your total value.
76
New cards
Do packages scoring 78; 75.5; and 75 constitute true MESOs?
No. They are multiple offers; but they are not equivalent to you.
77
New cards
How can MESOs help at different stages?
Early: anchor. Middle: learn priorities and trade. Late: explore closeness to acceptable terms; reactions do not prove the exact reservation point.
78
New cards
What are the Federated Sciences coalition totals?
Alone: each 0. Stockman+Turbo: 440K. Stockman+United: 380K. Turbo+United: 300K. All three: 480K.
79
New cards
Why are the 260K; 180K; and 120K algebra values not standalone earnings?
They are weights reproducing pair totals. Each actual standalone coalition earns zero; and those weights sum to 560K rather than 480K.
80
New cards
How do you derive Stockman's algebra weight from pair totals?
s = (440 + 380 - 300)/2 = 260K. Then t=180K and u=120K.
81
New cards
How does equal reduction make the 560K algebra weights fit 480K?
Subtract the 80K excess equally: 80/3 = 26.6667K from each weight.
82
New cards
How does proportional adjustment make those weights fit 480K?
Multiply each by 480/560 = 6/7. Results: about 222.86K; 154.29K; and 102.86K.
83
New cards
How much does United add to an existing Stockman-Turbo coalition?
480K - 440K = 40K. That context-specific contribution is not an automatic entitlement.
84
New cards
How much does Stockman add to an existing Turbo-United coalition?
480K - 300K = 180K.
85
New cards
Is a coalition's total payoff one member's personal BATNA?
No. The individual must secure a share through an actual agreement with the coalition partners.
86
New cards
What is the Shapley value?
A member's average marginal contribution across every possible joining order.
87
New cards
What is a marginal contribution?
The coalition's value after someone joins minus its value immediately before they join.
88
New cards
How many joining orders exist for three parties?
3! = 6 orders.
89
New cards
What does each party add in the joining order Stockman-United-Turbo?
Stockman adds 0; United adds 380K; Turbo adds 100K. Total: 480K.
90
New cards
What is United's corrected Shapley value?
(40 + 380 + 40 + 300 + 0 + 0)/6 = 126.67K; approximately.
91
New cards
What arithmetic error appears in the Shapley slide?
United is printed as 106.67K instead of 126.67K. The corrected three shares sum to the available 480K.
92
New cards
Are Shapley allocations guaranteed bargaining outcomes?
No. They are one principled allocation rule; actual bargaining can produce different shares.
93
New cards
What is a negotiation campaign?
A series of linked negotiations across people or groups whose outcomes affect one another.
94
New cards
What should you consider when sequencing a campaign?
Existing relationships; control of resources; compatible interests; persuadable parties; and how one agreement changes others.
95
New cards
Why should you update your BATNA during multiparty talks?
New alliances can create or remove alternatives and change the consequences of being excluded.
96
New cards
What distinction matters when judging warmth and dominance in the AI study?
Warmth was associated with agreement and value across negotiations; dominance with individual gains conditional on agreement and greater impasse risk.
97
New cards
Why can excellent terms in completed deals be a misleading success measure?
They ignore negotiations that fail. Impasse risk can offset favorable terms when a deal happens.
98
New cards
What were the reported benefits of structured private preparation by AI negotiators?
Strong integrative points and value creation; with high counterpart subjective value.
99
New cards
Why should the AI findings not be treated as proven instructions for human-AI negotiation?
They mostly describe correlations in AI-to-AI; single-encounter tasks; human-AI use needs direct testing.
100
New cards
What are the five intuitive moral foundations in the lecture?
Harm/care; fairness/reciprocity; in-group/loyalty; authority/respect; purity/sanctity.