MST 100 - Projecting Canada Documentary, Cultural Policy, & the National Film Board

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/17

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Last updated 11:48 PM on 9/19/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

18 Terms

1
New cards

From Media text to media institution

When studying media, we can ask:

  • Text

    • What does this film show?

  • Representation

    • What image of Canada does it construct?

    • What do we watch?

      • Ex. Indigenous peoples not represented in documentary

      • Hockey

  • Institution

    • Who produced it? Under what mandate?

  • Policy & power

    • Why is the state involved?


2
New cards

Druick’s starting point: documentary + cultural policy

Two things come together at the NFB

  • Documentary film representing social reality plus cultural policy government involvement in cultural production equal the NFB

    • Decisions, institutions, etc.


3
New cards

What is cultural policy?

  • Government decisions and programs that shape:

    • Cultural production and participation

    • What cultural institutions exist

    • What kinds of media are supported

    • What gets produced and circulated

    • Who gets access

    • How national culture is represented

  • Druick asks us to think about cultural policy as something that can help produce citizenship and belonging


4
New cards

More than “supporting Canadian culture”

  • Cultural policy doesn’t simply fund culture

  • It can also help establish:

    • Institutions → practices → knowledge → belonging

  • Druick:

    • Cultural institutions provide ways for citizens to “map the social world”

      • Think about this in relation to shows we watched

Media can help make society visible to itself.

5
New cards

The NFB doesn’t just represent culture

  • The NFB represents a population

    • Who are canadians?

    • How do they live?

    • What problems do they face?

    • How should society respond

  • Documentary becomes a way of producing knowledge about society


6
New cards

Documentary + Social Science

Both claim to tell us something about “reality”

7
New cards

The case becomes the population

  • One person → a social type

  • One community → a social condition

  • One story → a claim about society


8
New cards

Documentary =/= unmediated reality

  • Elect → frame → interview→ edit → narrate → generalize

  • Druick argues that documentary’s claims to reality should not be confused with unmediated observation

    • Our access to reality has been organized to a media form

  • Documentary produces a way of knowing


9
New cards

The “voice of God”

  • Druick connects the documentary “voice of God” to similar claims of authoritative knowledge in social science

  • The voice seems to come from nowhere


10
New cards

There is no “God’s eye view”

There is no view from nowhere

  • Every representation involves:

    • A position

    • A selection

    • An institutional context

    • A way of organizing knowledge

  • Who gets to observe whom?


11
New cards

From imagining the Nation to Knowing the Population

Media can participate in:

  • Imagining the nation

  • Knowing the population

They create shared field of imagination

12
New cards

The NFB shows Canada back to itself

  • Druick argues that NFB documentaries: show the nation back to itself

  • The population is

    • Observed → categorized → represented → circulated

  • Canada becomes something Canadians can see.


13
New cards

But audiences matter

  • The NFB did not simply address: “EVERY CANADIAN”

  • Its films often created:

    • limited • temporary • targeted publics

  • Different films addressed different:

    • communities • needs • social problems • audiences

  • There isn't necessarily one national audience


14
New cards

“Film Acts”

  • A documentary does not merely describe reality.

  • It can:

    • Inform

    • Educate

    • Define a problem’propose a response

    • Shape how people understand policy

  • Films are acts of meaning making


15
New cards

so…Propaganda?

She is cautious about “propaganda” because it can imply: powerful message → passive audience

16
New cards

Communication as a struggle over meaning

  • Not: producer → message → passive audience

  • Instead: meaning is never final

    • Films enter an ongoing dialogue

    • Institutions have objectives

    • Filmmakers make choices

    • Audience interpret

    • Meanings change over time

    • Films can be exceed their interested purpose


17
New cards

Canada returned in an “Altered Form”

  • Everyday Canadian lids is:

  • Filmed → framed → narrated → edited → retired to Canadians

  • Druick:

    • The familiar can be validating… but it is always mediated


18
New cards

Projecting Canada

  • Anderson - The media helps us imagine the national community.

  • Gasher - Canadian media develop within a tradition of nation-building

  • Druick = Documentary and cultural policy help make Canadian society visible and knowable

  • NFB - Government • Institution • Filmmaker • Film • Citizen