1/6
Looks like no tags are added yet.
was genetics important
It was needed to clarify why selection works and overturn a theoretical objection to evolution by natural selection
It provided a rigorous basis for understanding how evolution works
It enormously enriched our understanding of how evolution works, providing often counter-intuitive, but empirically correct, results
theoretical objection to evolution by natural selection
The decline of black pepper moths was not by itself enough evidence for natural selection
e.g. could have just been covered in soot
Needed to know that you are tracking an allele
why was Darwin confused about inheritance
Darwin understood natural selection but did not know the genetic mechanism of inheritance.
Blending inheritance was the belief that offspring inherit a mixture of their parents' traits.
This suggested advantageous traits could become diluted over generations.
Natural selection requires heritable variation within populations.
Darwin struggled to explain how useful variations could persist across generations.
He proposed pangenesis, an incorrect theory that body parts produced particles passed to offspring.
Gregor Mendel demonstrated particulate inheritance, where inherited factors remain distinct.
Rediscovery of Mendel's work around 1900 helped explain how genetic variation persists for natural selection to act upon.
Jenkin’s objection - blending inheritance destroys variation
Assumed phenotypes were inherited by blending inheritance (also wrong)
Offspring look like a mix of both parents
e.g. short + big = in the middle
a new 'type' cannot easily increase in frequency because the mode of inheritance dilutes it each generation
e.g white + red flower = pink
White + pink flower = less pink
Eventually the population moves to a position – through 'rules' of inheritance alone, in which there is no variation
No variation = no one is fitter = natural selection cannot work
blending inheritance
Wrong
Inheritance is mendelian
| R | r |
R | RR | Rr |
r | Rr | rr |
1:2:1
Understanding that inheritance is mendelian rescued natural selection as a concept by showing why selection matters and inheritance doesn't
Our understanding of genetics has become a framework for understanding the fate of new mutations
This has been central to the clarification of the process of evolution : when, how and on what selection acts

maths
Let there be two alleles (A and a) hence three genotypes (AA, Aa and aa)
Let us assume frequency of A is p, of a q (p=1-q)
Let us assume frequency of AA, Aa and aa, are x, y and z.
Note freq of A = x +y/2 = p
A major advangtage of this insight is that we can do the same calculations using gamete not genetype frequencies (P2 +q2 = 2pq)
If p is the frequency of A and q the frequency if am then in the next generation
p’ = p2+pq = p(p+q) = p
q’ = q2+pq = q(p+q) = q
what if we add in selection
Assume AA has fitness 1+s, Aa fitness 1+hs and aa fitness 1
p'= [p2 (1+s) + 0.5 (2 pq) (1+hs)]/w
W is the weighted mean fitness – weighted in proportion to the abundance of each of the 3 genotypes.
Finding invasion conditions
Will the allele invade when rare?
We take the slope on the line relating p' and p
Dp' /dp
When p is rare, this is greater than 1
Invasion happens if 1+t > 1, t>0
p’ = p2(1+s)+pq(1+t) /W