1/33
Looks like no tags are added yet.
Allport’ visit to Freud
writes Freud a letter stating that he would be in town and he wanted to meet
tells him about a boy he saw on the train who had an intense phobia of getting dirty
Freud asked “was that little boy you“
felt that Freud was digging for unconscious motives that did not exist and left
Allport’s wide ranging contributions
Challenged depth theories and behaviorism. Shifted to observable and self-report
An understanding of how personality theories differ from one another (ideographic and nomothetic)
An emphasis on uniqueness
Earliest paper and pencil personality tests
The advancement of personality as an American science
Functional autonomy
an adult's current motives, interests, and habits become independent of (autonomous from) the original childhood or biological needs that first created them
Allport and uniqueness
human personality is deeply unique and cannot be fully understood by simply grouping people into general categories
Uniqueness
Conscious experiences
Two definitions of trait
A neuropsychic structure having the capacity to render many stimuli functionally equivalent and to initiate and guide equivalent (consistent) forms of adaptive and expressive behavior.
A family of habits or widely generalized habit systems
Theory of values
measures an individual's relative preference across six basic types of interests and values
Theoretical
Economic
Aesthetic
Social
Political
Religious
Trait theory allport
4 to 5 thousand traits with 17,500 names
Traits exist more than a name, can be viewed
Traits are determinative (trait NOT stimulus determines behavior)
Act inconsistent with trait is not proof of non-existence of that trait
How are traits studied
idiographic approaches (examining unique, individual personalities rather than just general group averages)
Difficulty studying traits
No observable physical process
No single behavior is due to a single trait
No set number of traits per person
Traits ebb and flow within an individual
Development of the proprium
a self-system that organizes experiences
We have an inherited tendency to learn and growth
We develop unique modes of adjusting to and mastering the environment around us
Self-awareness- what matters to each of us
Cattell vs Allport
Believed in grouping traits into manageable groups
Theory based in psychoanalytic ideas
Psychology has to be objective and mathematical
Traits are “erg” driven- not autonomous
Traits can be accurately measured
Behavior can be accurately predicted
Personality: that which permits a prediction of what a person will do in a specific situation
Factor analysis
renders the data more orderly by organizing the variables studied into factors
The “factor loadings” are the correlations between each variable and the hypothetical factor
criticisms of factor analysis
t reduces unique, dynamic individual personalities into artificial, statistical averages that fail to reflect real-world behavior
human psychology cannot be accurately captured by mathematical reductionism alone
Cattell's trait theory
defines human personality as a combination of underlying building blocks called traits, which can be measured and used to predict behavior
16 personality factors
Complex scientific names
Current use has more simple names
all traits fall into 16 groups
Might not be the most accurate or useful answers
Specification Equation
How a person will behave in a specific situation
Performance= (importance of trait in situation) (trait) + (importance of trait2 in situation) (trait2)+ etc.
The big five
Extraversion- Warmth, gregariousness, assertiveness, activity, excitement seeking, positive emotions
Agreeableness- Trust, straightforwardness, altruism, compliance, modesty, tendermindedness
Neuroticism- Anxiety, angry hostility, depression, self consciousness, impulsiveness, vulnerability
Openness- Fantasy, aesthetics, feelings, actions, ideas, values
Conscientiousness- Competence, order, dutifulness, achievement, striving, self-discipline, deliberation
Postulates of five factor theory
Basic tendencies
All adults can be characterized by 5 basic traits
Traits are endogenous (like Allport)
Traits develop during childhood and mature afterward
Characteristic adaptations
Interaction with environment affects expression of traits
Room for maladjustment- Plasticity
Objective biography
Multiple determinism- hard to trace behavior
Life course- we make plans consistent with our traits
Extreme personality
Trait | Too low | Too high |
Agreeableness | Heartless, violent | Dependent, transparent |
Conscientiousness | Careless, heedless | Overcautious, stringent |
Extraversion | Aloof, reclusive | Bluster, showy |
Openness | Dogmatic, unimaginative | Overindulgent, unconformable |
Emotional stability | Defensive, hypersensitive | Emotionless |
Evolution and traits
Two main components
Natural selection- survival benefits, fitness
Sexual selection- mating benefits
Inclusive fitness theory- selection for traits that increase survival of genetic relatives
Great for explaining Traits that apply to the whole group, Gender differences, Cross cultural differences (very controversial)
Less useful for explaining Individual differences between people
Ethnic and National differences
Has been studied particularly in terms of intelligence
Often poorly studied (inappropriate sampling, test bias)
Often misinterpreted and overstated (the bell curve)
Often misapplied (1920s immigration reforms, etc.)
Always controversial
Still a taboo topic
Can selective pressure lead to personality and differences in types of intelligence
Cultural transmission and other “nurture” make it difficult to demonstrate
Heritability and traits
heritability and environment are about the same
genetic factors account for roughly 40-50% of differences
Neurotransmitter based theories
Neurotransmitters communicate between neurons
They can be very specific in their actions and have different effects on different parts of the CNS
Strongly implicated in certain disorders
Serotonin: depression
Dopamine: schizophrenia
DRD4 genetic theory
Molecular genetic
Associated with risk taking and novelty seeking (fast drivers, risky sex, promiscuity, infidelity, drug use, risking money)
Explanation:
Gene codes for dopamine receptors
Variant of gene leads to less dopamine receptive person
People with variant will seek excitement elsewhere
The association is small, inconsistent, and difficult to measure
Neuropeptide oxytocin
The love hormone or liquid trust
Strengthens maternal/ protective bonds in female rats
Human results very mixed, but implicated in pair bonding
Release in humans is triggered by: Sexual stimulation, Breast feeding, Empathy
Results in cuddling
Laboratory manipulated increases (typically nasal spray) can result in increased trust and generosity
Hormonal variation
Online diary with repeated saliva hormone assays
Premenstrual increases in neuroticism and decreases in extraversion.
Fertile states associated with higher extraversion and lower neuroticism
Suggests “fertility-induced shift in motivational priorities.”
Eysenck’s PEN
Psychoticism: Possibly male sex hormones, Associated with under arousal
Introversion/ extroversion: Weak/ strong nervous system, Introverts require less stimulation to achieve optimal arousal, Extraverts tolerate/ seek greater stimulation
Neuroticism: Limbic system, Higher level of emotional arousal
Kagan: a developmental approach
Infant temperament
Highly heritable
The biological foundation for personality
Stable over time (shyness research)
Two temperament groups
Inhibited-more fearful
Uninhibited-less fearful
Differences attributed to amygdala
Cloninger
divides your personality into two main parts: Temperament (your hardwired, automatic emotional reactions) and Character (your mature, learned goals and values)
Watson
Environment over everything
No racial differences in intelligence
Watson & Rayner and little albert
Rejects studying consciousness
3 unlearned responses (URs): Fear (US: loud sounds, falling), Rage (US: restraint), Love (US: stroking skin, sex organs)
No inheritance of: Capacity, Talent, Mental constitution, Characteristics
Behaviorism as a personality theory
a school of psychology and theory of learning stating that all behaviors are acquired through interaction with the environment via conditioning
Skinnerian concepts and assumptions
Empiricism- mentalism must be abandoned
Unit of analysis must be observable behavior
Principles of behavior are universal to all species
All behavior is a consequence of previous experience (never of planning or thinking or any internal mental process)
Individual differences reflect different reinforcement histories
The power of the environment (conflicting contingencies)
A behavior can be reinforced in one situation and punished in another
“The body that behaves heterosexually most of the time is the same body that is occasionally homosexual”
Operant conditioning and evolution