1/15
Looks like no tags are added yet.
The self-fulfilling Prophecy

difference between social and natural science
• Social sciences need to account for subjective
factors: Meaning structures and interpretative
processes affect human behavior; social sciences
deal with interpretations about interpretations
• Limited use of experimental methods in social
science
Experimental research
• Ideal of ceteris paribus = all other things being equal or held constant
• Preferably, in an experiment the researcher exerts complete control over potential causal factors in order to
arrive at conclusive evidence
• Example:
Do soccer referees prefer white players?
• Research design:
Confront referees with controversial match situations differing only with regard to players’ skin color .
• Ideally, experimental research provides clear-
cut evidence on the impact a potential causal
factor, keeping everything else constant.
Why limited use of experimental methods in social science
• Methodological reasons:
• Some phenomena are extremely rare/unique.
• You cannot separate certain phenomena from their natural context.
• You cannot simulate/replicate certain phenomena in the lab.
• Research subjects might respond to your observation, you might distort the observed phenomenon
(self-fulfilling, self-defeating prophecies).
• Ethical reasons: You cannot interfere (too much) in people’s lives.
Social science types of data
• Qualitative data: Documents, observations, small N case studies
• Survey data: Large N standardized questionnaire data as most important data source
• Secondary analysis of real life data (official statistics, digital trace data)
Social science types of methods
• Interpretative (hermeneutic) methods
• Multivariate statistics
Epistemological implications
• To some extent observations have to be substituted by theoretical speculations.
• As such speculations are interest driven, social sciences are more prone to ideological interpretations and
conflicts.
• Generalizations are difficult due to small number of cases.
• Propositions are rather probabilistic than deterministic.
• In short: Be a critical consumer of generalized propositions of social science!
Institutions
Central puzzle of social science: why is and what is social order and how is it maintained?
Institutions are the more enduring features of social life giving solidity to social systems
Institutions (Scott’s
• Institutions are comprised of regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive elements, that together with associated activities and resources, provide stability and meaning to social life
Three pillars of institutions
Regulative pillar
Formalized ‘rules of the game’, public and private regulations
• Mechanism to enforce compliance is coercion
Normative pillar
• Values and social norms define legitimate means to pursue valued ends
• Mechanism to enforce compliance is conformity
Cultural-cognitive pillar
• Meaning systems, cognitive frames, stereotypes
• Mechanism to enforce compliance is unconscious taken for grantedness
Relevance of organisations/institutions
• Organizations can embody certain institutions, that is,
• They reflect deeper values of what society regards as desirable.
• Organizations might work inefficient but these practices might be deep-seated in common beliefs.
• Organizations are embedded in a complex network of public and private regulations.
Basic concept sport
• Not identical with common language use:
Sport ≠ physical activity
• Originally, ‘sport’ refers to a very specific concept of physical activity defined by its regulated, competitive
character and record seeking
• Distinct from other forms of physical activity, e.g. German gymnastics (‘Turnen’) or Swedish gymnastics
• Implication: Scientific research has to be precise about the kind of physical activity examined
Basic concepts participation
Participation can assume different forms and refer to
• Membership in sport clubs
• Membership in commercial fitness studios
• Self-organized physical activity
• Important: Different people participate in different forms of physical activity for different reasons
• Implication: Scientific research has to be precise about the kind of participation examined