Constitutional Law: Three-Term Limit Rule for Elective Local Officials

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/11

flashcard set

Earn XP

Description and Tags

Vocabulary flashcards covering the constitutional and statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and landmark Supreme Court decisions governing the three-term limit rule for local elective officials in the Philippines.

12 Terms

1
New cards

Article X, §8 of the Philippine Constitution

The constitutional provision establishing that the term of office for elective local officials (except barangay officials) is three years, prohibiting service for more than three consecutive terms, and prescribing that voluntary renunciation of office for any length of time does not interrupt the continuity of service for the full term for which the official was elected.

2
New cards

Section 43(b) of the Local Government Code (R.A. No. 7160)

The statutory provision restating that no local elective official shall serve for more than three consecutive terms in the same position, and that voluntary renunciation of office does not interrupt the continuity of service for the full term for which the elective official was elected.

3
New cards

Two Requisites for the Three-Term Limit Rule

The two concurring conditions required under jurisprudence before the three-term disqualification can apply: 1) that the local official concerned has been elected for three consecutive terms in the same local government post, and 2) that the official has fully served three consecutive terms.

4
New cards

Succession by Operation of Law

The automatic assumption of an elective post by a lower official (such as a vice-mayor assuming the mayorship under §44(a) of R.A. No. 7160 upon the death of the incumbent) without being elected to that post, which cannot be counted as a full term toward the three-term limit.

5
New cards

Voluntary Renunciation of Office

An official's choice to resign or abandon their post before the term ends, which the law treats as non-interruptive of continuous service only if the official was actually elected to the term being served.

6
New cards

Involuntary Severance from Office

The premature loss of office pursuant to a legal process (such as vacating office under a COMELEC writ of execution in an election protest), which amounts to a legitimate interruption of continuity of service and prevents the official from having fully served the term.

7
New cards

Presumptive Winner

A proclaimed candidate who assumes office on the strength of a proclamation by the Board of Canvassers subject to the final outcome of an election protest; if the proclamation is later declared null and void, their service is deemed founded on a void proclamation rather than a valid election.

8
New cards

Section 6 of R.A. No. 6646

The statutory provision mandating that the court or COMELEC continue the trial and hearing of a disqualification case to its final conclusion even after the candidate sought to be disqualified has been voted for, proclaimed, and has assumed office.

9
New cards

Monsod Proposal

The proposal adopted by the 1986 Constitutional Commission replacing an absolute perpetual disqualification after three consecutive terms with a temporary bar requiring a hiatus of at least one election before running again, preserving the electorate's freedom of choice.

10
New cards

Article VII, §4 of the Philippine Constitution

The constitutional rule governing presidential term limits, providing that the President is ineligible for any reelection and that no person who has succeeded as President and served for more than four years shall be qualified for election to the same office at any time.

11
New cards

Borja, Jr. v. COMELEC and Capco, Jr. (G.R. No. 133495)

The Supreme Court decision holding that a vice-mayor who becomes mayor by succession upon the incumbent's death and finishes the unexpired term has not served a term for the purpose of the three-term limit because the official was not elected to the office of mayor.

12
New cards

Lonzanida v. COMELEC and Muli (G.R. No. 135150)

The Supreme Court decision holding that an incumbent unseated by a final COMELEC judgment in an election protest before the expiration of the term cannot have that term counted toward the three-term limit because he was not duly elected and did not fully serve the term due to involuntary severance.