Law of Tort Flashcards

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/36

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

A complete set of vocabulary flashcards based on the provided lecture notes covering the fundamentals of tort law, trespass, assault, battery, false imprisonment, and relevant case precedents.

Last updated 10:55 AM on 9/30/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

37 Terms

1
New cards

Tort

A branch of civil law dealing with legal duties between people that are generally imposed by law rather than created by agreement or contract.

2
New cards

Objectives of Tort

The key legal objectives of tort law: appeasement, justice, deterrence, and compensation.

3
New cards

Mental Element in Tort

The state of mind required to establish liability in tort, ranging from intention to negligence, as well as strict liability.

4
New cards

Actionable Per Se

Torts that do not require proof of damage or loss to bring a legal claim, such as trespass.

5
New cards

Negligence

A state of mind characterised by carelessness, where a person does something intending damage or fails to take sufficient care to ensure that damage does not occur.

6
New cards

Natural Person

An ordinary human being acting as a party in a tort claim.

7
New cards

Legal Person

An organisation or entity recognized by law as having legal rights and obligations, such as a company or corporate body.

8
New cards

Claimant

The person or party who brings a tort claim.

9
New cards

Defendant

The person or party accused of committing a tort.

10
New cards

Tortfeasor

The person who committed the tort.

11
New cards

Vicarious Liability

A legal rule where one person or entity is held legally responsible for another person's actions, particularly within an employment context.

12
New cards

Subrogation

A legal mechanism in tort where an insurance company gets involved on behalf of a party.

13
New cards

Characteristics of Trespass

The core features of trespass: it must be intentional, direct, actionable per se, and protect fundamental rights.

14
New cards

Stanley V Powell (1891)

Case establishing that fault (intention or negligence) must be proven for trespass to the person, rejecting strict liability.

15
New cards

Fowler V Lanning (1959)

Case confirming that the claimant bears the burden of proving the defendant's relevant fault in a trespass claim.

16
New cards

Letang V Cooper (1965)

Case confirming that intention is the required fault element for trespass.

17
New cards

Direct Interference

A requirement of trespass where the harm is an immediate result of the act (e.g., a thrown log hitting someone), as opposed to indirect harm which falls under negligence.

18
New cards

Trespass to Land

The oldest tort (over 800 years old) protecting a claimant's lawful and exclusive possession of land, including substrata and airspace necessary for enjoyment.

19
New cards

Possession (Land)

The exclusive right to occupy land coupled with the intention to exclude others.

20
New cards

Kelsen V Imperial Tobacco Ltd (1957)

Case showing that a tenant with exclusive possession can bring a claim for trespass to land, and that trespass extends into airspace above the land.

21
New cards

League Against Cruel Sports V Scott (1985)

Case establishing that intention to trespass does not need to be expressly stated and can be inferred from a party's actions.

22
New cards

Conway V George Wimpey (1951)

Case demonstrating that lack of knowledge that land is private does not automatically prevent liability for trespass.

23
New cards

Southwark London Borough Council v Williams [1971]

Case establishing that the defense of necessity in trespass to land requires an imminent threat to life or property, not social necessity.

24
New cards

Assault

An intentional act that threatens violence or produces in the claimant a reasonable expectation of immediate unlawful force.

25
New cards

Thomas v National Union of Miners (1986)

Case establishing that a claimant's fear of violence must be reasonable, meaning no assault exists if the claimant knows the threat cannot be carried out.

26
New cards

Battery

The direct and intentional application of force to another person without consent.

27
New cards

Fagan V Metropolitan Police Commissioner (1969)

Case establishing that battery can occur when an initial unintentional contact is knowingly maintained without being rectified.

28
New cards

Wilson V Pringle (1987)

Case holding that battery requires intentional contact and proof that the touching was hostile.

29
New cards

Collins V Wilcock (1984)

Case clarifying that ordinary, socially acceptable physical contact does not constitute battery.

30
New cards

Cole V Turner (1704)

Case establishing the traditional rule that even the slightest unlawful touching can amount to battery.

31
New cards

Re F; F V West Berkshire Health Authority (1990)

Case questioning the hostility requirement, establishing that touching can be battery without hostility if there is no legal excuse.

32
New cards

Transferred Intention

A doctrine accepted in battery (e.g., Livingstone V Ministry of Defence (1984)) where an intention to hit one person transfers to an unintended hit victim.

33
New cards

False Imprisonment

The unlawful, complete restriction of a claimant's freedom of movement, which does not strictly require being locked inside a room.

34
New cards

Meering V Graham-White Aviation Co Ltd (1919)

Case ruling that false imprisonment can occur even if the claimant is unaware of the restriction on their movement at the time.

35
New cards

Robinson V Balmain New Ferry Company Ltd (1910)

Case demonstrating that imposing a reasonable condition before allowing a person to leave does not necessarily constitute false imprisonment.

36
New cards

Rule in Wilkinson V Downton

A distinct tort that requires intention and is not actionable per se, addressing intentionally inflicted indirect harm or psychiatric damage.

37
New cards

O v A

Case reaffirming the rule in Wilkinson V Downton by identifying three required elements: a conduct element, a mental element, and a consequence element.