1/53
Looks like no tags are added yet.
```
Felony murder rule
D is guilty of murder if a death results from D's conduct while committing or attempting a felony, even with no intent to kill
Felony murder: does the killing need to be intentional?
No. It covers intentional, knowing, reckless, negligent, and even accidental killings
BRAKERS
The enumerated felonies for felony murder: Burglary, Robbery, Arson, Kidnapping, Escape, Rape, Sex offenses
Felony murder: what replaces the intent to kill?
The intent to commit the underlying felony
Intentional murder, 2nd degree (NYPL 125.25)
With intent to cause the death of a person, D causes the death of that person or a third person
Felony murder: which mens rea does it eliminate?
Only the mens rea as to the death. Everything about the underlying felony must still be proven
Felony murder: 3 things the prosecution still must prove
(1) D committed the act of the underlying felony (2) D had the mens rea for that felony (3) the felony caused the death
Felony murder: first way to understand it
Any act done with intent to commit a felony that causes death is murder
Felony murder: second way to understand it
Any act known to be dangerous to life and likely to cause death, done to commit a felony, that causes death is murder
4 components of criminal liability
Actus reus, mens rea, causation, result
Causation: 2 requirements
Actual cause and legal (proximate) cause
Actual cause
But for D's act, would the result have happened when it did? Necessary but not enough on its own
Legal (proximate) cause
The result was foreseeable and not highly extraordinary
Intervening cause
Anything that happens after D's act but before the result
Superseding cause
An intervening cause strong enough to break the chain. D is no longer the proximate cause and is not liable
Proximate cause: D's contribution was de minimis
No proximate cause
Proximate cause: the intervening cause was a response to D's conduct
Probably still proximate cause
Proximate cause: the intervening cause was independent of D's conduct
Depends on whether it was foreseeable
Proximate cause: D's intended result happened in an unexpected way
Still proximate cause
Proximate cause: a natural event or accident intervenes
Was it so highly extraordinary that D's act is no longer the proximate cause?
Proximate cause: another person's intentional free will act intervenes
Most courts say it breaks the chain. D is not the proximate cause
Sam's gun accidentally fires during a robbery and kills the clerk
Felony murder. Robbery is a BRAKERS felony, Sam intended to rob, and the robbery was the but for and proximate cause of death
5 limitations on felony murder
(1) Enumerated felonies (2) Inherently dangerous felony (3) Merger (4) Res gestae (5) NY affirmative defense
Enumerated felonies limitation
If only listed felonies count, a death during an unlisted felony is not felony murder
Inherently dangerous felony limitation
Felony murder applies only if the underlying felony is inherently dangerous. Enumerated felonies always qualify
Inherently dangerous: majority view
Look at the facts of how the felony was actually committed
Inherently dangerous: minority view
Look at the felony in the abstract. It counts only if it can never be committed without a substantial risk of death
Merger rule
If the felony is not independent of the killing, it merges into the homicide and cannot support felony murder
Independent felony
D had a purpose apart from physically injuring the victim
Why the merger rule exists
Without it, every assault that ends in death would be murder, and intent to kill would never matter
Merger: 4 questions to ask
(1) Was the fatal act the same as the felony? (2) Did D have an independent purpose? (3) Was it an assaultive felony? (4) Is it an enumerated felony?
Res gestae requirement
The killing must happen during and in furtherance of the felony
Res gestae: when does the felony start and end?
Starts once the attempt has begun. Ends only after flight is over
Res gestae: 2 approaches to who did the killing
Agency approach and proximate causation approach
Agency approach
No felony murder if someone other than D or an accomplice did the killing
Proximate causation approach
D is liable for any killing that is the but for and proximate result of the felony, no matter who did the killing
D robs a store and a cop kills a bystander: agency approach
Not felony murder. The cop, not D or an accomplice, did the killing
D robs a store and a cop kills a bystander: proximate causation approach
Felony murder. No robbery means no shootout, and a police shootout is a foreseeable result of an armed robbery
NY affirmative defense to felony murder (NYPL 125.25(3))
A defense for a participant who did not do the killing, if D proves all four elements
NY affirmative defense: 4 elements
D (1) did not commit or aid the killing (2) was not armed (3) had no reason to believe anyone was armed (4) had no reason to believe anyone would cause serious injury or death
Dan waits outside an unarmed burglary, but Sam secretly brings a gun and kills the owner
Dan has the NY affirmative defense. If Dan knew Sam had a gun, the defense fails
Inchoate crime
A crime that is not completed
Attempt
Taking a punishable step toward committing a crime without finishing it
Attempt: 2 elements
Actus reus and mens rea
Why attempt requires an act
The law does not punish guilty thoughts alone
Actus reus of attempt
A substantial step: D crossed from mere preparation into actually beginning the crime
Dangerous proximity test
How close was D to finishing? Remote acts are preparation. Acts near completion are attempt
NYPL definition of attempt
An act done with intent to commit a crime, tending but failing to effect its commission
Mens rea of attempt
Specific intent: D's purpose or conscious object was to cause the result
Maya walks into a store masked and armed to rob it, but is tackled before she says a word
Attempted robbery. She had specific intent and was in dangerous proximity to completing it
Maya buys a ski mask at home and thinks about robbing a store
Not attempt. Mere preparation and guilty thoughts
A death occurs during an attempted robbery
Can still be felony murder, since the rule covers attempted felonies
```