3.2 Pavolini, Béland & Jawad (2017) Religion and social policy + Lecture Notes

0.0(0)
Studied by 0 people
call kaiCall Kai
learnLearn
examPractice Test
spaced repetitionSpaced Repetition
heart puzzleMatch
flashcardsFlashcards
GameKnowt Play
Card Sorting

1/21

encourage image

There's no tags or description

Looks like no tags are added yet.

Last updated 3:45 AM on 10/10/26
Name
Mastery
Learn
Test
Matching
Spaced
Call with Kai
Chat

No analytics yet

Send a link to your students to track their progress

22 Terms

1
New cards

Social Policy

Religion asserts itself through ___ to meet human needs in security, education, work, health & well-being

2
New cards

High religiosity

High insecurity =

3
New cards

Welfare State

  • Government covers social and economic security (income, pensions, medical)

  • Not just taxes and wars

  • Basically why religious attendance declined… bc why else would u attend if the gov already provides everything for you


4
New cards

Is the PH Welfare State?

No, we don’t have fiscal capacity so we just target social assistance

5
New cards

Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Framework - Triple PS

  1. Problem Stream - On the ground

  2. Policy Stream - Think tanks & economists

  3. Politics Stream - Main government


  • Intersection of these 3 streams created Policy Window

  • Allows for agenda-setting and policy adaptation

  • Religion can technically be anywhere in this process


6
New cards

Three Levels of Religion-Social Policy Nexus

  1. Political Party Level (Macro)

  2. FBO Level (Meso)

  3. Individual Level (Micro)


7
New cards

Political parties as Macro Religion-Social Policy

  • Examine political parties with explicit religious inspirations and their role in fostering welfare reforms

  • How religious parties rose to prominence and influenced ideological positions on social protection


8
New cards

FBOs as Meso Religion-Social Policy

Role of religious affiliated groups in delivering welfare services like health, education, and family support

Service provision serves as source of power and social legitimation

9
New cards

Indivduals as Micro Religion-Social Policy

How individuals faith, values, and church attendances shapes views on public policy


Indirect - Voting behavior

Direct - Fundamentally different welfare preferences than secular

10
New cards

Casanova’s State Separation Patterns

  • Formal establishment with Free exercise (e.g., England, Nordic countries)

  • Formal disestablishment with Strict regulation (e.g., France)

  • Informal establishments (Germany and Southern Europe)

  • Strict disestablishment with High pluralism (e.g., USA)


11
New cards

Formal establishment with Free exercise

(e.g., England, Nordic countries)

12
New cards

Formal disestablishment with Strict regulation

(e.g., France)

13
New cards

Informal establishments

(Germany and Southern Europe)

14
New cards

Strict disestablishment with High pluralism

(e.g., USA)

15
New cards

(Rokkan) 1st Wave of Religion in Welfare State

Religion associated with secularization and modernization. Shaped welfare expansion through principles like subsidiarity and moral obligations to the poor

16
New cards

(Rokkan) 2nd Wave of Religion in Welfare State

Conflict between Church and State control education and the protection of workers.

17
New cards

Protective layer

Religious organizations have often been “crowded-in” rather than replaced by the welfare state to act as a ____ between the State (public sphere) and the family (private sphere)

18
New cards

Typology of FBOs (PCAB)

Faith-permated: Everything

Faith-centered: Evident in services

Faith-affiliated: Only leadership

Faith-background: History lang


19
New cards

Church attendance, welfare attitudes

____ is often a more powerful predictor of ____ than specific religious denominations.

20
New cards

Rational Choice Perspective

Individuals who feel “insured” by their religious community may prefer lower levels of state social insurance

21
New cards

Conservative Preferences

Frequent churchgoers refrain from voting for redistributive parties and instead, turning to parties that pledge to conserve and protect religious values

22
New cards

Welfare Chauvinism

Populist right-wing parties increasingly use cultural and religious identity to advocate for restricting welfare access to national “insiders” while excluding immigrants